俄罗斯社会结构的悖论

L. Gudkov
{"title":"俄罗斯社会结构的悖论","authors":"L. Gudkov","doi":"10.1080/10610154.2018.1627142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social stratification of post-Soviet Russia remains one of the most controversial subject areas in Russian sociology, despite the appearance over the past decade of significant studies on these topics. As a rule, Russian sociologists tended to focus their attention on two tasks dictated by the interest of state clients in sociology: determining the parameters of the poverty of the population (and the possibilities for reducing it, or in other words, the problem of “social inequality”) and the prospects for the formation and development of a middle class. In both cases the intentions of the research work and, accordingly, the internal orientations of the interpretation of the material turned out, albeit indirectly, to be predefined ideas for ensuring the efficacy of the state’s social policy and the stability of the system of government. For models of social structure that sociologists designed on the basis of state statistics or their own empirical research (mass population surveys), they usually employed international, that is, those recognized by the sociological community, principles of classification and methods of social taxonomy of the population, which include such operational parameters as income, education, type of occupation and professional activity of the respondent, standards of consumption, affiliation of oneself or one’s family with a certain class or social stratum, as well as (but less","PeriodicalId":85546,"journal":{"name":"Sociological research","volume":"57 1","pages":"196 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10610154.2018.1627142","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradoxes of the Social Structure in Russia\",\"authors\":\"L. Gudkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10610154.2018.1627142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The social stratification of post-Soviet Russia remains one of the most controversial subject areas in Russian sociology, despite the appearance over the past decade of significant studies on these topics. As a rule, Russian sociologists tended to focus their attention on two tasks dictated by the interest of state clients in sociology: determining the parameters of the poverty of the population (and the possibilities for reducing it, or in other words, the problem of “social inequality”) and the prospects for the formation and development of a middle class. In both cases the intentions of the research work and, accordingly, the internal orientations of the interpretation of the material turned out, albeit indirectly, to be predefined ideas for ensuring the efficacy of the state’s social policy and the stability of the system of government. For models of social structure that sociologists designed on the basis of state statistics or their own empirical research (mass population surveys), they usually employed international, that is, those recognized by the sociological community, principles of classification and methods of social taxonomy of the population, which include such operational parameters as income, education, type of occupation and professional activity of the respondent, standards of consumption, affiliation of oneself or one’s family with a certain class or social stratum, as well as (but less\",\"PeriodicalId\":85546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological research\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"196 - 246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10610154.2018.1627142\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2018.1627142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2018.1627142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

后苏联时代俄罗斯的社会分层仍然是俄罗斯社会学中最具争议的主题之一,尽管在过去十年中出现了对这些主题的重要研究。通常,俄罗斯社会学家倾向于将注意力集中在国家客户对社会学的兴趣所决定的两项任务上:确定人口贫困的参数(以及减少贫困的可能性,或者换言之,“社会不平等”问题)和中产阶级形成和发展的前景。在这两种情况下,研究工作的意图,以及相应的材料解释的内部方向,尽管是间接的,都被证明是确保国家社会政策有效性和政府体系稳定的预定义想法。对于社会学家在国家统计或他们自己的实证研究(大规模人口调查)的基础上设计的社会结构模型,他们通常采用国际的,即社会学界认可的模型、人口的分类原则和社会分类方法,其中包括收入、教育、,受访者的职业和职业活动类型、消费标准、自己或家人与某个阶级或社会阶层的关系,以及(但较少
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paradoxes of the Social Structure in Russia
The social stratification of post-Soviet Russia remains one of the most controversial subject areas in Russian sociology, despite the appearance over the past decade of significant studies on these topics. As a rule, Russian sociologists tended to focus their attention on two tasks dictated by the interest of state clients in sociology: determining the parameters of the poverty of the population (and the possibilities for reducing it, or in other words, the problem of “social inequality”) and the prospects for the formation and development of a middle class. In both cases the intentions of the research work and, accordingly, the internal orientations of the interpretation of the material turned out, albeit indirectly, to be predefined ideas for ensuring the efficacy of the state’s social policy and the stability of the system of government. For models of social structure that sociologists designed on the basis of state statistics or their own empirical research (mass population surveys), they usually employed international, that is, those recognized by the sociological community, principles of classification and methods of social taxonomy of the population, which include such operational parameters as income, education, type of occupation and professional activity of the respondent, standards of consumption, affiliation of oneself or one’s family with a certain class or social stratum, as well as (but less
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation Z: Youth Under the Rule of Putin A Study of Russia’s Demographic Problems in the Twenty-First Century The Role of the Geographical Factor in the Formation and Development of Human Potential The Social Functions of a Rural Teacher (on the Example of Altai Krai and the Altai Republic) Russian Parental Values in the Cross-Country Context from 1990–1991 to 2017–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1