收回科学和公共卫生的叙述——挑战是巨大的(也是必要的)

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Behavior and Policy Review Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.14485/hbpr.9.5.1
R. McDermott
{"title":"收回科学和公共卫生的叙述——挑战是巨大的(也是必要的)","authors":"R. McDermott","doi":"10.14485/hbpr.9.5.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: My objective in this essay is to explore how scientists and non-scientists might better align their views, and thereby decrease the divide that separates these groups in the advancement, dissemination, and acceptance of knowledge. Methods: Various points of disagreement between scientists and the general public are presented, including how political affiliation and education level may influence beliefs. Results: Evidence is presented of a deepening gap between scientists and the general public on several key issues. Evidence is presented of a decline in science aspirations among youth and in educational achievement in general in the United States. If these events are accurate, they are ones that may widen the divide further. Conclusion: Some examples for improving the communication of science are presented. However, other views are invited so that the dialogue can be raised in both the science and general public communities.","PeriodicalId":44486,"journal":{"name":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking Back the Narrative in Science and Public Health – The Challenge is Enormous (and Necessary)\",\"authors\":\"R. McDermott\",\"doi\":\"10.14485/hbpr.9.5.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: My objective in this essay is to explore how scientists and non-scientists might better align their views, and thereby decrease the divide that separates these groups in the advancement, dissemination, and acceptance of knowledge. Methods: Various points of disagreement between scientists and the general public are presented, including how political affiliation and education level may influence beliefs. Results: Evidence is presented of a deepening gap between scientists and the general public on several key issues. Evidence is presented of a decline in science aspirations among youth and in educational achievement in general in the United States. If these events are accurate, they are ones that may widen the divide further. Conclusion: Some examples for improving the communication of science are presented. However, other views are invited so that the dialogue can be raised in both the science and general public communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Behavior and Policy Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Behavior and Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14485/hbpr.9.5.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14485/hbpr.9.5.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我在这篇文章中的目的是探索科学家和非科学家如何更好地协调他们的观点,从而减少这些群体在知识的进步、传播和接受方面的分歧。方法:提出了科学家与普通公众之间的不同观点,包括政治派别和教育水平如何影响信仰。结果:有证据表明,在几个关键问题上,科学家和公众之间的差距正在加深。有证据表明,在美国,年轻人对科学的渴望和教育成就总体上有所下降。如果这些事件是准确的,它们可能会进一步扩大分歧。结论:提出了改善科学传播的一些实例。但是,也邀请了其他观点,以便在科学界和一般公众社区中提出对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taking Back the Narrative in Science and Public Health – The Challenge is Enormous (and Necessary)
Objective: My objective in this essay is to explore how scientists and non-scientists might better align their views, and thereby decrease the divide that separates these groups in the advancement, dissemination, and acceptance of knowledge. Methods: Various points of disagreement between scientists and the general public are presented, including how political affiliation and education level may influence beliefs. Results: Evidence is presented of a deepening gap between scientists and the general public on several key issues. Evidence is presented of a decline in science aspirations among youth and in educational achievement in general in the United States. If these events are accurate, they are ones that may widen the divide further. Conclusion: Some examples for improving the communication of science are presented. However, other views are invited so that the dialogue can be raised in both the science and general public communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Behavior and Policy Review
Health Behavior and Policy Review PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
A Reflection on 10 Years of Health Behavior and Policy Review Health and Social Service Needs of People who Inject Drugs Living in Rural Settings in the United States: A Qualitative Study Total vs Partial Workplace Tobacco Use Bans in Texas Behavioral Health Centers: Employees’ Perceptions Related to Best Practices Implementation Improving Water Consumption in Underserved Elementary Schools: Implementation and Evaluation of a School-based Hydration Initiative Social Connections as a Catalyst for Improved Mental Health and Health Behavior among Long-term Survivors of HIV
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1