关于语义方法、塔斯基真理和结构主义的几点思考

Rodolfo Cunha Carnier
{"title":"关于语义方法、塔斯基真理和结构主义的几点思考","authors":"Rodolfo Cunha Carnier","doi":"10.20873/rpv8n1-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present paper, we return to one of the main theses we already defended concerning the role of the tarskian truth notion within the semantic approach (CARNIER, 2022). As it was argued, this truth notion proves to be insufficient to be applied to scientific theories as they are conceived by this approach, i.e., as extralinguistic entities, because it is a property of sentences and because the tarskian truth of a sentence doesn't necessarily mean the world is as it describes, which results in the fact that other truth conceptions more appropriate need to be articulated within the several members of the semanticist family, in order to characterize the relationship between theory and phenomenon. Our argument in this regard was based in a case study applied to constructive empiricism and quasi-realism, but in this paper we extend our analysis to structuralism, assuming and endorsing the position according to which this proposal may be considered a member of the semantic approach. \n ","PeriodicalId":32970,"journal":{"name":"Perspectivas de las Ciencias Economicas y Juridicas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some reflections on the semantic approach, tarskian truth and structuralism\",\"authors\":\"Rodolfo Cunha Carnier\",\"doi\":\"10.20873/rpv8n1-69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present paper, we return to one of the main theses we already defended concerning the role of the tarskian truth notion within the semantic approach (CARNIER, 2022). As it was argued, this truth notion proves to be insufficient to be applied to scientific theories as they are conceived by this approach, i.e., as extralinguistic entities, because it is a property of sentences and because the tarskian truth of a sentence doesn't necessarily mean the world is as it describes, which results in the fact that other truth conceptions more appropriate need to be articulated within the several members of the semanticist family, in order to characterize the relationship between theory and phenomenon. Our argument in this regard was based in a case study applied to constructive empiricism and quasi-realism, but in this paper we extend our analysis to structuralism, assuming and endorsing the position according to which this proposal may be considered a member of the semantic approach. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":32970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectivas de las Ciencias Economicas y Juridicas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectivas de las Ciencias Economicas y Juridicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20873/rpv8n1-69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectivas de las Ciencias Economicas y Juridicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20873/rpv8n1-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们回到我们已经捍卫的关于语义方法中塔斯基真理概念的作用的主要论点之一(cariner, 2022)。正如人们所争论的那样,这个真理概念被证明不足以应用于科学理论,因为它们是通过这种方法来理解的,也就是说,作为语言外的实体,因为它是句子的属性,因为句子的塔斯基真理并不一定意味着世界是它所描述的那样,这就导致了其他更合适的真理概念需要在语义学家族的几个成员中加以阐述,为了描述理论与现象之间的关系。我们在这方面的论点是基于一个应用于建设性经验主义和准现实主义的案例研究,但在本文中,我们将分析扩展到结构主义,假设并赞同这种立场,根据这种立场,这一建议可能被认为是语义方法的一员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Some reflections on the semantic approach, tarskian truth and structuralism
In the present paper, we return to one of the main theses we already defended concerning the role of the tarskian truth notion within the semantic approach (CARNIER, 2022). As it was argued, this truth notion proves to be insufficient to be applied to scientific theories as they are conceived by this approach, i.e., as extralinguistic entities, because it is a property of sentences and because the tarskian truth of a sentence doesn't necessarily mean the world is as it describes, which results in the fact that other truth conceptions more appropriate need to be articulated within the several members of the semanticist family, in order to characterize the relationship between theory and phenomenon. Our argument in this regard was based in a case study applied to constructive empiricism and quasi-realism, but in this paper we extend our analysis to structuralism, assuming and endorsing the position according to which this proposal may be considered a member of the semantic approach.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
En defensa de un control republicano reflexivo de constitucionalidad. Un análisis comparativo de las propuestas de Tom Hickey y Richard Bellamy Una controversia sobre el concepto de restricción externa Consejo de la Magistratura, reforma judicial feminista y acceso a la justicia Emociones y sesgos implícitos en el derecho. ¿Fenómenos similares? Factores clave en la retención del talento IT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1