{"title":"承认权威","authors":"S. Suharman","doi":"10.19109/pairf.v2i2.5507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research studies are motivated by researchers interest in the impact and influence of religiosity on adolescent morals. Due to the current declining adolescent morals, so the need for this study to see how much influence the religiosity of coaching and the formation of adolescent morals \nThis study aims to determine whether there is an effect of regilisutas on adolescent morals. The type and approach of this study is research and quantitative approaches. The population used in this study were all students in SMA Negeri 5 Prabumulih. The sampling technique used in this study is the proportionate stratified random sampling technique which is part of the probability sampling technique. The data collection technique used is documentation and questionnaire. \nThe results of the study can be concluded; first, the majority of parents of students of SMAN 5 Prabumulih (68.5%) applied permissive parenting, the level of interaction was mostly (71.8%) of students with peers in the medium category, the level of mass media exposure was mostly (66.4% ) students in the medium category, the level of religiosity was mostly (69.8%) students in the moderate category, and the morals of most (77.2%) students were rated by PAI teachers in the quite good category; second, the results of the analysis of the coefficient of determination shows that the good and bad character of adolescents can be directly influenced by parenting, peers, mass media, and religiosity by 6.6%. But partially, from the four factors only religiosity has a positive and significant direct effect on adolescent morals. This means that the higher the religiosity of adolescents, the better the morals will be. The results of the path coefficient analysis indicate that the magnitude of the influence of religiosity is 23.9%, while peers is 10.3%, parenting is 3.7%, and mass media is only 2.8%; Third, the results of the analysis of the coefficient of determination show that the level of adolescent religiosity is only able to be directly affected by parenting, peers, and mass media by 1%. Although not significant, the results of a partial analysis show that the magnitude of the influence of parenting on religiosity is 9%, the influence of peers on religiosity is 3.1%, and the influence of mass media on religiosity is only 2.3%.","PeriodicalId":33187,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENGARUH RELEGIUSITAS TERHADAP AKHLAK REMAJA\",\"authors\":\"S. Suharman\",\"doi\":\"10.19109/pairf.v2i2.5507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research studies are motivated by researchers interest in the impact and influence of religiosity on adolescent morals. Due to the current declining adolescent morals, so the need for this study to see how much influence the religiosity of coaching and the formation of adolescent morals \\nThis study aims to determine whether there is an effect of regilisutas on adolescent morals. The type and approach of this study is research and quantitative approaches. The population used in this study were all students in SMA Negeri 5 Prabumulih. The sampling technique used in this study is the proportionate stratified random sampling technique which is part of the probability sampling technique. The data collection technique used is documentation and questionnaire. \\nThe results of the study can be concluded; first, the majority of parents of students of SMAN 5 Prabumulih (68.5%) applied permissive parenting, the level of interaction was mostly (71.8%) of students with peers in the medium category, the level of mass media exposure was mostly (66.4% ) students in the medium category, the level of religiosity was mostly (69.8%) students in the moderate category, and the morals of most (77.2%) students were rated by PAI teachers in the quite good category; second, the results of the analysis of the coefficient of determination shows that the good and bad character of adolescents can be directly influenced by parenting, peers, mass media, and religiosity by 6.6%. But partially, from the four factors only religiosity has a positive and significant direct effect on adolescent morals. This means that the higher the religiosity of adolescents, the better the morals will be. The results of the path coefficient analysis indicate that the magnitude of the influence of religiosity is 23.9%, while peers is 10.3%, parenting is 3.7%, and mass media is only 2.8%; Third, the results of the analysis of the coefficient of determination show that the level of adolescent religiosity is only able to be directly affected by parenting, peers, and mass media by 1%. Although not significant, the results of a partial analysis show that the magnitude of the influence of parenting on religiosity is 9%, the influence of peers on religiosity is 3.1%, and the influence of mass media on religiosity is only 2.3%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19109/pairf.v2i2.5507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19109/pairf.v2i2.5507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
研究的动机是研究人员对宗教信仰对青少年道德的影响和影响感兴趣。由于目前青少年道德的下降,因此本研究需要了解教练的宗教性对青少年道德的形成有多大的影响。本研究旨在确定regilisutas是否对青少年道德有影响。本研究的类型和方法是研究法和定量法。本研究使用的人群均为SMA Negeri 5 Prabumulih的学生。本研究使用的抽样技术是比例分层随机抽样技术,它是概率抽样技术的一部分。使用的数据收集技术是文档和问卷。可以得出研究结果;第一,ssman 5 Prabumulih学生的家长以宽容型教养为主(68.5%),与同伴的互动水平以中等类别学生为主(71.8%),大众媒体接触水平以中等类别学生为主(66.4%),宗教虔诚度以中等类别学生为主(69.8%),PAI教师对学生道德评价以较好类别学生为主(77.2%);第二,决定系数分析结果显示,父母教养、同伴、大众传媒、宗教信仰对青少年的好坏性格有6.6%的直接影响。但在部分方面,从四个因素来看,只有宗教信仰对青少年道德有积极而显著的直接影响。这意味着青少年的宗教虔诚度越高,其道德水平就越好。通径系数分析结果表明,宗教信仰的影响幅度为23.9%,而同伴的影响幅度为10.3%,父母的影响幅度为3.7%,大众传媒的影响幅度仅为2.8%;第三,决定系数分析结果显示,青少年宗教信仰水平仅能受到父母、同伴和大众传媒的1%的直接影响。虽然不显著,但局部分析的结果显示,父母对宗教信仰的影响幅度为9%,同伴对宗教信仰的影响幅度为3.1%,大众媒体对宗教信仰的影响幅度仅为2.3%。
Research studies are motivated by researchers interest in the impact and influence of religiosity on adolescent morals. Due to the current declining adolescent morals, so the need for this study to see how much influence the religiosity of coaching and the formation of adolescent morals
This study aims to determine whether there is an effect of regilisutas on adolescent morals. The type and approach of this study is research and quantitative approaches. The population used in this study were all students in SMA Negeri 5 Prabumulih. The sampling technique used in this study is the proportionate stratified random sampling technique which is part of the probability sampling technique. The data collection technique used is documentation and questionnaire.
The results of the study can be concluded; first, the majority of parents of students of SMAN 5 Prabumulih (68.5%) applied permissive parenting, the level of interaction was mostly (71.8%) of students with peers in the medium category, the level of mass media exposure was mostly (66.4% ) students in the medium category, the level of religiosity was mostly (69.8%) students in the moderate category, and the morals of most (77.2%) students were rated by PAI teachers in the quite good category; second, the results of the analysis of the coefficient of determination shows that the good and bad character of adolescents can be directly influenced by parenting, peers, mass media, and religiosity by 6.6%. But partially, from the four factors only religiosity has a positive and significant direct effect on adolescent morals. This means that the higher the religiosity of adolescents, the better the morals will be. The results of the path coefficient analysis indicate that the magnitude of the influence of religiosity is 23.9%, while peers is 10.3%, parenting is 3.7%, and mass media is only 2.8%; Third, the results of the analysis of the coefficient of determination show that the level of adolescent religiosity is only able to be directly affected by parenting, peers, and mass media by 1%. Although not significant, the results of a partial analysis show that the magnitude of the influence of parenting on religiosity is 9%, the influence of peers on religiosity is 3.1%, and the influence of mass media on religiosity is only 2.3%.