衡量银行的可持续发展绩效:BESGI评分

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107216
Federica Ielasi , Marco Bellucci , Mario Biggeri , Lucia Ferrone
{"title":"衡量银行的可持续发展绩效:BESGI评分","authors":"Federica Ielasi ,&nbsp;Marco Bellucci ,&nbsp;Mario Biggeri ,&nbsp;Lucia Ferrone","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Internal and external pressures push the financial system towards an increasingly socially and environmentally responsible orientation. How to measure the overall ESG performance of a bank, considering both direct and indirect impacts? This study proposes a new indicator, the BESGI score (Banks' Environmental, Social, Governance and Indirect Impacts). Compared to other more traditional ESG scores, the model a) is bank-specific, b) is based on public data and then highly replicable, c) it can assess the level of a bank's sustainability both in its internal processes and procedures and in its choices about financing and investing activities, and d) is based on an innovative aggregation methodology, the Multidimensional Synthesis of Indicators, to consider the synergies among dimensions and penalize heterogeneity in the multidimensional bank results. We offer both a theoretical and an empirical contribution. First, the novel scoring model is presented, with indicators validated by practitioners and a theoretical framework rooted in organisational facades and legitimacy, signalling, and institutional theories. Secondly, we apply the BESGI scoring model to significant European banks and analyse its main determinants. Our results show relevant opportunities for banks to improve towards an overall and multi-comprehensive sustainability, especially concerning social measures and a higher focus on indirect impacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 107216"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523001828/pdfft?md5=1dcee79e449162ad3b90a35feffe7e60&pid=1-s2.0-S0195925523001828-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring banks' sustainability performances: The BESGI score\",\"authors\":\"Federica Ielasi ,&nbsp;Marco Bellucci ,&nbsp;Mario Biggeri ,&nbsp;Lucia Ferrone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Internal and external pressures push the financial system towards an increasingly socially and environmentally responsible orientation. How to measure the overall ESG performance of a bank, considering both direct and indirect impacts? This study proposes a new indicator, the BESGI score (Banks' Environmental, Social, Governance and Indirect Impacts). Compared to other more traditional ESG scores, the model a) is bank-specific, b) is based on public data and then highly replicable, c) it can assess the level of a bank's sustainability both in its internal processes and procedures and in its choices about financing and investing activities, and d) is based on an innovative aggregation methodology, the Multidimensional Synthesis of Indicators, to consider the synergies among dimensions and penalize heterogeneity in the multidimensional bank results. We offer both a theoretical and an empirical contribution. First, the novel scoring model is presented, with indicators validated by practitioners and a theoretical framework rooted in organisational facades and legitimacy, signalling, and institutional theories. Secondly, we apply the BESGI scoring model to significant European banks and analyse its main determinants. Our results show relevant opportunities for banks to improve towards an overall and multi-comprehensive sustainability, especially concerning social measures and a higher focus on indirect impacts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523001828/pdfft?md5=1dcee79e449162ad3b90a35feffe7e60&pid=1-s2.0-S0195925523001828-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523001828\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523001828","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内部和外部的压力促使金融系统朝着对社会和环境日益负责的方向发展。在考虑直接和间接影响的情况下,如何衡量银行的整体ESG绩效?本研究提出了一个新的指标,即BESGI分数(银行的环境、社会、治理和间接影响)。与其他更传统的ESG评分相比,该模型a)是针对银行的,b)基于公共数据,然后高度可复制,c)它可以评估银行在其内部流程和程序以及其融资和投资活动选择方面的可持续性水平,d)基于创新的汇总方法,即多维指标综合。考虑维度之间的协同作用,并在多维银行结果中惩罚异质性。我们提供了理论和实证的贡献。首先,提出了新的评分模型,其中包括由实践者验证的指标,以及植根于组织外观和合法性、信号和制度理论的理论框架。其次,我们将BESGI评分模型应用于欧洲主要银行,并分析其主要决定因素。我们的研究结果表明,银行有机会提高整体和多综合的可持续性,特别是在社会措施和对间接影响的高度关注方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring banks' sustainability performances: The BESGI score

Internal and external pressures push the financial system towards an increasingly socially and environmentally responsible orientation. How to measure the overall ESG performance of a bank, considering both direct and indirect impacts? This study proposes a new indicator, the BESGI score (Banks' Environmental, Social, Governance and Indirect Impacts). Compared to other more traditional ESG scores, the model a) is bank-specific, b) is based on public data and then highly replicable, c) it can assess the level of a bank's sustainability both in its internal processes and procedures and in its choices about financing and investing activities, and d) is based on an innovative aggregation methodology, the Multidimensional Synthesis of Indicators, to consider the synergies among dimensions and penalize heterogeneity in the multidimensional bank results. We offer both a theoretical and an empirical contribution. First, the novel scoring model is presented, with indicators validated by practitioners and a theoretical framework rooted in organisational facades and legitimacy, signalling, and institutional theories. Secondly, we apply the BESGI scoring model to significant European banks and analyse its main determinants. Our results show relevant opportunities for banks to improve towards an overall and multi-comprehensive sustainability, especially concerning social measures and a higher focus on indirect impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1