淋巴结清扫计数在肾细胞癌治疗中的预后作用:一项大型国际队列研究

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Precision Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1002/prm2.12064
Feng Qi, Xiyi Wei, Xin Xia, Zongshi Qin, Xiao Li
{"title":"淋巴结清扫计数在肾细胞癌治疗中的预后作用:一项大型国际队列研究","authors":"Feng Qi, Xiyi Wei, Xin Xia, Zongshi Qin, Xiao Li","doi":"10.1002/prm2.12064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The count of lymph node dissection (LND) has been confirmed as a prognostic indicator in various cancers while the correlation between LND counts and patient prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was not fully studied. This research evaluated the link between LND counts and the prognosis of RCC patients. This study obtained RCC patients from the SEER database between 2010 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the predictive and prognostic value of LND. Besides, Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis was used for survival analysis. Finally, 1264 patients were included in this study, which were divided into none LND groups (249), 1–3 LND groups (166), and 4 or more LND groups (549). Age, laterality, stage, M stage, and grade were statistically different among the three groups. In univariate Cox analysis, stage, M stage, T stage, and grade were significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, race, stage, T stage, and grade were used as independent prognostic factors. KM survival analysis revealed that grade, T stage, M stage, and stage were significantly correlated with OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that LND counts were not significantly associated with survival risk in subgroups with different clinical factors. The current North American population analysis revealed that age, race, stage, T stage, and grade may be used as independent prognostic factors for patients with RCC. Moreover, the increasing LND counts during surgery may not improve the tumor outcomes of RCC patients.","PeriodicalId":40071,"journal":{"name":"Precision Medical Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"23 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic role of lymph node dissection counts in the management of renal cell carcinoma: A large international cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Feng Qi, Xiyi Wei, Xin Xia, Zongshi Qin, Xiao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prm2.12064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The count of lymph node dissection (LND) has been confirmed as a prognostic indicator in various cancers while the correlation between LND counts and patient prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was not fully studied. This research evaluated the link between LND counts and the prognosis of RCC patients. This study obtained RCC patients from the SEER database between 2010 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the predictive and prognostic value of LND. Besides, Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis was used for survival analysis. Finally, 1264 patients were included in this study, which were divided into none LND groups (249), 1–3 LND groups (166), and 4 or more LND groups (549). Age, laterality, stage, M stage, and grade were statistically different among the three groups. In univariate Cox analysis, stage, M stage, T stage, and grade were significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, race, stage, T stage, and grade were used as independent prognostic factors. KM survival analysis revealed that grade, T stage, M stage, and stage were significantly correlated with OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that LND counts were not significantly associated with survival risk in subgroups with different clinical factors. The current North American population analysis revealed that age, race, stage, T stage, and grade may be used as independent prognostic factors for patients with RCC. Moreover, the increasing LND counts during surgery may not improve the tumor outcomes of RCC patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prm2.12064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prm2.12064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

淋巴结清扫(LND)计数已被证实是各种癌症的预后指标,而肾细胞癌(RCC)中淋巴结清扫计数与患者预后之间的相关性尚未得到充分研究。本研究评估了肾细胞癌患者LND计数与预后之间的联系。本研究从SEER数据库中获取了2010年至2014年间的RCC患者。单变量和多变量Cox回归分析用于评估LND的预测和预后价值。此外,采用Kaplan–Meier(KM)生存分析进行生存分析。最后,1264名患者被纳入本研究,分为无LND组(249)、1-3个LND小组(166)和4个或更多个LND团体(549)。年龄、偏侧性、分期、M分期和年级在三组之间存在统计学差异。在单变量Cox分析中,分期、M分期、T分期和分级与总生存率(OS)显著相关。在多变量Cox回归分析中,年龄、种族、分期、T分期和分级被用作独立的预后因素。KM生存分析显示,分级、T分期、M分期和分期与OS显著相关。亚组分析显示,在具有不同临床因素的亚组中,LND计数与生存风险没有显著相关性。目前的北美人群分析显示,年龄、种族、分期、T分期和分级可作为RCC患者的独立预后因素。此外,手术期间LND计数的增加可能不会改善RCC患者的肿瘤预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The prognostic role of lymph node dissection counts in the management of renal cell carcinoma: A large international cohort study
The count of lymph node dissection (LND) has been confirmed as a prognostic indicator in various cancers while the correlation between LND counts and patient prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was not fully studied. This research evaluated the link between LND counts and the prognosis of RCC patients. This study obtained RCC patients from the SEER database between 2010 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the predictive and prognostic value of LND. Besides, Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis was used for survival analysis. Finally, 1264 patients were included in this study, which were divided into none LND groups (249), 1–3 LND groups (166), and 4 or more LND groups (549). Age, laterality, stage, M stage, and grade were statistically different among the three groups. In univariate Cox analysis, stage, M stage, T stage, and grade were significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, race, stage, T stage, and grade were used as independent prognostic factors. KM survival analysis revealed that grade, T stage, M stage, and stage were significantly correlated with OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that LND counts were not significantly associated with survival risk in subgroups with different clinical factors. The current North American population analysis revealed that age, race, stage, T stage, and grade may be used as independent prognostic factors for patients with RCC. Moreover, the increasing LND counts during surgery may not improve the tumor outcomes of RCC patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Medical Sciences
Precision Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prostatectomy postoperative urinary incontinence: From origin to treatment A case report of adult type 2 familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis Which inflammatory marker might be the best indicator for sacroiliitis? miRNAs involvement in the etiology and targeted therapy of bladder cancer: Interaction between signaling pathway Xiaotan Sanjie Fang prevents colonic inflammation‐related tumorigenesis by inhibiting COX‐2/VEGF expression cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1