骑自行车作为社会实践:关于城市中权力和交通的集体自我民族志

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Mobilities Pub Date : 2024-03-03 DOI:10.1080/17450101.2023.2211238
Léa Ravensbergen , Joanna Ilunga-Kapinga , Sabat Ismail , Aayesha Patel , Avet Khachatryan , Kevin Wong
{"title":"骑自行车作为社会实践:关于城市中权力和交通的集体自我民族志","authors":"Léa Ravensbergen ,&nbsp;Joanna Ilunga-Kapinga ,&nbsp;Sabat Ismail ,&nbsp;Aayesha Patel ,&nbsp;Avet Khachatryan ,&nbsp;Kevin Wong","doi":"10.1080/17450101.2023.2211238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cycling uptake is on the rise in many cities worldwide, yet inequalities remain in who is represented amongst urban cyclists with respect to gender, race, income, and other axes of social difference. Social Practice Theory (SPT), a framework wherein practices (such as cycling) are understood within three interrelated elements: competences, meanings, and materials, has often been used to understand cycling uptake, however, it has yet to engage fully in discussions on cycling equity. In this paper, we bring together the literature on cycling equity and SPT by arguing that cycling practices are shaped by uneven power relations. Using an auto-ethnographic process, four voices are presented to demonstrate how the competencies, meanings, and materials that shape cycling are embedded within intersecting power relations, such as patriarchy, automobility, classism, and racism. In doing so, we theoretically extend SPT by showing how it is embedded within uneven power relations and contribute to the literature on mobility justice and cycling equity by demonstrating some of the barriers to cycling amongst under-represented groups. We conclude by discussing how this framing can be applied to create more equitable—and just—cycling cities, focusing on cycling initiatives grounded in anti-racism and feminism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51457,"journal":{"name":"Mobilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cycling as social practice: a collective autoethnography on power and vélomobility in the city\",\"authors\":\"Léa Ravensbergen ,&nbsp;Joanna Ilunga-Kapinga ,&nbsp;Sabat Ismail ,&nbsp;Aayesha Patel ,&nbsp;Avet Khachatryan ,&nbsp;Kevin Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17450101.2023.2211238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cycling uptake is on the rise in many cities worldwide, yet inequalities remain in who is represented amongst urban cyclists with respect to gender, race, income, and other axes of social difference. Social Practice Theory (SPT), a framework wherein practices (such as cycling) are understood within three interrelated elements: competences, meanings, and materials, has often been used to understand cycling uptake, however, it has yet to engage fully in discussions on cycling equity. In this paper, we bring together the literature on cycling equity and SPT by arguing that cycling practices are shaped by uneven power relations. Using an auto-ethnographic process, four voices are presented to demonstrate how the competencies, meanings, and materials that shape cycling are embedded within intersecting power relations, such as patriarchy, automobility, classism, and racism. In doing so, we theoretically extend SPT by showing how it is embedded within uneven power relations and contribute to the literature on mobility justice and cycling equity by demonstrating some of the barriers to cycling amongst under-represented groups. We conclude by discussing how this framing can be applied to create more equitable—and just—cycling cities, focusing on cycling initiatives grounded in anti-racism and feminism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mobilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mobilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1745010123000966\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1745010123000966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球许多城市,骑自行车出行的人数都在增加,但城市骑车人在性别、种族、收入和其他社会差异方面仍存在不平等。社会实践理论(SPT)是一个将实践(如骑自行车)理解为能力、意义和材料这三个相互关联的要素的框架,经常被用来理解自行车的使用率,然而,该理论尚未充分参与有关自行车公平的讨论。在本文中,我们通过论证骑行实践是由不均衡的权力关系形成的,将有关骑行公平和 SPT 的文献结合在一起。本文采用自动民族志的方法,通过四种声音来展示形成自行车运动的能力、意义和材料是如何嵌入父权制、汽车流动性、阶级主义和种族主义等相互交叉的权力关系中的。在此过程中,我们从理论上对 SPT 进行了扩展,展示了它是如何嵌入到不均衡的权力关系中的,并通过展示代表性不足的群体在骑行过程中遇到的一些障碍,为有关流动性正义和骑行公平的文献做出了贡献。最后,我们讨论了如何将这一框架应用于创建更公平、更公正的自行车城市,重点关注以反种族主义和女权主义为基础的自行车倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cycling as social practice: a collective autoethnography on power and vélomobility in the city

Cycling uptake is on the rise in many cities worldwide, yet inequalities remain in who is represented amongst urban cyclists with respect to gender, race, income, and other axes of social difference. Social Practice Theory (SPT), a framework wherein practices (such as cycling) are understood within three interrelated elements: competences, meanings, and materials, has often been used to understand cycling uptake, however, it has yet to engage fully in discussions on cycling equity. In this paper, we bring together the literature on cycling equity and SPT by arguing that cycling practices are shaped by uneven power relations. Using an auto-ethnographic process, four voices are presented to demonstrate how the competencies, meanings, and materials that shape cycling are embedded within intersecting power relations, such as patriarchy, automobility, classism, and racism. In doing so, we theoretically extend SPT by showing how it is embedded within uneven power relations and contribute to the literature on mobility justice and cycling equity by demonstrating some of the barriers to cycling amongst under-represented groups. We conclude by discussing how this framing can be applied to create more equitable—and just—cycling cities, focusing on cycling initiatives grounded in anti-racism and feminism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mobilities
Mobilities Multiple-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Mobilities examines both the large-scale movements of people, objects, capital, and information across the world, as well as more local processes of daily transportation, movement through public and private spaces, and the travel of material things in everyday life. Recent developments in transportation and communications infrastructures, along with new social and cultural practices of mobility, present new challenges for the coordination and governance of mobilities and for the protection of mobility rights and access. This has elicited many new research methods and theories relevant for understanding the connections between diverse mobilities and immobilities.
期刊最新文献
Re-storying gendered im/mobilities through a mobile and generationed autoethnography The mobility biography of things and the climate emergency Driving while dreaming: oneiric automobility (Im)mobile autobiography: the mobilisation of life without children auto/biography and its significance Mobility practices in a changing climate: Understanding shifts in car ownership and use across the life course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1