（什么时候）流言蜚语有基督徒的责任吗？

IF 0.2 4区哲学 0 RELIGION JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.5840/jsce202271858

M. Anderson

{"title":"（什么时候）流言蜚语有基督徒的责任吗？","authors":"M. Anderson","doi":"10.5840/jsce202271858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This paper offers a Thomistic defense of gossip as a licit means of protecting third parties from harm by known offenders. After first clarifying what constitutes gossip, it draws from Thomas Aquinas to identify the narrow set of conditions under which gossip might be both permissible and obligatory. It concludes by specifying how the duty to gossip might work in Christian institutions, and especially within institutions where there are weak systems of formal accountability.","PeriodicalId":43321,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(When) Is There a Christian Responsibility to Gossip?\",\"authors\":\"M. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/jsce202271858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This paper offers a Thomistic defense of gossip as a licit means of protecting third parties from harm by known offenders. After first clarifying what constitutes gossip, it draws from Thomas Aquinas to identify the narrow set of conditions under which gossip might be both permissible and obligatory. It concludes by specifying how the duty to gossip might work in Christian institutions, and especially within institutions where there are weak systems of formal accountability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/jsce202271858\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/jsce202271858","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要：本文对流言蜚语进行了托米斯式的辩护，将其作为保护第三方免受已知罪犯伤害的合法手段。在首先澄清了什么是八卦之后，它借鉴了托马斯·阿奎那的观点，确定了八卦既可以被允许，也可以被强制的狭窄条件。最后，它详细说明了在基督教机构中，尤其是在正式问责制度薄弱的机构中，八卦的义务是如何发挥作用的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

(When) Is There a Christian Responsibility to Gossip?

abstract:This paper offers a Thomistic defense of gossip as a licit means of protecting third parties from harm by known offenders. After first clarifying what constitutes gossip, it draws from Thomas Aquinas to identify the narrow set of conditions under which gossip might be both permissible and obligatory. It concludes by specifying how the duty to gossip might work in Christian institutions, and especially within institutions where there are weak systems of formal accountability.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量