在人工双语条件下,英语教授/教员培训的结果

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science Pub Date : 2017-10-19 DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2017-8-188-203
Татьяна Павловна Рассказова, Наталья Степановна Глуханюк, Мария Олеговна Гузикова
{"title":"在人工双语条件下,英语教授/教员培训的结果","authors":"Татьяна Павловна Рассказова, Наталья Степановна Глуханюк, Мария Олеговна Гузикова","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2017-8-188-203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In the conditions of the modern globalization, one of the most significant indicators of competitiveness of the universities is the academic mobility of students, graduate students, teachers and research associates that implies their free and competent enough foreign language skills, first of all English. Yet, until recently, comparatively little attention has been paid to foreign language skills of the Russian academic teaching staff. However, in recent years, with regard to the process acceleration of internationalization of the higher education to provide own effective functioning and remain a demanded one in education and training market, domestic higher education institutions are forced to quickly fill in the gaps of foreign language knowledge among academic teaching staff. The aim of this article is to analyse and describe the tuition outcomes for academic teaching staff based on the official exam results from Cambridge English Language Assessment for three years (2015–2017). Methodology and research methods. The research, which is grounded in interdisciplinary approach and lies at the intersection of psychology, linguistics and pedagogics, was conducted on the basis of the statistical analysis and generalization of mean scores of English language testing results, taking into account qualitative and quantitative standards of speech skills: reading, writing, listening, speaking and use of English (for levels B2, C1). Results and scientific novelty. The essential strengthening and development of the Cambridge English system for level increase of proficiency in English among the Russian academic teaching staff is proved. The data of external peer evaluation provided by exam centre Cambridge English Language Assessment including the foreign language training results of academic teaching staff are analysed. The results obtained show that contrary to the wide-spread opinion that productive skills (speaking and writing) take longer to develop and are difficult to acquire, university teachers demonstrate a different trend: the worst developed skill is listening, then comes reading, writing and speaking. Practical significance. The research provided in the article gives additional understanding of specifics of English training for adults, namely academic teaching staff, and features of their cognitive age processes when foreign language skills acquisition. The materials of the presented publication will be useful to teachers of a foreign language and higher education institution authorities while organizing additional learning foreign languages education in the conditions of artificial bilingualism, also, when teaching programmes updating for the purpose of strengthening of its efficiency.","PeriodicalId":44143,"journal":{"name":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"188-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ОБУЧЕНИЯ ПРОФЕССОРСКО- ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛЬСКОГО СОСТАВА АНГЛИЙСКОМУ ЯЗЫКУ В УСЛОВИЯХ ИСКУССТВЕННОГО БИЛИНГВИЗМА\",\"authors\":\"Татьяна Павловна Рассказова, Наталья Степановна Глуханюк, Мария Олеговна Гузикова\",\"doi\":\"10.17853/1994-5639-2017-8-188-203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. In the conditions of the modern globalization, one of the most significant indicators of competitiveness of the universities is the academic mobility of students, graduate students, teachers and research associates that implies their free and competent enough foreign language skills, first of all English. Yet, until recently, comparatively little attention has been paid to foreign language skills of the Russian academic teaching staff. However, in recent years, with regard to the process acceleration of internationalization of the higher education to provide own effective functioning and remain a demanded one in education and training market, domestic higher education institutions are forced to quickly fill in the gaps of foreign language knowledge among academic teaching staff. The aim of this article is to analyse and describe the tuition outcomes for academic teaching staff based on the official exam results from Cambridge English Language Assessment for three years (2015–2017). Methodology and research methods. The research, which is grounded in interdisciplinary approach and lies at the intersection of psychology, linguistics and pedagogics, was conducted on the basis of the statistical analysis and generalization of mean scores of English language testing results, taking into account qualitative and quantitative standards of speech skills: reading, writing, listening, speaking and use of English (for levels B2, C1). Results and scientific novelty. The essential strengthening and development of the Cambridge English system for level increase of proficiency in English among the Russian academic teaching staff is proved. The data of external peer evaluation provided by exam centre Cambridge English Language Assessment including the foreign language training results of academic teaching staff are analysed. The results obtained show that contrary to the wide-spread opinion that productive skills (speaking and writing) take longer to develop and are difficult to acquire, university teachers demonstrate a different trend: the worst developed skill is listening, then comes reading, writing and speaking. Practical significance. The research provided in the article gives additional understanding of specifics of English training for adults, namely academic teaching staff, and features of their cognitive age processes when foreign language skills acquisition. The materials of the presented publication will be useful to teachers of a foreign language and higher education institution authorities while organizing additional learning foreign languages education in the conditions of artificial bilingualism, also, when teaching programmes updating for the purpose of strengthening of its efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"188-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-8-188-203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-8-188-203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。在现代全球化的条件下,大学竞争力最重要的指标之一是学生、研究生、教师和研究人员的学术流动性,这意味着他们拥有足够自由和称职的外语技能,首先是英语。然而,直到最近,对俄罗斯学术教学人员的外语技能的关注相对较少。然而,近年来,随着高等教育国际化进程的加快,为了保证自身的有效运行,保持教育培训市场的需求,国内高等教育不得不迅速填补学术教学人员的外语知识空白。本文的目的是根据剑桥英语语言评估三年(2015-2017年)的官方考试结果,分析和描述学术教学人员的学费结果。方法论和研究方法。该研究以跨学科方法为基础,涉及心理学、语言学和教育学的交叉,是在对英语语言测试结果的平均分数进行统计分析和概括的基础上进行的,同时考虑到语言技能的定性和定量标准:阅读、写作、听力、口语和英语使用(B2、C1级)。结果与科学新颖性。本文论证了加强和发展剑桥英语体系对于提高俄罗斯学术教师英语水平的重要性。本文分析了剑桥英语语言评估中心提供的外部同行评估数据,包括学术教学人员的外语培训结果。所获得的结果表明,与人们普遍认为的生产技能(口语和写作)需要更长的时间来发展并且很难获得相反,大学教师表现出不同的趋势:最不发达的技能是听力,然后是阅读,写作和口语。现实意义。本文提供的研究对成人英语培训的特点,即学术教学人员,以及他们在外语技能习得过程中的认知年龄过程的特点有了进一步的了解。本出版物的材料将对外语教师和高等教育机构当局有用,同时在人工双语条件下组织额外的学习外语教育,以及在更新教学方案以加强其效率时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ОБУЧЕНИЯ ПРОФЕССОРСКО- ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛЬСКОГО СОСТАВА АНГЛИЙСКОМУ ЯЗЫКУ В УСЛОВИЯХ ИСКУССТВЕННОГО БИЛИНГВИЗМА
Introduction. In the conditions of the modern globalization, one of the most significant indicators of competitiveness of the universities is the academic mobility of students, graduate students, teachers and research associates that implies their free and competent enough foreign language skills, first of all English. Yet, until recently, comparatively little attention has been paid to foreign language skills of the Russian academic teaching staff. However, in recent years, with regard to the process acceleration of internationalization of the higher education to provide own effective functioning and remain a demanded one in education and training market, domestic higher education institutions are forced to quickly fill in the gaps of foreign language knowledge among academic teaching staff. The aim of this article is to analyse and describe the tuition outcomes for academic teaching staff based on the official exam results from Cambridge English Language Assessment for three years (2015–2017). Methodology and research methods. The research, which is grounded in interdisciplinary approach and lies at the intersection of psychology, linguistics and pedagogics, was conducted on the basis of the statistical analysis and generalization of mean scores of English language testing results, taking into account qualitative and quantitative standards of speech skills: reading, writing, listening, speaking and use of English (for levels B2, C1). Results and scientific novelty. The essential strengthening and development of the Cambridge English system for level increase of proficiency in English among the Russian academic teaching staff is proved. The data of external peer evaluation provided by exam centre Cambridge English Language Assessment including the foreign language training results of academic teaching staff are analysed. The results obtained show that contrary to the wide-spread opinion that productive skills (speaking and writing) take longer to develop and are difficult to acquire, university teachers demonstrate a different trend: the worst developed skill is listening, then comes reading, writing and speaking. Practical significance. The research provided in the article gives additional understanding of specifics of English training for adults, namely academic teaching staff, and features of their cognitive age processes when foreign language skills acquisition. The materials of the presented publication will be useful to teachers of a foreign language and higher education institution authorities while organizing additional learning foreign languages education in the conditions of artificial bilingualism, also, when teaching programmes updating for the purpose of strengthening of its efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ensuring the unity of the federal system of scientific and methodological support for teacher professional development: Opportunities and risks Influence of academic-professional hardiness on the subjective well-being of students in socionomic professions Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Bystander strategies Contemporary contexts of higher medical education development: Patient-centred care in medical students’ understanding Publication activity of Russian university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1