通过利用政策组合获得影响:来自更发达地区欧洲凝聚力政策的证据

IF 3.2 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Regional Science Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1111/jors.12666
Enrico Cristofoletti, Roberto Gabriele, Mara Giua
{"title":"通过利用政策组合获得影响:来自更发达地区欧洲凝聚力政策的证据","authors":"Enrico Cristofoletti,&nbsp;Roberto Gabriele,&nbsp;Mara Giua","doi":"10.1111/jors.12666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates how the overall impact of the European Cohesion Policy depends on the composition of the regional investment in <i>Hard</i> (infrastructure) and <i>Soft</i> (business and technical support) projects. The study employs a generalized propensity score (GPS) analysis in a multidimensional treatment context. In particular, the two dimensions considered are given by the <i>Hard</i> and <i>Soft</i> investments. The GPS estimation is based on a set of relevant idiosyncratic features of the regions. The second step estimates a dose–response function in a two-dimensional setting. The results confirm the existence of nonlinearities in the effect of different amounts of funds, but more importantly, show a degree of complementarity between <i>Hard</i> and <i>Soft</i> investment and that for policymakers, it is crucial to exploit such features to achieve more significant impact. The EU's more developed regions could have achieved a doubled GDP p.c. growth rate by pursuing a policy mix where <i>Hard</i> investments are reduced in favor of <i>Soft</i> investments. This improvement is comparable to the one obtained by at least doubling the available resources. The findings add to the evidence collected on the impact of the Cohesion Policy, suggesting a shift of the debate from the quantity to the quality of the expenditure pursued under the umbrella of territorial policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regional Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jors.12666","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaining in impacts by leveraging the policy mix: Evidence from the European Cohesion Policy in more developed regions\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Cristofoletti,&nbsp;Roberto Gabriele,&nbsp;Mara Giua\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jors.12666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper investigates how the overall impact of the European Cohesion Policy depends on the composition of the regional investment in <i>Hard</i> (infrastructure) and <i>Soft</i> (business and technical support) projects. The study employs a generalized propensity score (GPS) analysis in a multidimensional treatment context. In particular, the two dimensions considered are given by the <i>Hard</i> and <i>Soft</i> investments. The GPS estimation is based on a set of relevant idiosyncratic features of the regions. The second step estimates a dose–response function in a two-dimensional setting. The results confirm the existence of nonlinearities in the effect of different amounts of funds, but more importantly, show a degree of complementarity between <i>Hard</i> and <i>Soft</i> investment and that for policymakers, it is crucial to exploit such features to achieve more significant impact. The EU's more developed regions could have achieved a doubled GDP p.c. growth rate by pursuing a policy mix where <i>Hard</i> investments are reduced in favor of <i>Soft</i> investments. This improvement is comparable to the one obtained by at least doubling the available resources. The findings add to the evidence collected on the impact of the Cohesion Policy, suggesting a shift of the debate from the quantity to the quality of the expenditure pursued under the umbrella of territorial policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Regional Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jors.12666\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Regional Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jors.12666\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jors.12666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了欧洲凝聚力政策的总体影响如何取决于硬(基础设施)和软(商业和技术支持)项目的区域投资构成。该研究在多维治疗背景下采用了广义倾向评分(GPS)分析。特别是,所考虑的两个维度由硬投资和软投资给出。GPS估计是基于区域的一组相关的特殊特征。第二步在二维环境中估计剂量-反应函数。研究结果证实了不同资金数额的影响存在非线性,但更重要的是,表明硬投资和软投资之间存在一定程度的互补性,对于决策者来说,利用这些特征来实现更显著的影响至关重要。欧盟较发达的地区本可以通过采取减少硬投资而支持软投资的政策组合,实现GDP人均增长率的翻倍。这种改进与通过将可用资源至少增加一倍而获得的改进相当。这些调查结果补充了关于凝聚力政策影响的证据,表明在领土政策的保护伞下,辩论从支出的数量转向了质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gaining in impacts by leveraging the policy mix: Evidence from the European Cohesion Policy in more developed regions

This paper investigates how the overall impact of the European Cohesion Policy depends on the composition of the regional investment in Hard (infrastructure) and Soft (business and technical support) projects. The study employs a generalized propensity score (GPS) analysis in a multidimensional treatment context. In particular, the two dimensions considered are given by the Hard and Soft investments. The GPS estimation is based on a set of relevant idiosyncratic features of the regions. The second step estimates a dose–response function in a two-dimensional setting. The results confirm the existence of nonlinearities in the effect of different amounts of funds, but more importantly, show a degree of complementarity between Hard and Soft investment and that for policymakers, it is crucial to exploit such features to achieve more significant impact. The EU's more developed regions could have achieved a doubled GDP p.c. growth rate by pursuing a policy mix where Hard investments are reduced in favor of Soft investments. This improvement is comparable to the one obtained by at least doubling the available resources. The findings add to the evidence collected on the impact of the Cohesion Policy, suggesting a shift of the debate from the quantity to the quality of the expenditure pursued under the umbrella of territorial policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Regional Science (JRS) publishes original analytical research at the intersection of economics and quantitative geography. Since 1958, the JRS has published leading contributions to urban and regional thought including rigorous methodological contributions and seminal theoretical pieces. The JRS is one of the most highly cited journals in urban and regional research, planning, geography, and the environment. The JRS publishes work that advances our understanding of the geographic dimensions of urban and regional economies, human settlements, and policies related to cities and regions.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The empirical evidence of digital trends in more disadvantaged European Union regions in terms of income and population density The geography of intergenerational mobility in Norway: Labor market diversity, career opportunities, and gender Climate change and real estate: An introduction to the special issue Out‐of‐area home purchase and U.S. internal migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1