老龄化的偏好和预测因素:来自澳大利亚墨尔本的纵向证据

H. Kendig, C. Gong, Lisa Cannon, C. Browning
{"title":"老龄化的偏好和预测因素:来自澳大利亚墨尔本的纵向证据","authors":"H. Kendig, C. Gong, Lisa Cannon, C. Browning","doi":"10.1080/02763893.2017.1280582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article reports older Australians' preferences for aging in place and predictors of their subsequent experiences drawing on a longitudinal study in Melbourne over 16 years. At baseline, 40% had lived in their homes for 30 or more years and the majority had preference for aging in place. However, the proportion continuing to do so was lower, with reducing independence being a major barrier. Women, renters, those not living with a partner, or those with depressive symptoms were most vulnerable, while home ownership, socioeconomic resources, neighborhood satisfaction, and home modifications were positively associated with aging in place.","PeriodicalId":46221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing for the Elderly","volume":"31 1","pages":"259 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02763893.2017.1280582","citationCount":"60","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences and Predictors of Aging in Place: Longitudinal Evidence from Melbourne, Australia\",\"authors\":\"H. Kendig, C. Gong, Lisa Cannon, C. Browning\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02763893.2017.1280582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article reports older Australians' preferences for aging in place and predictors of their subsequent experiences drawing on a longitudinal study in Melbourne over 16 years. At baseline, 40% had lived in their homes for 30 or more years and the majority had preference for aging in place. However, the proportion continuing to do so was lower, with reducing independence being a major barrier. Women, renters, those not living with a partner, or those with depressive symptoms were most vulnerable, while home ownership, socioeconomic resources, neighborhood satisfaction, and home modifications were positively associated with aging in place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Housing for the Elderly\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"259 - 271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02763893.2017.1280582\",\"citationCount\":\"60\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Housing for the Elderly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1280582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing for the Elderly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1280582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

摘要

摘要本文根据墨尔本16年来的一项纵向研究,报道了澳大利亚老年人对就地老龄化的偏好,以及他们随后经历的预测因素。在基线调查中,40%的人已经在家里住了30年或更长时间,大多数人更喜欢就地养老。然而,继续这样做的比例较低,降低独立性是一个主要障碍。女性、租房者、没有伴侣生活的人或有抑郁症状的人最容易受到伤害,而房屋所有权、社会经济资源、社区满意度和房屋改造与当地的老龄化呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preferences and Predictors of Aging in Place: Longitudinal Evidence from Melbourne, Australia
ABSTRACT This article reports older Australians' preferences for aging in place and predictors of their subsequent experiences drawing on a longitudinal study in Melbourne over 16 years. At baseline, 40% had lived in their homes for 30 or more years and the majority had preference for aging in place. However, the proportion continuing to do so was lower, with reducing independence being a major barrier. Women, renters, those not living with a partner, or those with depressive symptoms were most vulnerable, while home ownership, socioeconomic resources, neighborhood satisfaction, and home modifications were positively associated with aging in place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Housing is more than houses-it is the foundation upon which the essentials of life are anchored. The quality of housing can enhance or diminish the well-being of individuals and families as well as that of the entire community. Before the Journal of Housing for the Elderly, housing for the elderly as a subject area has a relatively brief history. The Journal of Housing for the Elderly aims to serve the needs of gerontological professionals in the fields of architecture and housing, urban planning, and public policy who are responsible for the residential environments of the elderly in the community.
期刊最新文献
Enablers and Barriers in the Physical Environment of Care for Older People in Ordinary Housing: A Scoping Review The Presence of Memory-Enriched Environments for Cognitively Impaired Nursing Home Residents Culture Change in Skilled Nursing: An Exploratory Comparison of a Traditional Home to a New Model The Physical Housing Environment and Subjective Well-Being Among Older People Using Long-Term Care Services in Japan Planning for Aging in Place: Incorporating the Voice of Elders to Promote Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1