在COVID-19大流行期间,工作保障和促进工人福祉:一项针对加拿大工人的研究,该研究在采取社交距离措施一到两周后进行

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Wellbeing Pub Date : 2020-08-12 DOI:10.5502/IJW.V10I3.1321
Tyler Pacheco, S. Coulombe, Christine Khalil, S. Meunier, M. Doucerain, Émilie Auger, Emily Cox
{"title":"在COVID-19大流行期间,工作保障和促进工人福祉:一项针对加拿大工人的研究,该研究在采取社交距离措施一到两周后进行","authors":"Tyler Pacheco, S. Coulombe, Christine Khalil, S. Meunier, M. Doucerain, Émilie Auger, Emily Cox","doi":"10.5502/IJW.V10I3.1321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Due to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis, workplaces have had to make significant alterations in the way they conduct business. This, in addition to the current financial instability, may put workers at risk of experiencing job insecurity and, in turn, lower wellbeing. Job insecurity is a key determinant of wellbeing, but little is known on how it is impacted by public health crises, and more specifically how it relates to workers’ positive and negative wellbeing in the midst of a pandemic. Research is lacking on resilience levers that workplace interventions should target to support wellbeing in times of insecurity. Objective: Framed from a multidisciplinary perspective (public health, positive and organizational psychology), the study explores (1) workers’ job (in)security during the COVID-19 pandemic one to two weeks after social distancing measures were implemented by Canadian governments, (2) how job (in)security relates to wellbeing during the pandemic, and (3) the potential positive effects of workplace-related resilience levers. Method: 1,073 Canadian workers working full-/part-time or who were temporarily laid off completed an online survey, including measures of wellbeing at work or in general, job security and potential resilience levers (workplace disaster preparedness, policy, social capital). Results: Multiple regression findings highlight that marginalized workers (e.g., women, migrants, people facing financial hardships) reported lower job security, and having temporarily lost one’s job was negatively associated with job security. Low job security was related to lower scores across measures of wellbeing. Distress was high in the sample. Workplace disaster preparedness, policy and social capital were associated with higher wellbeing. The effects of these resilience levers tended to be stronger at higher job security levels. Discussion: Recommendations include a systemic, collaborative approach that includes policies fostering job security as well as resilience-promoting interventions in the workplace to protect/increase the wellbeing of workers during COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Job security and the promotion of workers’ wellbeing in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: A study with Canadian workers one to two weeks after the initiation of social distancing measures\",\"authors\":\"Tyler Pacheco, S. Coulombe, Christine Khalil, S. Meunier, M. Doucerain, Émilie Auger, Emily Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.5502/IJW.V10I3.1321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Due to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis, workplaces have had to make significant alterations in the way they conduct business. This, in addition to the current financial instability, may put workers at risk of experiencing job insecurity and, in turn, lower wellbeing. Job insecurity is a key determinant of wellbeing, but little is known on how it is impacted by public health crises, and more specifically how it relates to workers’ positive and negative wellbeing in the midst of a pandemic. Research is lacking on resilience levers that workplace interventions should target to support wellbeing in times of insecurity. Objective: Framed from a multidisciplinary perspective (public health, positive and organizational psychology), the study explores (1) workers’ job (in)security during the COVID-19 pandemic one to two weeks after social distancing measures were implemented by Canadian governments, (2) how job (in)security relates to wellbeing during the pandemic, and (3) the potential positive effects of workplace-related resilience levers. Method: 1,073 Canadian workers working full-/part-time or who were temporarily laid off completed an online survey, including measures of wellbeing at work or in general, job security and potential resilience levers (workplace disaster preparedness, policy, social capital). Results: Multiple regression findings highlight that marginalized workers (e.g., women, migrants, people facing financial hardships) reported lower job security, and having temporarily lost one’s job was negatively associated with job security. Low job security was related to lower scores across measures of wellbeing. Distress was high in the sample. Workplace disaster preparedness, policy and social capital were associated with higher wellbeing. The effects of these resilience levers tended to be stronger at higher job security levels. Discussion: Recommendations include a systemic, collaborative approach that includes policies fostering job security as well as resilience-promoting interventions in the workplace to protect/increase the wellbeing of workers during COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Wellbeing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Wellbeing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5502/IJW.V10I3.1321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wellbeing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5502/IJW.V10I3.1321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

背景:由于当前的冠状病毒(COVID-19)危机,工作场所不得不在开展业务的方式上做出重大改变。再加上目前的金融不稳定,这可能会让员工面临工作不稳定的风险,进而降低幸福感。工作不安全感是幸福感的一个关键决定因素,但人们对它如何受到公共卫生危机的影响知之甚少,更具体地说,在大流行期间,它与工人的积极和消极幸福感有何关系。在不安全时期,工作场所的干预措施应该针对弹性杠杆来支持幸福感,但目前缺乏这方面的研究。目的:从多学科的角度(公共卫生、积极心理学和组织心理学)出发,本研究探讨了(1)加拿大政府实施社会距离措施一到两周后,COVID-19大流行期间工人的工作安全问题;(2)大流行期间工作安全与幸福感的关系;(3)与工作场所相关的弹性杠杆的潜在积极影响。方法:1073名全职/兼职工作或暂时失业的加拿大工人完成了一项在线调查,包括工作幸福感或总体幸福感、工作保障和潜在的弹性杠杆(工作场所备灾、政策、社会资本)。结果:多元回归结果强调,边缘化工人(如妇女、移民、面临经济困难的人)报告的工作安全性较低,暂时失业与工作安全性呈负相关。较低的工作安全感与较低的幸福指数有关。样本中的痛苦程度很高。工作场所的备灾、政策和社会资本与更高的幸福感有关。这些弹性杠杆的影响往往在较高的工作保障水平更强。讨论:建议包括一种系统的协作方法,其中包括促进工作保障的政策以及在工作场所促进复原力的干预措施,以在2019冠状病毒病期间保护/增加工人的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Job security and the promotion of workers’ wellbeing in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: A study with Canadian workers one to two weeks after the initiation of social distancing measures
Background: Due to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis, workplaces have had to make significant alterations in the way they conduct business. This, in addition to the current financial instability, may put workers at risk of experiencing job insecurity and, in turn, lower wellbeing. Job insecurity is a key determinant of wellbeing, but little is known on how it is impacted by public health crises, and more specifically how it relates to workers’ positive and negative wellbeing in the midst of a pandemic. Research is lacking on resilience levers that workplace interventions should target to support wellbeing in times of insecurity. Objective: Framed from a multidisciplinary perspective (public health, positive and organizational psychology), the study explores (1) workers’ job (in)security during the COVID-19 pandemic one to two weeks after social distancing measures were implemented by Canadian governments, (2) how job (in)security relates to wellbeing during the pandemic, and (3) the potential positive effects of workplace-related resilience levers. Method: 1,073 Canadian workers working full-/part-time or who were temporarily laid off completed an online survey, including measures of wellbeing at work or in general, job security and potential resilience levers (workplace disaster preparedness, policy, social capital). Results: Multiple regression findings highlight that marginalized workers (e.g., women, migrants, people facing financial hardships) reported lower job security, and having temporarily lost one’s job was negatively associated with job security. Low job security was related to lower scores across measures of wellbeing. Distress was high in the sample. Workplace disaster preparedness, policy and social capital were associated with higher wellbeing. The effects of these resilience levers tended to be stronger at higher job security levels. Discussion: Recommendations include a systemic, collaborative approach that includes policies fostering job security as well as resilience-promoting interventions in the workplace to protect/increase the wellbeing of workers during COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Wellbeing
International Journal of Wellbeing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A provisional global comparison framework: One hundred psychologically salient ways of conceptualizing and evaluating the world Beyond a single story: The heterogeneity of human flourishing in 22 countries The brief thriving scale: Assessing the ability to learn, grow, and find benefits in stressful events Well-being and ill-being on campus Brief computerised self-help interventions, the “Miracle Question,” and the moderating effects of openness-to-experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1