林业、生物能源和气候——澳大利亚的前进之路

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY Australian Forestry Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00049158.2021.1876405
F. Ximenes
{"title":"林业、生物能源和气候——澳大利亚的前进之路","authors":"F. Ximenes","doi":"10.1080/00049158.2021.1876405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable forest management ensures that biomass removals do not exceed forest growth, maintaining stable carbon stocks. When biomass created as a byproduct of tree-harvesting for sawlogs or pulp is used for bioenergy generation, the carbon emitted in this process is re-absorbed by growing trees as part of the natural carbon cycling in sustainably managed forests. Thus, the use of biomass for bioenergy generation can make an important contribution to climate change mitigation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. Bioenergy can broadly be classified into three key end-use categories: electricity, heat and transport fuels. In Australia, many small electricity-generation units are fuelled by biomass, and a number of larger grid-scale facilities are accredited to generate renewable energy credits under the Large Scale Renewable Energy Target (RET) scheme. The majority of these facilities use sugarcane bagasse as feedstock. A small amount of biomass is also cofired with coal (e.g. at the Vales Point power station in New South Wales – NSW). Some domestic facilities (e.g. Altus Renewables in Queensland) produce pellets from sawmill residues, with the pellets exported for use in power stations overseas. There is significant use of wood for domestic heating and also for industrial applications—in sawmills, for example, residues are used in boilers to generate heat for drying timber. It is likely that interest in the use of biomass for heat in industrial applications to displace fossil fuels would increase if current renewable energy incentives such as the RET also included allowances for heat generation; currently, however, the RET only covers electricity generation. There has been some interest in liquid transport fuel applications from woody material (e.g. jet fuel) but little tangible progress—although Boral in NSW recently investigated the potential for the production of renewable diesel from hardwood sawmill residues. Despite its potential, the development of a thriving bioenergy industry in Australia supported by biomass from sustainable forestry operations has not yet eventuated. There has been much promise, but numerous projects have ultimately failed. A number of recognised factors are linked to this chequered history, including issues with the regulatory environment, a lack of consistent policy signals, issues of social licence, misconceptions about the climate benefits of bioenergy, and poor access to information on available technology options. It is important to distinguish the various potential sources of forestry-derived biomass, which include residues from the harvesting of trees for higher-value products; biomass from dedicated energy crops; and residues from wood-processing facilities and end-of-life materials (e.g. construction and demolition – C&D – waste). The issue of sustainability is often raised when considering the use of forest harvest residues for bioenergy, including around the debate on climate benefits. Nevertheless, it is commonly accepted that forest bioenergy can deliver meaningful climate benefits if it displaces the use of fossil fuels and if the biomass is sourced from residues from sustainable forest operations or from energy crops established on marginal, unproductive land (e.g. Reid et al. 2019). Other concerns around the use of biomass for energy include the impact of residue removals on the future nutritional needs of the forest and the impacts on biodiversity caused by habitat removal. For native forests, a recent study in NSW demonstrated that it is possible to remove substantial quantities of harvest residues with minimal impact on future nutritional needs or habitat (Ximenes, Coburn et al. 2017). In plantations, the removal of residues for bioenergy may mean that fertiliser must be added in later rotations—this becomes a management decision. In Scandinavian countries, the high-nutrient ash obtained from the combustion of biomass is returned to the forest—in Sweden, around 50 000 tonnes of clean wood ash is spread each year in forests in the southern provinces (IRENA 2019). Large volumes of residues are generated during forest harvesting and also at wood-processing facilities. The ‘Australian Biomass for Bioenergy Assessment’ project has quantified and mapped organic residues from many sources, including sustainable forestry operations – at least 2 million tonnes of residues per year are generated during the harvesting and processing of wood in NSW alone. Although the bulk of forestry residues is derived from harvesting operations, localised opportunities exist associated with processing residues from sawmills and also from end-of-life timber products (e.g. C&D waste), which would otherwise be placed in landfills. This resource is currently underused and potentially available for bioenergy projects. Thus, there is a clear, underdeveloped opportunity that links sustainably derived forestry biomass, energy generation and climate change mitigation goals. Bioenergy can be considered the ‘forgotten renewable’ in Australia when its potential is compared to actual project development, especially in relation to other renewables such as solar and wind. Bioenergy has an advantage over intermittent renewables such as solar and wind in its ability to provide much-needed dispatchable energy, and it also has an important role to play in stabilising supply to the electricity grid, especially as the","PeriodicalId":55426,"journal":{"name":"Australian Forestry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049158.2021.1876405","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forestry, bioenergy and climate – a way forward in Australia\",\"authors\":\"F. Ximenes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049158.2021.1876405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainable forest management ensures that biomass removals do not exceed forest growth, maintaining stable carbon stocks. When biomass created as a byproduct of tree-harvesting for sawlogs or pulp is used for bioenergy generation, the carbon emitted in this process is re-absorbed by growing trees as part of the natural carbon cycling in sustainably managed forests. Thus, the use of biomass for bioenergy generation can make an important contribution to climate change mitigation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. Bioenergy can broadly be classified into three key end-use categories: electricity, heat and transport fuels. In Australia, many small electricity-generation units are fuelled by biomass, and a number of larger grid-scale facilities are accredited to generate renewable energy credits under the Large Scale Renewable Energy Target (RET) scheme. The majority of these facilities use sugarcane bagasse as feedstock. A small amount of biomass is also cofired with coal (e.g. at the Vales Point power station in New South Wales – NSW). Some domestic facilities (e.g. Altus Renewables in Queensland) produce pellets from sawmill residues, with the pellets exported for use in power stations overseas. There is significant use of wood for domestic heating and also for industrial applications—in sawmills, for example, residues are used in boilers to generate heat for drying timber. It is likely that interest in the use of biomass for heat in industrial applications to displace fossil fuels would increase if current renewable energy incentives such as the RET also included allowances for heat generation; currently, however, the RET only covers electricity generation. There has been some interest in liquid transport fuel applications from woody material (e.g. jet fuel) but little tangible progress—although Boral in NSW recently investigated the potential for the production of renewable diesel from hardwood sawmill residues. Despite its potential, the development of a thriving bioenergy industry in Australia supported by biomass from sustainable forestry operations has not yet eventuated. There has been much promise, but numerous projects have ultimately failed. A number of recognised factors are linked to this chequered history, including issues with the regulatory environment, a lack of consistent policy signals, issues of social licence, misconceptions about the climate benefits of bioenergy, and poor access to information on available technology options. It is important to distinguish the various potential sources of forestry-derived biomass, which include residues from the harvesting of trees for higher-value products; biomass from dedicated energy crops; and residues from wood-processing facilities and end-of-life materials (e.g. construction and demolition – C&D – waste). The issue of sustainability is often raised when considering the use of forest harvest residues for bioenergy, including around the debate on climate benefits. Nevertheless, it is commonly accepted that forest bioenergy can deliver meaningful climate benefits if it displaces the use of fossil fuels and if the biomass is sourced from residues from sustainable forest operations or from energy crops established on marginal, unproductive land (e.g. Reid et al. 2019). Other concerns around the use of biomass for energy include the impact of residue removals on the future nutritional needs of the forest and the impacts on biodiversity caused by habitat removal. For native forests, a recent study in NSW demonstrated that it is possible to remove substantial quantities of harvest residues with minimal impact on future nutritional needs or habitat (Ximenes, Coburn et al. 2017). In plantations, the removal of residues for bioenergy may mean that fertiliser must be added in later rotations—this becomes a management decision. In Scandinavian countries, the high-nutrient ash obtained from the combustion of biomass is returned to the forest—in Sweden, around 50 000 tonnes of clean wood ash is spread each year in forests in the southern provinces (IRENA 2019). Large volumes of residues are generated during forest harvesting and also at wood-processing facilities. The ‘Australian Biomass for Bioenergy Assessment’ project has quantified and mapped organic residues from many sources, including sustainable forestry operations – at least 2 million tonnes of residues per year are generated during the harvesting and processing of wood in NSW alone. Although the bulk of forestry residues is derived from harvesting operations, localised opportunities exist associated with processing residues from sawmills and also from end-of-life timber products (e.g. C&D waste), which would otherwise be placed in landfills. This resource is currently underused and potentially available for bioenergy projects. Thus, there is a clear, underdeveloped opportunity that links sustainably derived forestry biomass, energy generation and climate change mitigation goals. Bioenergy can be considered the ‘forgotten renewable’ in Australia when its potential is compared to actual project development, especially in relation to other renewables such as solar and wind. Bioenergy has an advantage over intermittent renewables such as solar and wind in its ability to provide much-needed dispatchable energy, and it also has an important role to play in stabilising supply to the electricity grid, especially as the\",\"PeriodicalId\":55426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Forestry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049158.2021.1876405\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2021.1876405\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2021.1876405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

可持续森林管理确保生物量清除量不超过森林增长,保持稳定的碳储量。当作为伐木或纸浆的副产品而产生的生物质用于生物能源生产时,作为可持续管理森林中自然碳循环的一部分,这一过程中排放的碳被树木重新吸收。因此,随着世界从化石燃料转型,利用生物质发电可以为缓解气候变化做出重要贡献。生物能源大致可分为三类关键的最终用途:电力、热能和运输燃料。在澳大利亚,许多小型发电机组都以生物质为燃料,许多大型电网规模的设施根据大规模可再生能源目标(RET)计划获得了可再生能源信贷的认证。这些设施中的大多数使用甘蔗渣作为原料。少量生物质也与煤炭共同燃烧(例如新南威尔士州Vales Point发电站)。一些国内设施(如昆士兰的Altus Renewables)用锯木厂残留物生产球团,球团出口用于海外发电站。木材在家庭供暖和工业应用中有着重要的用途——例如,在锯木厂,残留物被用于锅炉中,产生用于干燥木材的热量。如果可再生能源技术等现行可再生能源激励措施也包括供热补贴,那么在工业应用中使用生物质供热以取代化石燃料的兴趣可能会增加;然而,目前可再生能源技术仅涵盖发电。人们对木质材料(如喷气燃料)的液体运输燃料应用产生了一些兴趣,但进展甚微——尽管新南威尔士州的Boral最近调查了用硬木锯木厂残留物生产可再生柴油的潜力。尽管有潜力,但在可持续林业运营的生物质支持下,澳大利亚蓬勃发展的生物能源产业尚未实现。虽然有很多希望,但许多项目最终都失败了。许多公认的因素与这段曲折的历史有关,包括监管环境问题、缺乏一致的政策信号、社会许可证问题、对生物能源气候效益的误解,以及获取可用技术选择信息的机会不足。重要的是要区分林业衍生生物量的各种潜在来源,包括为获得更高价值的产品而砍伐树木的残留物;专用能源作物的生物量;以及木材加工设施和报废材料的残留物(如建筑和拆除——C&D——废物)。在考虑将森林采伐残留物用于生物能源时,包括在关于气候效益的辩论中,经常会提出可持续性问题。尽管如此,人们普遍认为,如果森林生物能源取代了化石燃料的使用,并且生物质来源于可持续森林经营的残留物或在边际非生产性土地上种植的能源作物,那么森林生物能源可以带来有意义的气候效益(例如Reid等人,2019)。关于利用生物量作为能源的其他关切包括残留物清除对森林未来营养需求的影响以及栖息地清除对生物多样性的影响。对于原生森林,新南威尔士州最近的一项研究表明,可以在对未来营养需求或栖息地影响最小的情况下清除大量的收获残留物(Ximenes,Coburn等人,2017)。在种植园中,去除生物能源的残留物可能意味着必须在以后的轮作中添加肥料——这将成为一个管理决策。在斯堪的纳维亚国家,生物质燃烧产生的高营养灰被送回森林——在瑞典,每年约有5万吨清洁木灰分布在南部省份的森林中(IRENA 2019)。森林采伐期间以及木材加工设施中都会产生大量残留物。“澳大利亚生物质用于生物能源评估”项目量化并绘制了许多来源的有机残留物,包括可持续林业经营——仅新南威尔士州的木材采伐和加工过程中每年就产生至少200万吨残留物。尽管大部分林业残留物来自采伐作业,但存在与加工锯木厂和报废木材产品(如C&D废物)残留物相关的局部机会,否则这些残留物将被放入垃圾填埋场。这一资源目前未得到充分利用,有可能用于生物能源项目。因此,将可持续衍生的林业生物量、能源生产和减缓气候变化的目标联系起来,是一个明显的、不发达的机会。 将生物能源的潜力与实际项目开发进行比较,尤其是与太阳能和风能等其他可再生能源相比,生物能源在澳大利亚可以被视为“被遗忘的可再生能源”。生物能源在提供急需的可调度能源方面比太阳能和风能等间歇性可再生能源具有优势,在稳定电网供应方面也发挥着重要作用,尤其是在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forestry, bioenergy and climate – a way forward in Australia
Sustainable forest management ensures that biomass removals do not exceed forest growth, maintaining stable carbon stocks. When biomass created as a byproduct of tree-harvesting for sawlogs or pulp is used for bioenergy generation, the carbon emitted in this process is re-absorbed by growing trees as part of the natural carbon cycling in sustainably managed forests. Thus, the use of biomass for bioenergy generation can make an important contribution to climate change mitigation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. Bioenergy can broadly be classified into three key end-use categories: electricity, heat and transport fuels. In Australia, many small electricity-generation units are fuelled by biomass, and a number of larger grid-scale facilities are accredited to generate renewable energy credits under the Large Scale Renewable Energy Target (RET) scheme. The majority of these facilities use sugarcane bagasse as feedstock. A small amount of biomass is also cofired with coal (e.g. at the Vales Point power station in New South Wales – NSW). Some domestic facilities (e.g. Altus Renewables in Queensland) produce pellets from sawmill residues, with the pellets exported for use in power stations overseas. There is significant use of wood for domestic heating and also for industrial applications—in sawmills, for example, residues are used in boilers to generate heat for drying timber. It is likely that interest in the use of biomass for heat in industrial applications to displace fossil fuels would increase if current renewable energy incentives such as the RET also included allowances for heat generation; currently, however, the RET only covers electricity generation. There has been some interest in liquid transport fuel applications from woody material (e.g. jet fuel) but little tangible progress—although Boral in NSW recently investigated the potential for the production of renewable diesel from hardwood sawmill residues. Despite its potential, the development of a thriving bioenergy industry in Australia supported by biomass from sustainable forestry operations has not yet eventuated. There has been much promise, but numerous projects have ultimately failed. A number of recognised factors are linked to this chequered history, including issues with the regulatory environment, a lack of consistent policy signals, issues of social licence, misconceptions about the climate benefits of bioenergy, and poor access to information on available technology options. It is important to distinguish the various potential sources of forestry-derived biomass, which include residues from the harvesting of trees for higher-value products; biomass from dedicated energy crops; and residues from wood-processing facilities and end-of-life materials (e.g. construction and demolition – C&D – waste). The issue of sustainability is often raised when considering the use of forest harvest residues for bioenergy, including around the debate on climate benefits. Nevertheless, it is commonly accepted that forest bioenergy can deliver meaningful climate benefits if it displaces the use of fossil fuels and if the biomass is sourced from residues from sustainable forest operations or from energy crops established on marginal, unproductive land (e.g. Reid et al. 2019). Other concerns around the use of biomass for energy include the impact of residue removals on the future nutritional needs of the forest and the impacts on biodiversity caused by habitat removal. For native forests, a recent study in NSW demonstrated that it is possible to remove substantial quantities of harvest residues with minimal impact on future nutritional needs or habitat (Ximenes, Coburn et al. 2017). In plantations, the removal of residues for bioenergy may mean that fertiliser must be added in later rotations—this becomes a management decision. In Scandinavian countries, the high-nutrient ash obtained from the combustion of biomass is returned to the forest—in Sweden, around 50 000 tonnes of clean wood ash is spread each year in forests in the southern provinces (IRENA 2019). Large volumes of residues are generated during forest harvesting and also at wood-processing facilities. The ‘Australian Biomass for Bioenergy Assessment’ project has quantified and mapped organic residues from many sources, including sustainable forestry operations – at least 2 million tonnes of residues per year are generated during the harvesting and processing of wood in NSW alone. Although the bulk of forestry residues is derived from harvesting operations, localised opportunities exist associated with processing residues from sawmills and also from end-of-life timber products (e.g. C&D waste), which would otherwise be placed in landfills. This resource is currently underused and potentially available for bioenergy projects. Thus, there is a clear, underdeveloped opportunity that links sustainably derived forestry biomass, energy generation and climate change mitigation goals. Bioenergy can be considered the ‘forgotten renewable’ in Australia when its potential is compared to actual project development, especially in relation to other renewables such as solar and wind. Bioenergy has an advantage over intermittent renewables such as solar and wind in its ability to provide much-needed dispatchable energy, and it also has an important role to play in stabilising supply to the electricity grid, especially as the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Forestry is published by Taylor & Francis for the Institute of Foresters of Australia (IFA) for scientific, technical, and professional communication relating to forestry in the Asia Pacific.
期刊最新文献
Form factors and volume models for Falcataria moluccana in smallholder plantations, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Effect of site, silviculture and tree social status on internal checking variation in plantation-grown Eucalyptus nitens Variation in adaptation and growth among Corymbia citriodora natural-stand and landrace seed sources in southern China Constructing a non-linear additive crown-width model system for moso bamboo forests in eastern China Domestication, restoration and sustainable use of Indonesian sandalwood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1