土耳其商科第一周期学位课程的课程单元数量和学生工作量的比较分析

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Tuning Journal for Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-05-28 DOI:10.18543/tjhe.1889
Haşmet Sarıgül, Hakan Eren Sengelen
{"title":"土耳其商科第一周期学位课程的课程单元数量和学生工作量的比较分析","authors":"Haşmet Sarıgül, Hakan Eren Sengelen","doi":"10.18543/tjhe.1889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comparative study aims to determine the differences between the curricula of the first cycle degree programmes in business in Turkey in terms of the number of course units and the student workloads. In this context, (1) the courses included in the Bologna course information packages of business schools on their web sites have been examined; (2) course units have been gathered together in content–related groups, (3) the numbers of course units in each content–related group have been determined, (4) total student workload of each content–related group has been determined by means of the institutionally allocated ECTS credits, (5) the differences between public and foundation business schools have been tested for each content–related group in terms of total number of course units and total student workload, and (6) the differences between the business schools using Turkish and those using a foreign language as the medium of instruction have been tested for each content–related group in terms of total number of courses and total student workload. The methods used in the research are document review and multivariate analysis. The data of 147 business schools has been used in the study and the outputs of the research reveal that there are significant differences in most of the content–related groups between both the business school groupings described above at points (5) and (6) in terms of the number of course units and student workload. \nReceived: 9 October 2020Accepted: 22 April 2022","PeriodicalId":53788,"journal":{"name":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of the first cycle degree programmes in business in Turkey in terms of the number of course units and the student workloads\",\"authors\":\"Haşmet Sarıgül, Hakan Eren Sengelen\",\"doi\":\"10.18543/tjhe.1889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This comparative study aims to determine the differences between the curricula of the first cycle degree programmes in business in Turkey in terms of the number of course units and the student workloads. In this context, (1) the courses included in the Bologna course information packages of business schools on their web sites have been examined; (2) course units have been gathered together in content–related groups, (3) the numbers of course units in each content–related group have been determined, (4) total student workload of each content–related group has been determined by means of the institutionally allocated ECTS credits, (5) the differences between public and foundation business schools have been tested for each content–related group in terms of total number of course units and total student workload, and (6) the differences between the business schools using Turkish and those using a foreign language as the medium of instruction have been tested for each content–related group in terms of total number of courses and total student workload. The methods used in the research are document review and multivariate analysis. The data of 147 business schools has been used in the study and the outputs of the research reveal that there are significant differences in most of the content–related groups between both the business school groupings described above at points (5) and (6) in terms of the number of course units and student workload. \\nReceived: 9 October 2020Accepted: 22 April 2022\",\"PeriodicalId\":53788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuning Journal for Higher Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuning Journal for Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.1889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.1889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项比较研究旨在确定土耳其第一周期商业学位课程在课程单元数量和学生工作量方面的差异。在这方面,(1)对商学院网站上博洛尼亚课程信息包中的课程进行了审查;(2) 课程单元被收集在内容相关组中,(3)每个内容相关组的课程单元数量已经确定,(4)每个内容关联组的总学生工作量已经通过机构分配的ECTS学分确定,(5)测试了公立商学院和基础商学院在课程单元总数和学生总工作量方面的差异,以及(6)在课程总数和学生总工作量方面,测试了使用土耳其语和使用外语作为教学媒介的商学院在每个内容相关组中的差异。研究中使用的方法是文献综述和多元分析。本研究使用了147所商学院的数据,研究结果表明,在上文第(5)点和第(6)点所述的商学院分组中,大多数内容相关组在课程单元数量和学生工作量方面存在显著差异。接收日期:2020年10月9日接受日期:2022年4月22日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative analysis of the first cycle degree programmes in business in Turkey in terms of the number of course units and the student workloads
This comparative study aims to determine the differences between the curricula of the first cycle degree programmes in business in Turkey in terms of the number of course units and the student workloads. In this context, (1) the courses included in the Bologna course information packages of business schools on their web sites have been examined; (2) course units have been gathered together in content–related groups, (3) the numbers of course units in each content–related group have been determined, (4) total student workload of each content–related group has been determined by means of the institutionally allocated ECTS credits, (5) the differences between public and foundation business schools have been tested for each content–related group in terms of total number of course units and total student workload, and (6) the differences between the business schools using Turkish and those using a foreign language as the medium of instruction have been tested for each content–related group in terms of total number of courses and total student workload. The methods used in the research are document review and multivariate analysis. The data of 147 business schools has been used in the study and the outputs of the research reveal that there are significant differences in most of the content–related groups between both the business school groupings described above at points (5) and (6) in terms of the number of course units and student workload. Received: 9 October 2020Accepted: 22 April 2022
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tuning Journal for Higher Education
Tuning Journal for Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Emerging strategies and challenges faced by professors during Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) at a Colombian university The effects of online learning self-efficacy and attitude toward online learning in predicting academic performance: The case of online prospective mathematics teachers Teaching in a COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions and practices of university faculty in Spain The early years The impact of an active-learning designed faculty development program: A students’ perspective of an Italian university
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1