EGFR突变局部晚期肺腺癌的真实治疗模式和临床结果:一项多中心队列研究

Nan Bi , Kunpeng Xu , Hong Ge , Ming Chen , Mingyan E , Li Zhang , Jianzhong Cao , Xu Zhang , Xiao Ding , Bing Xia , Lujun Zhao , Lijie Han , Jiancheng Li , Chen Hu , Luhua Wang
{"title":"EGFR突变局部晚期肺腺癌的真实治疗模式和临床结果:一项多中心队列研究","authors":"Nan Bi ,&nbsp;Kunpeng Xu ,&nbsp;Hong Ge ,&nbsp;Ming Chen ,&nbsp;Mingyan E ,&nbsp;Li Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianzhong Cao ,&nbsp;Xu Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiao Ding ,&nbsp;Bing Xia ,&nbsp;Lujun Zhao ,&nbsp;Lijie Han ,&nbsp;Jiancheng Li ,&nbsp;Chen Hu ,&nbsp;Luhua Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2022.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the optimal management of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene (<em>EGFR</em>) mutant locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with unresectable stage III lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) harboring <em>EGFR</em> mutations from 2012 to 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and were categorized into three groups according to the primary treatment: chemoradiotherpy (CRT) (group 1), combined radiation therapy (RT) and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with/without chemotherapy (group 2), and EGFR-TKI alone until tumor progression (group 3). Inverse probability of multiple treatment weighting (IPTW) of propensity score was used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) between treatments and account for confounding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104, 105, and 231 patients were categorized into groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After IPTW adjustment, the median PFS for each group was 12.4, 26.2, and 16.2 months (log-rank <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001), and the median OS was 51.0, 67.4 and 49.3 months (log-rank <em>P</em> = 0.084), respectively. Compared with those in group 1, patients in group 2 had significantly improved PFS [adjusted hazard ratio HR (aHR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29, 0.54; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001] and OS (aHR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.98; <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.039). Patients in group 3 had prolonged PFS (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.87; <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.003), but not OS (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.32; <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.595). Doubly robust IPTW analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis yielded similar findings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EGFR-TKIs after chemoradiation or combined with radiation alone correlated with the longest PFS and OS (versus CRT or TKIs alone) in patients with <em>EGFR</em>-mutant unresectable LA-NSCLC. Well-designed prospective trials were warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in EGFR-mutant locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A multi-center cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Nan Bi ,&nbsp;Kunpeng Xu ,&nbsp;Hong Ge ,&nbsp;Ming Chen ,&nbsp;Mingyan E ,&nbsp;Li Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianzhong Cao ,&nbsp;Xu Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiao Ding ,&nbsp;Bing Xia ,&nbsp;Lujun Zhao ,&nbsp;Lijie Han ,&nbsp;Jiancheng Li ,&nbsp;Chen Hu ,&nbsp;Luhua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jncc.2022.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the optimal management of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene (<em>EGFR</em>) mutant locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with unresectable stage III lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) harboring <em>EGFR</em> mutations from 2012 to 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and were categorized into three groups according to the primary treatment: chemoradiotherpy (CRT) (group 1), combined radiation therapy (RT) and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with/without chemotherapy (group 2), and EGFR-TKI alone until tumor progression (group 3). Inverse probability of multiple treatment weighting (IPTW) of propensity score was used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) between treatments and account for confounding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104, 105, and 231 patients were categorized into groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After IPTW adjustment, the median PFS for each group was 12.4, 26.2, and 16.2 months (log-rank <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001), and the median OS was 51.0, 67.4 and 49.3 months (log-rank <em>P</em> = 0.084), respectively. Compared with those in group 1, patients in group 2 had significantly improved PFS [adjusted hazard ratio HR (aHR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29, 0.54; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001] and OS (aHR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.98; <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.039). Patients in group 3 had prolonged PFS (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.87; <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.003), but not OS (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.32; <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.595). Doubly robust IPTW analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis yielded similar findings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EGFR-TKIs after chemoradiation or combined with radiation alone correlated with the longest PFS and OS (versus CRT or TKIs alone) in patients with <em>EGFR</em>-mutant unresectable LA-NSCLC. Well-designed prospective trials were warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 65-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨表皮生长因子受体基因(EGFR)突变的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(LA-NSCLC)患者的最佳治疗方法。方法回顾性分析2012 - 2018年发生EGFR突变的不能切除的III期肺腺癌(LAC)患者,根据主要治疗方法分为3组:放化疗(CRT)(第1组),联合放疗(RT)和egfr -酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合化疗(第2组),以及单独使用EGFR-TKI直到肿瘤进展(第3组)。倾向评分多重治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)用于比较治疗之间的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),并考虑混杂因素。结果1组104例,2组105例,3组231例。经IPTW调整后,各组的中位PFS分别为12.4、26.2和16.2个月(log-rank P <0.001),中位OS分别为51.0、67.4和49.3个月(log-rank P = 0.084)。与1组比较,2组患者PFS明显改善[校正风险比HR (aHR), 0.40;95%置信区间(CI): 0.29, 0.54;P & lt;0.001]和OS (aHR, 0.61;95% ci: 0.38, 0.98;p = 0.039)。3组患者PFS延长(aHR, 0.66;95% ci: 0.50, 0.87;P = 0.003),但OS无统计学意义(aHR, 0.90;95% ci: 0.62, 1.32;p = 0.595)。双稳健IPTW分析和多变量Cox回归分析得出了类似的结果。结论在egfr突变不可切除的LA-NSCLC患者中,放化疗后的segfr -TKIs或单独放疗与最长的PFS和OS相关(与单独CRT或TKIs相比)。精心设计的前瞻性试验是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in EGFR-mutant locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A multi-center cohort study

Objective

To investigate the optimal management of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutant locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with unresectable stage III lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) harboring EGFR mutations from 2012 to 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and were categorized into three groups according to the primary treatment: chemoradiotherpy (CRT) (group 1), combined radiation therapy (RT) and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with/without chemotherapy (group 2), and EGFR-TKI alone until tumor progression (group 3). Inverse probability of multiple treatment weighting (IPTW) of propensity score was used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) between treatments and account for confounding.

Results

A total of 104, 105, and 231 patients were categorized into groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After IPTW adjustment, the median PFS for each group was 12.4, 26.2, and 16.2 months (log-rank P < 0.001), and the median OS was 51.0, 67.4 and 49.3 months (log-rank P = 0.084), respectively. Compared with those in group 1, patients in group 2 had significantly improved PFS [adjusted hazard ratio HR (aHR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29, 0.54; P < 0.001] and OS (aHR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.98; P = 0.039). Patients in group 3 had prolonged PFS (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.87; P = 0.003), but not OS (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.32; P = 0.595). Doubly robust IPTW analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis yielded similar findings.

Conclusions

EGFR-TKIs after chemoradiation or combined with radiation alone correlated with the longest PFS and OS (versus CRT or TKIs alone) in patients with EGFR-mutant unresectable LA-NSCLC. Well-designed prospective trials were warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment and triage strategy of cervical cancer primary screening on HPV integration status: 5-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study. Osteoimmunology in bone malignancies: a symphony with evil. Disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow as predictive classifiers for small cell lung cancer patients. Editorial Board TDERS, an exosome RNA-derived signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in clear cell renal cell cancer: a multicohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1