{"title":"政治生态学的转变——重回根来!","authors":"Helmut J. Geist","doi":"10.5194/gh-77-511-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Grown from radical geography roots, political ecology\n(PE) emerged half a century ago and is now a diverse, scientifically mature\nfield. In German speaking countries, geographical PE was introduced with a\ntime delay of twenty years. This article evaluates perspectives (views, arguments,\npositions) of the first generation of PE research in geography, i.e. largely\nstructuralist historical materialism and discursive approaches, and compares\nthem with second generation research, i.e. poststructuralist and, among\nothers, new (vital) materialism views. It is argued that, paradoxically\nenough, both old and new approaches are to be blamed for their ambivalence\ntowards policy (politics, activism, social praxis), while some new\napproaches face substantial criticism for their opaqueness and pluralist\ngrab bag character of themes. With a focus on emancipatory perspectives, a\ndistinct repositioning of (geographical) PE is suggested on radical roots,\ni.e. integrating libertarian Marxist ideas with anarchism so as to confront\nhierarchy/domination and enable direct actions for socioecological\ntransformation.\n","PeriodicalId":35649,"journal":{"name":"Geographica Helvetica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspektivenwechsel der Politischen Ökologie – Back to the roots!\",\"authors\":\"Helmut J. Geist\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gh-77-511-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Grown from radical geography roots, political ecology\\n(PE) emerged half a century ago and is now a diverse, scientifically mature\\nfield. In German speaking countries, geographical PE was introduced with a\\ntime delay of twenty years. This article evaluates perspectives (views, arguments,\\npositions) of the first generation of PE research in geography, i.e. largely\\nstructuralist historical materialism and discursive approaches, and compares\\nthem with second generation research, i.e. poststructuralist and, among\\nothers, new (vital) materialism views. It is argued that, paradoxically\\nenough, both old and new approaches are to be blamed for their ambivalence\\ntowards policy (politics, activism, social praxis), while some new\\napproaches face substantial criticism for their opaqueness and pluralist\\ngrab bag character of themes. With a focus on emancipatory perspectives, a\\ndistinct repositioning of (geographical) PE is suggested on radical roots,\\ni.e. integrating libertarian Marxist ideas with anarchism so as to confront\\nhierarchy/domination and enable direct actions for socioecological\\ntransformation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-511-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographica Helvetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-511-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perspektivenwechsel der Politischen Ökologie – Back to the roots!
Abstract. Grown from radical geography roots, political ecology
(PE) emerged half a century ago and is now a diverse, scientifically mature
field. In German speaking countries, geographical PE was introduced with a
time delay of twenty years. This article evaluates perspectives (views, arguments,
positions) of the first generation of PE research in geography, i.e. largely
structuralist historical materialism and discursive approaches, and compares
them with second generation research, i.e. poststructuralist and, among
others, new (vital) materialism views. It is argued that, paradoxically
enough, both old and new approaches are to be blamed for their ambivalence
towards policy (politics, activism, social praxis), while some new
approaches face substantial criticism for their opaqueness and pluralist
grab bag character of themes. With a focus on emancipatory perspectives, a
distinct repositioning of (geographical) PE is suggested on radical roots,
i.e. integrating libertarian Marxist ideas with anarchism so as to confront
hierarchy/domination and enable direct actions for socioecological
transformation.
期刊介绍:
Geographica Helvetica, the Swiss journal of geography, publishes contributions in all fields of geography as well as in related neighbouring disciplines. It is a multi-lingual journal, accepting articles in the three main Swiss languages, German, French, and Italian, as well as in English. It invites theoretical as well as empirical contributions. The journal welcomes contributions that specifically deal with empirical questions relating to Switzerland. The agenda of Geographica Helvetica is related to the specificity of Swiss geography as a meeting ground for different geographical traditions and languages (German, French, Italian and, more recently, a type of transnational, mainly English-speaking geography). The journal aims to become an ideal platform for the development of an informed, creative, and truly cosmopolitan geography. The journal will therefore provide space for cross-border theoretical debates around major thinkers – past and present – and the circulation of geographical ideas and concepts across Europe and beyond. The journal seeks to be a platform of debate also through innovative publication formats in its section "Interfaces", which publishes shorter interventions: reflection pieces on major thinkers as well as position papers (see manuscript types). Geographica Helvetica is promoted and supported by the following institutions: Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT), Geographic and Ethnological Society of Zurich/Geographisch-Ethnographische Gesellschaft Zürich (GEGZ), and Swiss Association of Geography/Association Suisse de Géographie (ASG).