Golovachev,Valentin Ts.,Pub。Lidia I.Golovacheva(1937–2011)-中国古代自主人格的产生问题:20世纪80年代苏中学者的讨论。

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY VOPROSY FILOSOFII Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI:10.21146/0042-8744-2023-3-176-183
V. Golovachev
{"title":"Golovachev,Valentin Ts.,Pub。Lidia I.Golovacheva(1937–2011)-中国古代自主人格的产生问题:20世纪80年代苏中学者的讨论。","authors":"V. Golovachev","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-3-176-183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1986, the pilot issue of the Kongzi yanjiu (Confucius Studies) Journal in China issued an article by Zhou Jizhi “Concerning the problem of self-consciousness of an individual in the ideas of Confucius and pre-Qin Confucianism”, followed by a special discussion. Jin Chunfeng, the Zhou’s opponent, repeating the com­mon arguments on different status of individuals in Ancient Greece and China during the genesis of philosophy, insisted that there were no conditions for the genesis of an autonomous human personality in China. In general, traditional ideas about the absence of personality in China during the Chunqiu-Zhanguo Era prevailed in China and foreign historical and philosophical science in the 1980s and early 1990s. However, these ideas are in many ways controversial and do not stand up to criticism. A comparison of answers by Confucius and the Ancient Greek thinkers to the “Challenge of the Epoch” reveals that the Confucius’ phi­losophy is freer from the mythological shell and answers the question more di­rectly. From this point of view, it cannot be considered less “mature” than the Antic concepts.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Golovachev, Valentin Ts., Pub. Lidia I. Golovacheva (1937–2011) – The Problem of the Genesis of an Autonomous Human Personality in Ancient China: Discussions of Soviet and Chinese Scholars in the 1980s.\",\"authors\":\"V. Golovachev\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-3-176-183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1986, the pilot issue of the Kongzi yanjiu (Confucius Studies) Journal in China issued an article by Zhou Jizhi “Concerning the problem of self-consciousness of an individual in the ideas of Confucius and pre-Qin Confucianism”, followed by a special discussion. Jin Chunfeng, the Zhou’s opponent, repeating the com­mon arguments on different status of individuals in Ancient Greece and China during the genesis of philosophy, insisted that there were no conditions for the genesis of an autonomous human personality in China. In general, traditional ideas about the absence of personality in China during the Chunqiu-Zhanguo Era prevailed in China and foreign historical and philosophical science in the 1980s and early 1990s. However, these ideas are in many ways controversial and do not stand up to criticism. A comparison of answers by Confucius and the Ancient Greek thinkers to the “Challenge of the Epoch” reveals that the Confucius’ phi­losophy is freer from the mythological shell and answers the question more di­rectly. From this point of view, it cannot be considered less “mature” than the Antic concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VOPROSY FILOSOFII\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VOPROSY FILOSOFII\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-3-176-183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-3-176-183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1986年,中国《孔子研究》杂志的试刊刊发了周继之的文章《论孔子与先秦儒家思想中的个体自我意识问题》,并进行了专题讨论。周氏的反对者金春风,重复了古希腊和中国哲学起源时期关于个体地位不同的常见论点,坚持认为中国不具备自主人格形成的条件。总的来说,在20世纪80年代和90年代初,关于春秋-战国时期中国人格缺失的传统观点在中外历史和哲学科学中盛行。然而,这些想法在很多方面是有争议的,经不起批评。对比孔子与古希腊思想家对“时代的挑战”的回答,可以发现孔子的哲学更自由地摆脱了神话的外壳,更直接地回答了问题。从这个角度来看,它不能被认为比Antic概念更“成熟”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Golovachev, Valentin Ts., Pub. Lidia I. Golovacheva (1937–2011) – The Problem of the Genesis of an Autonomous Human Personality in Ancient China: Discussions of Soviet and Chinese Scholars in the 1980s.
In 1986, the pilot issue of the Kongzi yanjiu (Confucius Studies) Journal in China issued an article by Zhou Jizhi “Concerning the problem of self-consciousness of an individual in the ideas of Confucius and pre-Qin Confucianism”, followed by a special discussion. Jin Chunfeng, the Zhou’s opponent, repeating the com­mon arguments on different status of individuals in Ancient Greece and China during the genesis of philosophy, insisted that there were no conditions for the genesis of an autonomous human personality in China. In general, traditional ideas about the absence of personality in China during the Chunqiu-Zhanguo Era prevailed in China and foreign historical and philosophical science in the 1980s and early 1990s. However, these ideas are in many ways controversial and do not stand up to criticism. A comparison of answers by Confucius and the Ancient Greek thinkers to the “Challenge of the Epoch” reveals that the Confucius’ phi­losophy is freer from the mythological shell and answers the question more di­rectly. From this point of view, it cannot be considered less “mature” than the Antic concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
期刊最新文献
The Guardian of the History of Philosophy: On Nelly Motroschilova’s Philosophical Beginnings Maimonides, Gersonides and Crescas on Prophets and Prophecy The Neurological Interpretation of the Myth-ritual Complex: Pro et Contra Worlds of Consciousness in the Context of Multiverse Conceptions Specifics of Expert Activity in Modern Applied Science (Review of Survey Results)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1