斯洛伐克共和国适用条件下抵押权行使的法定限制及其与捷克共和国法律规定的比较

Q2 Social Sciences Danube Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.2478/danb-2021-0015
Nikola Pacalajová, Martin Kubinec
{"title":"斯洛伐克共和国适用条件下抵押权行使的法定限制及其与捷克共和国法律规定的比较","authors":"Nikola Pacalajová, Martin Kubinec","doi":"10.2478/danb-2021-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Based on the analysis and comparison of legal regulation and existing case law, the authors present in the paper their opinion on the issue of deleting mortgage with statute-barred claim from public records (Land Registry). The Slovak legal regulation, in contrast with the Czech one, does not include an explicit provision enabling the deletion of mortgage with statute-barred claim from Land Registry. Taking into consideration the aspect of justice, the authors reached the conclusion that even without a normative platform, it is necessary to allow the mortgagor to apply to court to determine that the real estate is not mortgaged and subsequently use the court’s decision as a basis for deletion. However, since the courts decide in this case, using judicial activism, knowingly contrary to the purpose and content of the institute of statutory bar, the authors consider it essential that legislation be adopted as soon as possible to regulate this situation.","PeriodicalId":38400,"journal":{"name":"Danube","volume":"12 1","pages":"224 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statutory Bar on the Right to Exercise a Mortgage Under the Conditions Applicable in the Slovak Republic and Comparison with the Legal Regulation of the Czech Republic\",\"authors\":\"Nikola Pacalajová, Martin Kubinec\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/danb-2021-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Based on the analysis and comparison of legal regulation and existing case law, the authors present in the paper their opinion on the issue of deleting mortgage with statute-barred claim from public records (Land Registry). The Slovak legal regulation, in contrast with the Czech one, does not include an explicit provision enabling the deletion of mortgage with statute-barred claim from Land Registry. Taking into consideration the aspect of justice, the authors reached the conclusion that even without a normative platform, it is necessary to allow the mortgagor to apply to court to determine that the real estate is not mortgaged and subsequently use the court’s decision as a basis for deletion. However, since the courts decide in this case, using judicial activism, knowingly contrary to the purpose and content of the institute of statutory bar, the authors consider it essential that legislation be adopted as soon as possible to regulate this situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danube\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"224 - 238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danube\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2021-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danube","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2021-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要通过对法律法规和现有判例法的分析和比较,作者对从公共记录中删除具有法定权利要求的抵押(土地登记处)问题提出了自己的意见。与捷克的法律法规相比,斯洛伐克的法律法规没有包含明确的条款,允许删除法律禁止向土地登记处索赔的抵押贷款。考虑到公正性,作者得出的结论是,即使没有一个规范的平台,也有必要允许抵押人向法院申请确定不动产不抵押,并随后将法院的裁决作为删除的依据。然而,由于法院在本案中利用司法能动性作出裁决,故意违背了法定律师协会的宗旨和内容,提交人认为必须尽快通过立法来规范这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statutory Bar on the Right to Exercise a Mortgage Under the Conditions Applicable in the Slovak Republic and Comparison with the Legal Regulation of the Czech Republic
Abstract Based on the analysis and comparison of legal regulation and existing case law, the authors present in the paper their opinion on the issue of deleting mortgage with statute-barred claim from public records (Land Registry). The Slovak legal regulation, in contrast with the Czech one, does not include an explicit provision enabling the deletion of mortgage with statute-barred claim from Land Registry. Taking into consideration the aspect of justice, the authors reached the conclusion that even without a normative platform, it is necessary to allow the mortgagor to apply to court to determine that the real estate is not mortgaged and subsequently use the court’s decision as a basis for deletion. However, since the courts decide in this case, using judicial activism, knowingly contrary to the purpose and content of the institute of statutory bar, the authors consider it essential that legislation be adopted as soon as possible to regulate this situation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danube
Danube Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Legal Gap in Refugee Protection in Non-Signatory Countries: An Evidence from Indonesia Legal Aspects of Virtual Assets Regulation in Ukraine System Management and Improvement of Payment Planning Processes in Production Engineering Does the Education of Mothers Affect Their Experience pf Motherhood and Parenthood? Selected Aspects in the Czech Republic Public Administration Effectiveness of the Agro-Trade between Ukraine and the Slovak Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1