口服抗凝剂在农村非瓣膜性房颤患者中的应用

Camille Brod , Nicole Groth , Macaela Rudeck , Ramin Artang , Matthew Rioux , Catherine Benziger
{"title":"口服抗凝剂在农村非瓣膜性房颤患者中的应用","authors":"Camille Brod ,&nbsp;Nicole Groth ,&nbsp;Macaela Rudeck ,&nbsp;Ramin Artang ,&nbsp;Matthew Rioux ,&nbsp;Catherine Benziger","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines established direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as first line therapy over warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ambulatory clinic patients with non-valvular AF or atrial flutter seen between 10/1/2019-7/12/2020 included. High-risk AF defined as males CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score ≥2 and females ≥3. Patients were separated into: warfarin, DOAC, or no oral anticoagulation (OAC). ATRIA bleed score calculated. A provider survey assessing knowledge and barriers to anticoagulation completed via REDCap between 3/5-4/16/2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 12,014 subjects with AF, 8,032 were high risk (mean age 75.9 ± 9.8 years; 57.5% male). There were 4,619 (57.1%) ≥ 75 years and 63.4% were rural dwelling. There was no significant difference between the number of subjects on anticoagulation before and after the guideline publication (75.6% vs. 75.7%, <em>p</em> = 0.79). Warfarin use decreased 2.3% over 1 year (39.3% to 37.0%), while DOACs increased 2.4% (36.2% to 38.7%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for both). At 1-year, age, male gender, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score 4-6, hypertension, stroke and cardiology consult increased prescription of OAC (p&lt;0.05). Vascular disease, high risk ATRIA bleed, renal disease, prior hemorrhage, and left atrial appendage occlusion were associated with decreased OAC use (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Left atrial appendage occlusion device use was low (&lt;1%). In a survey, majority of providers noted bleeding risk (35.1%) and cost (25.0%) to be the biggest barriers to DOAC use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The new guidelines caused a slight increase in DOACs over time. Significant barriers to DOAC use exist in rural areas; one in four high risk AF patient remains without OAC therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral anticoagulation use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in rural setting\",\"authors\":\"Camille Brod ,&nbsp;Nicole Groth ,&nbsp;Macaela Rudeck ,&nbsp;Ramin Artang ,&nbsp;Matthew Rioux ,&nbsp;Catherine Benziger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines established direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as first line therapy over warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ambulatory clinic patients with non-valvular AF or atrial flutter seen between 10/1/2019-7/12/2020 included. High-risk AF defined as males CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score ≥2 and females ≥3. Patients were separated into: warfarin, DOAC, or no oral anticoagulation (OAC). ATRIA bleed score calculated. A provider survey assessing knowledge and barriers to anticoagulation completed via REDCap between 3/5-4/16/2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 12,014 subjects with AF, 8,032 were high risk (mean age 75.9 ± 9.8 years; 57.5% male). There were 4,619 (57.1%) ≥ 75 years and 63.4% were rural dwelling. There was no significant difference between the number of subjects on anticoagulation before and after the guideline publication (75.6% vs. 75.7%, <em>p</em> = 0.79). Warfarin use decreased 2.3% over 1 year (39.3% to 37.0%), while DOACs increased 2.4% (36.2% to 38.7%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for both). At 1-year, age, male gender, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score 4-6, hypertension, stroke and cardiology consult increased prescription of OAC (p&lt;0.05). Vascular disease, high risk ATRIA bleed, renal disease, prior hemorrhage, and left atrial appendage occlusion were associated with decreased OAC use (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Left atrial appendage occlusion device use was low (&lt;1%). In a survey, majority of providers noted bleeding risk (35.1%) and cost (25.0%) to be the biggest barriers to DOAC use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The new guidelines caused a slight increase in DOACs over time. Significant barriers to DOAC use exist in rural areas; one in four high risk AF patient remains without OAC therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of medicine open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of medicine open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036422000218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036422000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年ACC/AHA/HRS指南将直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)作为治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)的一线治疗方法,而不是华法林。方法纳入2019年10月1日至2020年7月12日期间门诊非瓣膜性房颤或心房扑动患者。高危房颤定义为男性CHA2DS2-VASc评分≥2,女性≥3。患者被分为:华法林,DOAC,或无口服抗凝(OAC)。计算心房出血评分。在2020年3月5日至4月16日期间通过REDCap完成了一项评估抗凝知识和障碍的提供者调查。结果12014例房颤患者中,8032例为高危人群(平均年龄75.9±9.8岁;57.5%的男性)。≥75岁的4619例(57.1%),63.4%为农村居民。指南发表前后接受抗凝治疗的受试者人数无显著差异(75.6% vs. 75.7%, p = 0.79)。华法林的使用在1年内下降了2.3%(39.3%至37.0%),而DOACs增加了2.4%(36.2%至38.7%),p <两者均为0.001)。1岁时,年龄、男性、CHA2DS2-VASc评分4-6、高血压、脑卒中、心内科会诊OAC处方增加(p < 0.05)。血管疾病、高危心房出血、肾脏疾病、既往出血和左心耳闭塞与OAC使用减少相关(p <0.05)。左心耳闭塞器使用率低(1%)。在一项调查中,大多数提供者指出出血风险(35.1%)和费用(25.0%)是使用DOAC的最大障碍。随着时间的推移,新指南导致DOACs略有增加。农村地区使用DOAC存在重大障碍;四分之一的高危房颤患者仍未接受OAC治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oral anticoagulation use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in rural setting

Background

The 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines established direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as first line therapy over warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

Ambulatory clinic patients with non-valvular AF or atrial flutter seen between 10/1/2019-7/12/2020 included. High-risk AF defined as males CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 and females ≥3. Patients were separated into: warfarin, DOAC, or no oral anticoagulation (OAC). ATRIA bleed score calculated. A provider survey assessing knowledge and barriers to anticoagulation completed via REDCap between 3/5-4/16/2020.

Results

Of 12,014 subjects with AF, 8,032 were high risk (mean age 75.9 ± 9.8 years; 57.5% male). There were 4,619 (57.1%) ≥ 75 years and 63.4% were rural dwelling. There was no significant difference between the number of subjects on anticoagulation before and after the guideline publication (75.6% vs. 75.7%, p = 0.79). Warfarin use decreased 2.3% over 1 year (39.3% to 37.0%), while DOACs increased 2.4% (36.2% to 38.7%, p < 0.001 for both). At 1-year, age, male gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score 4-6, hypertension, stroke and cardiology consult increased prescription of OAC (p<0.05). Vascular disease, high risk ATRIA bleed, renal disease, prior hemorrhage, and left atrial appendage occlusion were associated with decreased OAC use (p < 0.05). Left atrial appendage occlusion device use was low (<1%). In a survey, majority of providers noted bleeding risk (35.1%) and cost (25.0%) to be the biggest barriers to DOAC use.

Conclusions

The new guidelines caused a slight increase in DOACs over time. Significant barriers to DOAC use exist in rural areas; one in four high risk AF patient remains without OAC therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Functional Assessment of >18 Years Old Patients at Internal Medicine Ward—Relationship with In-Hospital and 30-Day Mortality Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey Post-Acute Sequelae of Covid-19: A System-wise Approach on the Effects of Long-Covid-19 In-Hospital Mortality by Race and Ethnicity Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Using Data From the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Among Emerging Adult Cannabis Users by Race/Ethnicity: Analysis of the 2009-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1