{"title":"利用SCOPUS数据库对甲真菌病高引用100种出版物的文献计量分析(1972–2022)","authors":"Samantha Jo Albucker, Shari R Lipner","doi":"10.1159/000531184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Onychomycosis represents half of nail disorders seen in clinical practice. Despite its high prevalence, a bibliometric analysis has not been performed. We aimed to identify the top 100 highly cited onychomycosis publications over the last 50 years to better understand research trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SCOPUS was searched for onychomycosis publications, using \"onychomycosis\" and \"nail fungus\" 1/1/1972-12/31/22 on 3/25/23. Top 100 highly cited publications were recorded and ranked by total citation count.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total citation count was 13,456, with the top 10 articles with highest citation count/year having average 28.7 citations/year. Most articles were published in high IF journals. From 1982 to 2011 (no treatment articles - 1972-1981), there was an 8.6% increase in articles discussing treatment. Overall, 42% of first authors were female.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found an overall increase in articles discussing onychomycosis therapies over time, with the majority published in high IF journals. We also found a relatively greater percentage of female first authors compared to studies on other dermatologic topics. While total citation count remains a widely used metric of impact in bibliometric studies, average citation count/year may be a better measure of impact and should be considered in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21844,"journal":{"name":"Skin Appendage Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Highly Cited Onychomycosis Publications Using SCOPUS Database (1972-2022).\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Jo Albucker, Shari R Lipner\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000531184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Onychomycosis represents half of nail disorders seen in clinical practice. Despite its high prevalence, a bibliometric analysis has not been performed. We aimed to identify the top 100 highly cited onychomycosis publications over the last 50 years to better understand research trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SCOPUS was searched for onychomycosis publications, using \\\"onychomycosis\\\" and \\\"nail fungus\\\" 1/1/1972-12/31/22 on 3/25/23. Top 100 highly cited publications were recorded and ranked by total citation count.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total citation count was 13,456, with the top 10 articles with highest citation count/year having average 28.7 citations/year. Most articles were published in high IF journals. From 1982 to 2011 (no treatment articles - 1972-1981), there was an 8.6% increase in articles discussing treatment. Overall, 42% of first authors were female.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found an overall increase in articles discussing onychomycosis therapies over time, with the majority published in high IF journals. We also found a relatively greater percentage of female first authors compared to studies on other dermatologic topics. While total citation count remains a widely used metric of impact in bibliometric studies, average citation count/year may be a better measure of impact and should be considered in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin Appendage Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin Appendage Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Appendage Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Highly Cited Onychomycosis Publications Using SCOPUS Database (1972-2022).
Introduction: Onychomycosis represents half of nail disorders seen in clinical practice. Despite its high prevalence, a bibliometric analysis has not been performed. We aimed to identify the top 100 highly cited onychomycosis publications over the last 50 years to better understand research trends.
Methods: SCOPUS was searched for onychomycosis publications, using "onychomycosis" and "nail fungus" 1/1/1972-12/31/22 on 3/25/23. Top 100 highly cited publications were recorded and ranked by total citation count.
Results: Total citation count was 13,456, with the top 10 articles with highest citation count/year having average 28.7 citations/year. Most articles were published in high IF journals. From 1982 to 2011 (no treatment articles - 1972-1981), there was an 8.6% increase in articles discussing treatment. Overall, 42% of first authors were female.
Conclusion: We found an overall increase in articles discussing onychomycosis therapies over time, with the majority published in high IF journals. We also found a relatively greater percentage of female first authors compared to studies on other dermatologic topics. While total citation count remains a widely used metric of impact in bibliometric studies, average citation count/year may be a better measure of impact and should be considered in future studies.