职业篮球比赛队员异质性与砍鲨策略

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport Finance Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.32731/ijsf/181.022023.01
Wen‐Jhan Jane, S. Chen, Ying-Jie Su
{"title":"职业篮球比赛队员异质性与砍鲨策略","authors":"Wen‐Jhan Jane, S. Chen, Ying-Jie Su","doi":"10.32731/ijsf/181.022023.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the issue of contestant heterogeneity (CH) in team efforts in National Basketball Association games for the three seasons from 2013/14 to 2015/16. The results show that two teams’ total efforts regarding rebounds and fouls increase as CH becomes smaller. The evidence thus indicates that the two teams play harder the smaller that CH is. In the analysis of the effects of heterogeneity on the favorite’s and the underdog’s efforts, the results show that each tries harder when CH is reduced and makes less effort as it becomes larger. These results support the contamination hypothesis. The checks for robustness in the panel regressions and results of Hack-a-Shaq strategy reinforce these conclusions. The evidence also shows that the appearance of the previous year’s champion in a game decreases the two teams’ total number of rebounds and fouls. Overwhelming CH makes both favorites and underdogs exert less effort.","PeriodicalId":45894,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contestant Heterogeneity and Hack-a-Shaq Strategy in Team Efforts in Professional Basketball Games\",\"authors\":\"Wen‐Jhan Jane, S. Chen, Ying-Jie Su\",\"doi\":\"10.32731/ijsf/181.022023.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article addresses the issue of contestant heterogeneity (CH) in team efforts in National Basketball Association games for the three seasons from 2013/14 to 2015/16. The results show that two teams’ total efforts regarding rebounds and fouls increase as CH becomes smaller. The evidence thus indicates that the two teams play harder the smaller that CH is. In the analysis of the effects of heterogeneity on the favorite’s and the underdog’s efforts, the results show that each tries harder when CH is reduced and makes less effort as it becomes larger. These results support the contamination hypothesis. The checks for robustness in the panel regressions and results of Hack-a-Shaq strategy reinforce these conclusions. The evidence also shows that the appearance of the previous year’s champion in a game decreases the two teams’ total number of rebounds and fouls. Overwhelming CH makes both favorites and underdogs exert less effort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sport Finance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sport Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32731/ijsf/181.022023.01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32731/ijsf/181.022023.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了2013/14赛季至2015/16赛季nba比赛中球员异质性(CH)的问题。结果表明,两队在篮板和犯规方面的总努力随着CH的减小而增加。因此,证据表明,CH越小,两队打得越努力。在分析异质性对赢家和输家努力的影响时,结果表明,当CH减少时,每个人都更加努力,而当CH变大时,每个人的努力就会减少。这些结果支持了污染假说。面板回归和哈克-沙克策略结果的稳健性检查强化了这些结论。证据还表明,前一年的冠军出现在一场比赛中会减少两队的篮板和犯规总数。压倒性的CH使热门和落后者都付出更少的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contestant Heterogeneity and Hack-a-Shaq Strategy in Team Efforts in Professional Basketball Games
This article addresses the issue of contestant heterogeneity (CH) in team efforts in National Basketball Association games for the three seasons from 2013/14 to 2015/16. The results show that two teams’ total efforts regarding rebounds and fouls increase as CH becomes smaller. The evidence thus indicates that the two teams play harder the smaller that CH is. In the analysis of the effects of heterogeneity on the favorite’s and the underdog’s efforts, the results show that each tries harder when CH is reduced and makes less effort as it becomes larger. These results support the contamination hypothesis. The checks for robustness in the panel regressions and results of Hack-a-Shaq strategy reinforce these conclusions. The evidence also shows that the appearance of the previous year’s champion in a game decreases the two teams’ total number of rebounds and fouls. Overwhelming CH makes both favorites and underdogs exert less effort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Finance
International Journal of Sport Finance HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Re-Evaluating the Role of Attendance on Home Advantage: Evidence From an International Rugby Tournament Participants’ Willingness to Pay for Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions at Large-Scale Sports-Tourism Events Pay and Performance in Men’s and Women’s Football: Comparing the MLS and NWSL College Football Television and Attendance: The Problem With Selection Bias The Stock Market Reaction to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics: Evidence from Japanese Sponsors and Taiwanese Olympic-Related Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1