大城市第三波COVID-19大流行期间医护人员和成年人口的压力水平

Q3 Medicine Journal of Emergency Management Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.5055/jem.0762
Asad Khan, Anam Ali, Faisal Masood, Muhammad Arshad Khan, Sami Ullah Mumtaz, M. Masud, Ayesha Ijaz Sheikh, Sajid Abaid Ullah
{"title":"大城市第三波COVID-19大流行期间医护人员和成年人口的压力水平","authors":"Asad Khan, Anam Ali, Faisal Masood, Muhammad Arshad Khan, Sami Ullah Mumtaz, M. Masud, Ayesha Ijaz Sheikh, Sajid Abaid Ullah","doi":"10.5055/jem.0762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on public health has been widespread with clinically diverse manifestations ranging from asymptomatic presentation to critical illness. COVID-19 might influence different aspects of the stress process on the general population and healthcare workers (HCWs). \nObjectives: To examine the relationship of demographic variables with depression, anxiety, and stress and to compare stress levels in HCWs and the general population. \nMethod: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A sample of 1,063 participants was collected based on two groups. The first group comprised of HCWs who were directly looking after COVID-19 confirmed or suspected patients and working in any primary, secondary, or tertiary care hospitals. The second group comprised of participants working in public-dealing departments or businesses. Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) was administered to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. \nResult: Young people, females, and people having less work experience and without civil defense or disaster management training were more depressed, anxious, and stressed. Participants who had no access to scientific journals were more stressed. Average time spent on social media on COVID-19-related information, history of psychological illnesses, and use of sedatives after the COVID-19 pandemic positively predicted anxiety, depression, and stress. There was no significant difference in the scores of depression, anxiety, and stress for HCWs and the general population. \nConclusion: The anxiety levels were comparable among HCWs and adults, with vulnerable groups being female gender, young adults, and those who had a previous history of depression or substance abuse. Special consideration must be given to mental health, and protocols must be designed to provide psychological and emotional support to susceptible individuals.","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress levels among healthcare workers and adult population during the third wave of COVID-19 pandemic in a metropolitan city\",\"authors\":\"Asad Khan, Anam Ali, Faisal Masood, Muhammad Arshad Khan, Sami Ullah Mumtaz, M. Masud, Ayesha Ijaz Sheikh, Sajid Abaid Ullah\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/jem.0762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on public health has been widespread with clinically diverse manifestations ranging from asymptomatic presentation to critical illness. COVID-19 might influence different aspects of the stress process on the general population and healthcare workers (HCWs). \\nObjectives: To examine the relationship of demographic variables with depression, anxiety, and stress and to compare stress levels in HCWs and the general population. \\nMethod: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A sample of 1,063 participants was collected based on two groups. The first group comprised of HCWs who were directly looking after COVID-19 confirmed or suspected patients and working in any primary, secondary, or tertiary care hospitals. The second group comprised of participants working in public-dealing departments or businesses. Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) was administered to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. \\nResult: Young people, females, and people having less work experience and without civil defense or disaster management training were more depressed, anxious, and stressed. Participants who had no access to scientific journals were more stressed. Average time spent on social media on COVID-19-related information, history of psychological illnesses, and use of sedatives after the COVID-19 pandemic positively predicted anxiety, depression, and stress. There was no significant difference in the scores of depression, anxiety, and stress for HCWs and the general population. \\nConclusion: The anxiety levels were comparable among HCWs and adults, with vulnerable groups being female gender, young adults, and those who had a previous history of depression or substance abuse. Special consideration must be given to mental health, and protocols must be designed to provide psychological and emotional support to susceptible individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对公共卫生的影响广泛存在,临床表现多样,从无症状到危重症不等。COVID-19可能会影响一般人群和医护人员(HCWs)压力过程的不同方面。目的:研究人口统计学变量与抑郁、焦虑和压力的关系,并比较卫生保健工作者和一般人群的压力水平。方法:采用横断面研究。1063名参与者被分为两组。第一组由直接照顾COVID-19确诊或疑似患者并在任何一级、二级或三级保健医院工作的医护人员组成。第二组由在公共事务部门或企业工作的参与者组成。抑郁焦虑压力量表-42 (DASS-42)用于评估抑郁、焦虑和压力。结果:年轻人、女性、工作经验较少、未接受过民防和灾害管理培训的人群抑郁、焦虑和压力更大。没有接触到科学期刊的参与者压力更大。社交媒体上与COVID-19相关信息的平均时间、心理疾病史以及COVID-19大流行后镇静剂的使用对焦虑、抑郁和压力有积极的预测作用。卫生保健工作者和一般人群在抑郁、焦虑和压力方面的得分没有显著差异。结论:健康护理人员的焦虑水平与成人具有可比性,弱势群体为女性、年轻人、既往有抑郁或药物滥用史者。必须特别考虑到心理健康,必须制定方案,向易受影响的个人提供心理和情感支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stress levels among healthcare workers and adult population during the third wave of COVID-19 pandemic in a metropolitan city
Introduction: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on public health has been widespread with clinically diverse manifestations ranging from asymptomatic presentation to critical illness. COVID-19 might influence different aspects of the stress process on the general population and healthcare workers (HCWs). Objectives: To examine the relationship of demographic variables with depression, anxiety, and stress and to compare stress levels in HCWs and the general population. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A sample of 1,063 participants was collected based on two groups. The first group comprised of HCWs who were directly looking after COVID-19 confirmed or suspected patients and working in any primary, secondary, or tertiary care hospitals. The second group comprised of participants working in public-dealing departments or businesses. Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) was administered to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. Result: Young people, females, and people having less work experience and without civil defense or disaster management training were more depressed, anxious, and stressed. Participants who had no access to scientific journals were more stressed. Average time spent on social media on COVID-19-related information, history of psychological illnesses, and use of sedatives after the COVID-19 pandemic positively predicted anxiety, depression, and stress. There was no significant difference in the scores of depression, anxiety, and stress for HCWs and the general population. Conclusion: The anxiety levels were comparable among HCWs and adults, with vulnerable groups being female gender, young adults, and those who had a previous history of depression or substance abuse. Special consideration must be given to mental health, and protocols must be designed to provide psychological and emotional support to susceptible individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
United front: Emergency management managers, public health, and infection prevention. What's next for the disaster profession? A study of the opinions of local and state emergency managers and their recommendations for a more resilient future. A case study of university mass casualty simulation with high school deaf students who sign. A qualitative analysis of the effects of the COVID-19 response on low-income residents in Cameron County, Texas: Lessons for future pandemic response. Beirut 2020 explosion and health system response: An alarm for the dangerous consequences of Natech incidents in industrial cities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1