泰恩赛德英语中的被动语态

IF 0.8 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS English World-Wide Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1075/eww.21039.feh
C. Fehringer
{"title":"泰恩赛德英语中的被动语态","authors":"C. Fehringer","doi":"10.1075/eww.21039.feh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper provides a quantitative variationist analysis of the distribution of get- versus\n be-passives in spoken Tyneside English. Taking data from the Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside\n English (1960s to 2010), the paper uses mixed-effects modelling to examine a wide range of possible constraints on\n the distribution of get versus be, some of which have been discussed at length in the literature\n on the get-passive (e.g. subject animacy, adversative semantics) and some of which have received less attention\n (e.g. grammatical person, tense, aspectuality). It demonstrates that the use of the get-passive is determined by\n a complex combination of semantic and syntactic factors (subject animacy, telicity, non-neutral semantics, tense and grammatical\n person). Moreover, it argues that, despite the dramatic rise in frequency of get-passives over time (with younger\n speakers using them even more frequently than be-passives), most of the constraints remain in place and the\n variant is pragmatically marked. This stands in sharp contrast to the findings of recent investigations into the\n grammaticalization of get-passives in standard British and American English, which found that increased frequency\n in those varieties was also accompanied by semantic bleaching and generalization.","PeriodicalId":45502,"journal":{"name":"English World-Wide","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The get-passive in Tyneside English\",\"authors\":\"C. Fehringer\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/eww.21039.feh\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper provides a quantitative variationist analysis of the distribution of get- versus\\n be-passives in spoken Tyneside English. Taking data from the Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside\\n English (1960s to 2010), the paper uses mixed-effects modelling to examine a wide range of possible constraints on\\n the distribution of get versus be, some of which have been discussed at length in the literature\\n on the get-passive (e.g. subject animacy, adversative semantics) and some of which have received less attention\\n (e.g. grammatical person, tense, aspectuality). It demonstrates that the use of the get-passive is determined by\\n a complex combination of semantic and syntactic factors (subject animacy, telicity, non-neutral semantics, tense and grammatical\\n person). Moreover, it argues that, despite the dramatic rise in frequency of get-passives over time (with younger\\n speakers using them even more frequently than be-passives), most of the constraints remain in place and the\\n variant is pragmatically marked. This stands in sharp contrast to the findings of recent investigations into the\\n grammaticalization of get-passives in standard British and American English, which found that increased frequency\\n in those varieties was also accompanied by semantic bleaching and generalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English World-Wide\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English World-Wide\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.21039.feh\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English World-Wide","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.21039.feh","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对泰恩赛德英语口语中被动语态get和被动语态be的分布进行了定量变异分析。从泰恩赛德英语历时电子语料库(1960年至2010年)中获取数据,本文使用混合效应模型来检查get与be分布的各种可能限制,其中一些在get-被动的文献中已经进行了详细的讨论(例如,主语动画,对立语义),而另一些则较少受到关注(例如,语法人物,时态,方面)。结果表明,被动语态的使用是由语义和句法因素(主语活泼性、目的性、非中性语义、时态和语法人称)的复杂组合决定的。此外,它还认为,尽管随着时间的推移,get-被动语态的使用频率急剧上升(年轻的说话者使用它们的频率甚至比be-被动语态还要高),但大多数限制仍然存在,并且这种变体具有实用主义特征。这与最近对标准英式英语和美式英语中get-passive的语法化的调查结果形成鲜明对比,后者发现,这些变体的频率增加也伴随着语义漂白和泛化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The get-passive in Tyneside English
This paper provides a quantitative variationist analysis of the distribution of get- versus be-passives in spoken Tyneside English. Taking data from the Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (1960s to 2010), the paper uses mixed-effects modelling to examine a wide range of possible constraints on the distribution of get versus be, some of which have been discussed at length in the literature on the get-passive (e.g. subject animacy, adversative semantics) and some of which have received less attention (e.g. grammatical person, tense, aspectuality). It demonstrates that the use of the get-passive is determined by a complex combination of semantic and syntactic factors (subject animacy, telicity, non-neutral semantics, tense and grammatical person). Moreover, it argues that, despite the dramatic rise in frequency of get-passives over time (with younger speakers using them even more frequently than be-passives), most of the constraints remain in place and the variant is pragmatically marked. This stands in sharp contrast to the findings of recent investigations into the grammaticalization of get-passives in standard British and American English, which found that increased frequency in those varieties was also accompanied by semantic bleaching and generalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
English World-Wide
English World-Wide Multiple-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: English World-Wide has established itself as the leading and most comprehensive journal dealing with varieties of English. The focus is on scholarly discussions of new findings in the dialectology and sociolinguistics of the English-speaking communities (native and second-language speakers), but general problems of sociolinguistics, creolistics, language planning, multilingualism and modern historical sociolinguistics are included if they have a direct bearing on modern varieties of English. Although teaching problems are normally excluded, English World-Wide provides important background information for all those involved in teaching English throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
Immigrants’ attitudes towards varieties of American English Constrained communication in EFL and ESL Revisiting the aspectual BUSY in (South African) English Prejudice towards regional accents of Philippine English Review of Wilson & Westphal (2023): New Englishes, New Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1