跨国视角下合作解决问题技能的性别差异。

IF 5.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1037/edu0000788
F. Borgonovi, S. Han, Samuel Greiff
{"title":"跨国视角下合作解决问题技能的性别差异。","authors":"F. Borgonovi, S. Han, Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1037/edu0000788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective collaborative problem solving comprises cognitive dimensions, in which men tend to outperform women,andsocialdimensionsinwhichwomentendtooutperformmen.Weextendresearchonbetween-coun- trydifferencesingendergapsbyconsideringcollaborativeproblemsolvinganditsassociationwithtwoindi-cators of societal-level gender inequality. The first indicator reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in the labor market and politics. The second reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically masculine fields and men ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically feminine fields among university students. We use cross-country evidence on collaborative problem-solving skills among 15-year-oldstudents from44 countries ( N = 343,326) who participated in the 2015 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Girls outperform boys in collaborative problem solving in all countries. Gender gaps in collaborative problem solving in favorof girls are less pronounced in countries wherewomen are especially underrepresented in the labor market and politics but more pronounced in countries where men and women are more likely to conform to gender stereotypes in selecting afield of studyat university. Societal-level genderequality plays a bigger role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of girls — such as collaborative problem solving and, to a lesser extent, reading — and a smaller role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of boys — such as mathematics.","PeriodicalId":48459,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in collaborative problem-solving skills in a cross-country perspective.\",\"authors\":\"F. Borgonovi, S. Han, Samuel Greiff\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/edu0000788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective collaborative problem solving comprises cognitive dimensions, in which men tend to outperform women,andsocialdimensionsinwhichwomentendtooutperformmen.Weextendresearchonbetween-coun- trydifferencesingendergapsbyconsideringcollaborativeproblemsolvinganditsassociationwithtwoindi-cators of societal-level gender inequality. The first indicator reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in the labor market and politics. The second reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically masculine fields and men ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically feminine fields among university students. We use cross-country evidence on collaborative problem-solving skills among 15-year-oldstudents from44 countries ( N = 343,326) who participated in the 2015 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Girls outperform boys in collaborative problem solving in all countries. Gender gaps in collaborative problem solving in favorof girls are less pronounced in countries wherewomen are especially underrepresented in the labor market and politics but more pronounced in countries where men and women are more likely to conform to gender stereotypes in selecting afield of studyat university. Societal-level genderequality plays a bigger role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of girls — such as collaborative problem solving and, to a lesser extent, reading — and a smaller role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of boys — such as mathematics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000788\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的合作解决问题包括认知维度和社会维度,在认知维度中,男性往往优于女性,而在社会维度中,女性往往表现不佳。我们在两个社会层面的性别不平等指标之间进行了广泛的研究,试图通过合作解决社会问题来缩小差距。第一个指标反映了妇女在劳动力市场和政治中的代表性不足。第二个反映了大学生中女性在刻板男性领域的代表性不足,而男性在刻板女性领域的代表率不足。我们使用了来自44个国家(N=343326)的15岁学生合作解决问题技能的跨国证据,这些学生参加了2015年国际学生评估计划(PISA)。在所有国家,女孩在合作解决问题方面都胜过男孩。在女性在劳动力市场和政治中的代表性特别低的国家,最喜欢女孩的合作解决问题中的性别差距不那么明显,但在男性和女性在选择大学学习领域时更可能遵循性别陈规定型观念的国家,性别差距更为明显。社会层面的性别素质在解释国家之间在性别差距有利于女孩的领域(如合作解决问题,以及在较小程度上的阅读)的成就差异方面发挥着更大的作用,而在解释国家间在性别差距有利男孩的领域(例如数学)的成就差距方面发挥着较小的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender differences in collaborative problem-solving skills in a cross-country perspective.
Effective collaborative problem solving comprises cognitive dimensions, in which men tend to outperform women,andsocialdimensionsinwhichwomentendtooutperformmen.Weextendresearchonbetween-coun- trydifferencesingendergapsbyconsideringcollaborativeproblemsolvinganditsassociationwithtwoindi-cators of societal-level gender inequality. The first indicator reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in the labor market and politics. The second reflects women ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically masculine fields and men ’ s underrepresentation in stereotypically feminine fields among university students. We use cross-country evidence on collaborative problem-solving skills among 15-year-oldstudents from44 countries ( N = 343,326) who participated in the 2015 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Girls outperform boys in collaborative problem solving in all countries. Gender gaps in collaborative problem solving in favorof girls are less pronounced in countries wherewomen are especially underrepresented in the labor market and politics but more pronounced in countries where men and women are more likely to conform to gender stereotypes in selecting afield of studyat university. Societal-level genderequality plays a bigger role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of girls — such as collaborative problem solving and, to a lesser extent, reading — and a smaller role in explaining between-country differences in achievement in domains with a gender gap in favor of boys — such as mathematics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Psychology
Journal of Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: The main purpose of the Journal of Educational Psychology® is to publish original, primary psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels. A secondary purpose of the Journal is the occasional publication of exceptionally important theoretical and review articles that are pertinent to educational psychology. Please note, the Journal does not typically publish reliability and validity studies of specific tests or assessment instruments.
期刊最新文献
Classroom learning climate profiles: Combining classroom goal structure and social climate to support student school functioning and behavioral adaptation. Reading for university or for myself? Effects of context and beliefs about science on college students’ document selection. The relation between prior knowledge and learning in regular and gifted classes: A multigroup latent growth curve analysis. Supplemental Material for Classroom Learning Climate Profiles: Combining Classroom Goal Structure and Social Climate to Support Student School Functioning and Behavioral Adaptation Supplemental Material for The Relation Between Prior Knowledge and Learning in Regular and Gifted Classes: A Multigroup Latent Growth Curve Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1