德克萨斯州堕胎法案作者的社会政治背景更正

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Social Currents Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1177/2329496521995624
{"title":"德克萨斯州堕胎法案作者的社会政治背景更正","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/2329496521995624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2The dependent variable is the count of bills that restrict abortion that a legislator signed on as a primary, joint, or coauthor during a given panel. To identify relevant bills, we used the search function through the Texas Legislative Reference Library’s website to create a roster of bills for which the “Subject” is “abortion.” This search identified 251 bills. We reviewed the text of each of these bills to confirm that it pertains to the act of abortion, to funding for abortions, or otherwise concerns abortion seekers, providers, or facilities. We excluded two bills that did not meet these criteria. We also excluded 41 progressive bills that propose improved access to or the deregulation of abortion. Our dependent measure refers to authorship of the remaining 208 restrictive abortion bills (listed in Appendix). On average, a legislator authored 1.98 restrictive abortion bills per panel with a standard deviation of 3.89.","PeriodicalId":44139,"journal":{"name":"Social Currents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2329496521995624","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrigendum to The Sociopolitical Context of Abortion Bill Authorship in Texas\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2329496521995624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2The dependent variable is the count of bills that restrict abortion that a legislator signed on as a primary, joint, or coauthor during a given panel. To identify relevant bills, we used the search function through the Texas Legislative Reference Library’s website to create a roster of bills for which the “Subject” is “abortion.” This search identified 251 bills. We reviewed the text of each of these bills to confirm that it pertains to the act of abortion, to funding for abortions, or otherwise concerns abortion seekers, providers, or facilities. We excluded two bills that did not meet these criteria. We also excluded 41 progressive bills that propose improved access to or the deregulation of abortion. Our dependent measure refers to authorship of the remaining 208 restrictive abortion bills (listed in Appendix). On average, a legislator authored 1.98 restrictive abortion bills per panel with a standard deviation of 3.89.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Currents\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2329496521995624\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Currents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496521995624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496521995624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2因变量是立法者在特定小组中作为主要、联合或合著者签署的限制堕胎法案的数量。为了确定相关法案,我们通过德克萨斯州立法参考图书馆的网站使用搜索功能创建了一个“主题”为“堕胎”的法案名册。此次搜索确定了251项法案。我们审查了每一项法案的文本,以确认它与堕胎行为、堕胎资金有关,或与堕胎寻求者、提供者或设施有关。我们排除了两项不符合这些标准的法案。我们还排除了41项提出改善堕胎机会或放松堕胎管制的进步法案。我们的从属衡量标准是指剩余208项限制性堕胎法案的作者(见附录)。平均而言,一名立法者每个小组起草了1.98项限制性堕胎法案,标准偏差为3.89。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corrigendum to The Sociopolitical Context of Abortion Bill Authorship in Texas
2The dependent variable is the count of bills that restrict abortion that a legislator signed on as a primary, joint, or coauthor during a given panel. To identify relevant bills, we used the search function through the Texas Legislative Reference Library’s website to create a roster of bills for which the “Subject” is “abortion.” This search identified 251 bills. We reviewed the text of each of these bills to confirm that it pertains to the act of abortion, to funding for abortions, or otherwise concerns abortion seekers, providers, or facilities. We excluded two bills that did not meet these criteria. We also excluded 41 progressive bills that propose improved access to or the deregulation of abortion. Our dependent measure refers to authorship of the remaining 208 restrictive abortion bills (listed in Appendix). On average, a legislator authored 1.98 restrictive abortion bills per panel with a standard deviation of 3.89.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Currents
Social Currents SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Social Currents, the official journal of the Southern Sociological Society, is a broad-ranging social science journal that focuses on cutting-edge research from all methodological and theoretical orientations with implications for national and international sociological communities. The uniqueness of Social Currents lies in its format. The front end of every issue is devoted to short, theoretical, agenda-setting contributions and brief, empirical and policy-related pieces. The back end of every issue includes standard journal articles that cover topics within specific subfields of sociology, as well as across the social sciences more broadly.
期刊最新文献
Returning from Prison to a Changed City: How Does Gentrification Shape the Employment and Housing Opportunities of Returning Citizens? Fight the Power? How Black Adults’ Racial Capital Associates With Their Political Activities Rent Burden and Demographic Change Among Veterans: A Research Brief “A Future for White Children”: Examining Family Ideologies of White Extremist Groups at the Intersection of Race and Gender The Impacts of Landscape Loss on Industrial Communities: Solastalgia in Coal Regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1