非整倍体植入前基因检测可改善重复植入失败患者的临床结果

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive and Developmental Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-21 DOI:10.1097/RD9.0000000000000043
Ruihuan Gu, Jing Fu, Naidong Ge, Zhichao Li, Bin Huang, Yan Xu, Yao-Yu Zou, Lu Li, Yi-juan Sun, Xiao-Xi Sun
{"title":"非整倍体植入前基因检测可改善重复植入失败患者的临床结果","authors":"Ruihuan Gu, Jing Fu, Naidong Ge, Zhichao Li, Bin Huang, Yan Xu, Yao-Yu Zou, Lu Li, Yi-juan Sun, Xiao-Xi Sun","doi":"10.1097/RD9.0000000000000043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study is to study whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the clinical outcomes of infertile patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of clinical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage rates, and obstetric and perinatal outcomes of women with RIF with or without PGT-A. Statistical analyses of categorical data were performed using propensity score matching (PSM), χ2 test, and Student’s t test. Results: We enrolled 466 patients with RIF, of which, 209 were in the RIF-PGT-A group. The rate of euploid blastocysts was significantly associated with age and day 5 or 6 blastocysts. There were significant differences between the RIF-PGT-A group and the RIF-non-PGT-A group across several parameters. After PSM, positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (56.9% and 33.9%, P <0.01), clinical pregnancy (49.5% and 31.2%, P <0.01), live birth (43.1% and 25.7%, P <0.01), and fetal heart rates (50.0% and 29.8%, P <0.01) per transfer were significantly higher in the RIF-PGT-A group. Conclusion: Elective single-embryo transfer PGT-A can minimize the risk of obstetric and perinatal outcomes, especially fetal body weight, in women with RIF. Additionally, PGT-A can significantly improve pregnancy and live birth rates.","PeriodicalId":20959,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":"12 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy improves clinical outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure\",\"authors\":\"Ruihuan Gu, Jing Fu, Naidong Ge, Zhichao Li, Bin Huang, Yan Xu, Yao-Yu Zou, Lu Li, Yi-juan Sun, Xiao-Xi Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RD9.0000000000000043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of this study is to study whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the clinical outcomes of infertile patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of clinical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage rates, and obstetric and perinatal outcomes of women with RIF with or without PGT-A. Statistical analyses of categorical data were performed using propensity score matching (PSM), χ2 test, and Student’s t test. Results: We enrolled 466 patients with RIF, of which, 209 were in the RIF-PGT-A group. The rate of euploid blastocysts was significantly associated with age and day 5 or 6 blastocysts. There were significant differences between the RIF-PGT-A group and the RIF-non-PGT-A group across several parameters. After PSM, positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (56.9% and 33.9%, P <0.01), clinical pregnancy (49.5% and 31.2%, P <0.01), live birth (43.1% and 25.7%, P <0.01), and fetal heart rates (50.0% and 29.8%, P <0.01) per transfer were significantly higher in the RIF-PGT-A group. Conclusion: Elective single-embryo transfer PGT-A can minimize the risk of obstetric and perinatal outcomes, especially fetal body weight, in women with RIF. Additionally, PGT-A can significantly improve pregnancy and live birth rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"12 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RD9.0000000000000043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RD9.0000000000000043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是研究胚胎植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)是否能改善反复着床失败(RIF)患者进行冻融胚胎移植的临床结果。方法:回顾性分析有或没有PGT-A的RIF妇女的临床妊娠、活产、流产率、产科和围产期结局。分类资料的统计分析采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)、χ2检验和Student’s t检验。结果:我们纳入了466例RIF患者,其中209例为RIF- pgt - a组。整倍体囊胚率与年龄和第5天或第6天囊胚率显著相关。RIF-PGT-A组和rif -非pgt - a组在几个参数上存在显著差异。PSM后,RIF-PGT-A组血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素阳性率(56.9%和33.9%,P <0.01)、临床妊娠率(49.5%和31.2%,P <0.01)、活产率(43.1%和25.7%,P <0.01)和胎心率(50.0%和29.8%,P <0.01)均显著高于PSM组。结论:选择性单胚胎移植PGT-A可以将RIF妇女的产科和围产期结局,特别是胎儿体重的风险降至最低。此外,PGT-A可以显著提高妊娠率和活产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy improves clinical outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure
Objective: The objective of this study is to study whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the clinical outcomes of infertile patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of clinical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage rates, and obstetric and perinatal outcomes of women with RIF with or without PGT-A. Statistical analyses of categorical data were performed using propensity score matching (PSM), χ2 test, and Student’s t test. Results: We enrolled 466 patients with RIF, of which, 209 were in the RIF-PGT-A group. The rate of euploid blastocysts was significantly associated with age and day 5 or 6 blastocysts. There were significant differences between the RIF-PGT-A group and the RIF-non-PGT-A group across several parameters. After PSM, positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (56.9% and 33.9%, P <0.01), clinical pregnancy (49.5% and 31.2%, P <0.01), live birth (43.1% and 25.7%, P <0.01), and fetal heart rates (50.0% and 29.8%, P <0.01) per transfer were significantly higher in the RIF-PGT-A group. Conclusion: Elective single-embryo transfer PGT-A can minimize the risk of obstetric and perinatal outcomes, especially fetal body weight, in women with RIF. Additionally, PGT-A can significantly improve pregnancy and live birth rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
384
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exogenous estrogen partially rescues progesterone deficiency and autophagosome enlargement in Mcoln1 -/- mouse model with lysosomal storage disorder. Study of the influence of the biochemical composition of the human native ejaculate on the preservation of the male gametes’ activity after the application of cryopreservation technology Impact of Microbiota on Female Fertility and Gynecological problems Machine learning-based prediction of pregnancy outcomes in couples with non-obstructive azoospermia using micro-TESE for ICSI: a retrospective cohort study Text mining and data analysis identifies potential drugs and pathways for polycystic ovary syndrome treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1