儿科患者的无创基因组图谱

Allyson Perry, D. Ruppenthal, Kellie Hill
{"title":"儿科患者的无创基因组图谱","authors":"Allyson Perry, D. Ruppenthal, Kellie Hill","doi":"10.25251/skin.7.supp.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Pigmented lesions with clinical features suspicious for melanoma are not uncommon in pediatric patients. Evaluation of these lesions is complicated by the low prevalence of pediatric melanoma and challenges associated with performing biopsies in children. The DermTech Melanoma Test (‘the test’) is a non-invasive genomic test designed to rule out melanoma. It consists of the Pigmented Lesion Assay (PLA), which detects RNA gene expression of long intergenic non-coding RNA 00518 (LINC00518, or LINC) and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), and an add-on assay for DNA promoter mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), which is performed if ordered and if sufficient genomic material is available. Patients younger than 18 years were not included in initial validation studies. In this analysis, we sought to compare genomic biomarker results between uncertain pigmented lesions from adult and pediatric patients. \nMethods:De-identified samples submitted to the clinical lab for the test from May through October 2022 were used for this analysis. Genomic results were available for 36,377 samples. The anatomic locations of the lesions were categorized as head/neck, trunk, or extremities and compared between adult and pediatric patients. Positivity rates for the PLA (and each individual marker) and the TERT add-on assay were calculated for adults and patients younger than 18 years of age. \nResults:The PLA was performed on 34,050 skin samples from adults and 2,327 samples from pediatric patients. There were no differences between adults and pediatric patients in anatomic location of the lesions tested. The proportion of PLA-positive samples was similar between adult (7.0%, n=2,393) and pediatric (8.0%, n=187) patients. Rates of biomarkers detected among PLA-positive adult and pediatric patient samples, respectively, were as follows: LINC only (31.4% vs 69.5%), PRAME only (45.5% vs 14.4%), LINC and PRAME (23.0% vs 16.0%). The TERT add-on assay was performed in 11,084 samples from adults and 613 samples from pediatric patients. Of these, TERT was positive in 830 (7.5%) adult and 3 (0.5%) pediatric patient samples. \nConclusions:This analysis provides new information about genomic profiling of uncertain pigmented lesions from pediatric patients. While overall PLA positivity rates were similar across adult and pediatric samples, the proportion positive only for LINC was more than two times higher in pediatric samples. Additionally, TERT promoter mutations were rarely detected in pediatric samples. Further investigation of the significance of LINC, PRAME, and TERT abnormalities in lesions from pediatric patients is ongoing.","PeriodicalId":74803,"journal":{"name":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Invasive Genomic Profiling in Pediatric Patients\",\"authors\":\"Allyson Perry, D. Ruppenthal, Kellie Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.25251/skin.7.supp.198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Pigmented lesions with clinical features suspicious for melanoma are not uncommon in pediatric patients. Evaluation of these lesions is complicated by the low prevalence of pediatric melanoma and challenges associated with performing biopsies in children. The DermTech Melanoma Test (‘the test’) is a non-invasive genomic test designed to rule out melanoma. It consists of the Pigmented Lesion Assay (PLA), which detects RNA gene expression of long intergenic non-coding RNA 00518 (LINC00518, or LINC) and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), and an add-on assay for DNA promoter mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), which is performed if ordered and if sufficient genomic material is available. Patients younger than 18 years were not included in initial validation studies. In this analysis, we sought to compare genomic biomarker results between uncertain pigmented lesions from adult and pediatric patients. \\nMethods:De-identified samples submitted to the clinical lab for the test from May through October 2022 were used for this analysis. Genomic results were available for 36,377 samples. The anatomic locations of the lesions were categorized as head/neck, trunk, or extremities and compared between adult and pediatric patients. Positivity rates for the PLA (and each individual marker) and the TERT add-on assay were calculated for adults and patients younger than 18 years of age. \\nResults:The PLA was performed on 34,050 skin samples from adults and 2,327 samples from pediatric patients. There were no differences between adults and pediatric patients in anatomic location of the lesions tested. The proportion of PLA-positive samples was similar between adult (7.0%, n=2,393) and pediatric (8.0%, n=187) patients. Rates of biomarkers detected among PLA-positive adult and pediatric patient samples, respectively, were as follows: LINC only (31.4% vs 69.5%), PRAME only (45.5% vs 14.4%), LINC and PRAME (23.0% vs 16.0%). The TERT add-on assay was performed in 11,084 samples from adults and 613 samples from pediatric patients. Of these, TERT was positive in 830 (7.5%) adult and 3 (0.5%) pediatric patient samples. \\nConclusions:This analysis provides new information about genomic profiling of uncertain pigmented lesions from pediatric patients. While overall PLA positivity rates were similar across adult and pediatric samples, the proportion positive only for LINC was more than two times higher in pediatric samples. Additionally, TERT promoter mutations were rarely detected in pediatric samples. Further investigation of the significance of LINC, PRAME, and TERT abnormalities in lesions from pediatric patients is ongoing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.supp.198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.supp.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床特征可疑为黑色素瘤的色素沉着病变在儿科患者中并不罕见。儿童黑色素瘤的低发病率以及与儿童活检相关的挑战使这些病变的评估变得复杂。DermTech黑色素瘤测试(“测试”)是一种非侵入性基因组测试,旨在排除黑色素瘤。它包括色素病变测定(PLA),检测黑色素瘤中长基因间非编码RNA 00518(LINC00518或LINC)和优先表达抗原(PRAME)的RNA基因表达,以及端粒酶逆转录酶(TERT)中DNA启动子突变的附加测定,如果有足够的基因组材料,则进行该测定。年龄小于18岁的患者未纳入初始验证研究。在这项分析中,我们试图比较成人和儿童患者不确定色素沉着病变的基因组生物标志物结果。方法:使用2022年5月至10月提交给临床实验室进行检测的未鉴定样本进行分析。36377个样本的基因组结果可用。病变的解剖位置分为头/颈、躯干或四肢,并在成人和儿童患者之间进行比较。计算成人和18岁以下患者的PLA(以及每个个体标志物)和TERT附加测定的阳性率。结果:对34050份成人皮肤样本和2327份儿童患者皮肤样本进行了PLA。成人和儿童患者在测试病变的解剖位置上没有差异。成人(7.0%,n=2393)和儿童(8.0%,n=187)患者的PLA阳性样本比例相似。在PLA阳性的成人和儿童患者样本中检测到的生物标志物的比率分别如下:仅LINC(31.4%vs 69.5%),仅PRAME(45.5%vs 14.4%),LINC和PRAME,23.0%vs 16.0%。其中,830例(7.5%)成人和3例(0.5%)儿童患者样本中TERT呈阳性。结论:该分析为儿科患者不确定色素病变的基因组图谱提供了新的信息。虽然成人和儿童样本的总体PLA阳性率相似,但儿童样本中仅LINC阳性的比例高出两倍多。此外,在儿科样本中很少检测到TERT启动子突变。对儿童患者病变中LINC、PRAME和TERT异常的意义的进一步研究正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-Invasive Genomic Profiling in Pediatric Patients
Background:Pigmented lesions with clinical features suspicious for melanoma are not uncommon in pediatric patients. Evaluation of these lesions is complicated by the low prevalence of pediatric melanoma and challenges associated with performing biopsies in children. The DermTech Melanoma Test (‘the test’) is a non-invasive genomic test designed to rule out melanoma. It consists of the Pigmented Lesion Assay (PLA), which detects RNA gene expression of long intergenic non-coding RNA 00518 (LINC00518, or LINC) and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), and an add-on assay for DNA promoter mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), which is performed if ordered and if sufficient genomic material is available. Patients younger than 18 years were not included in initial validation studies. In this analysis, we sought to compare genomic biomarker results between uncertain pigmented lesions from adult and pediatric patients. Methods:De-identified samples submitted to the clinical lab for the test from May through October 2022 were used for this analysis. Genomic results were available for 36,377 samples. The anatomic locations of the lesions were categorized as head/neck, trunk, or extremities and compared between adult and pediatric patients. Positivity rates for the PLA (and each individual marker) and the TERT add-on assay were calculated for adults and patients younger than 18 years of age. Results:The PLA was performed on 34,050 skin samples from adults and 2,327 samples from pediatric patients. There were no differences between adults and pediatric patients in anatomic location of the lesions tested. The proportion of PLA-positive samples was similar between adult (7.0%, n=2,393) and pediatric (8.0%, n=187) patients. Rates of biomarkers detected among PLA-positive adult and pediatric patient samples, respectively, were as follows: LINC only (31.4% vs 69.5%), PRAME only (45.5% vs 14.4%), LINC and PRAME (23.0% vs 16.0%). The TERT add-on assay was performed in 11,084 samples from adults and 613 samples from pediatric patients. Of these, TERT was positive in 830 (7.5%) adult and 3 (0.5%) pediatric patient samples. Conclusions:This analysis provides new information about genomic profiling of uncertain pigmented lesions from pediatric patients. While overall PLA positivity rates were similar across adult and pediatric samples, the proportion positive only for LINC was more than two times higher in pediatric samples. Additionally, TERT promoter mutations were rarely detected in pediatric samples. Further investigation of the significance of LINC, PRAME, and TERT abnormalities in lesions from pediatric patients is ongoing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Age or Sex on Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%/Adapalene 0.15% Gel in Participants with Moderate-to-Severe Acne Cryoglobulinemia Type I in Patient with History of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Unknown Significance: A Case Report A Suspected Case of Imported Yaws in New York Syphilis in HIV Positive Individuals and the Importance of a Skin Exam: A Case Report Beware of the “Blue Nevus”: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1