敌人和受害者:波兰的流浪狗,1945–70(话语与行动)

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.12775/aph.2019.120.05
D. Jarosz
{"title":"敌人和受害者:波兰的流浪狗,1945–70(话语与行动)","authors":"D. Jarosz","doi":"10.12775/aph.2019.120.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues that two primary roles were prevalently identified for dogs in the period concerned: for one thing, dogs were perceived as objects of human malevolence or at least dislike; this had to do with the dissemination of disease – particularly, rabies, dangerous to humans. For another, the dog was represented as a victim of cruelty. The exchange of arguments between adherents of different solutions to the ‘canine question’ (dog-pounds and culling vs. shelters) grew emotion-imbued, especially in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The press published voices of protest against mass killings of dogs and reinstatement of dogcatcher’s establishments. Eminent scientists, artists, cultural workers sent requests or appeals in these respects to the authorities. This ‘canine campaign’ led to the adoption, in 1961–2, of legal acts designed to make the methods of dealing with homeless animals ‘civilised’, but they did not bring about a breakthrough in the way dogs were treated or dealt with in post-war Poland. The campaign demonstrated that an active group of dog lovers got formed in the People’s Republic. In this sense, it can be said that dogs became an object of human care (the latter topic not having been subject to the research on which the following text is based).","PeriodicalId":42490,"journal":{"name":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","volume":"120 1","pages":"113-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Enemy and the Victim: Stray Dogs in Poland, 1945–70 (Discourses and Actions)\",\"authors\":\"D. Jarosz\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/aph.2019.120.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article argues that two primary roles were prevalently identified for dogs in the period concerned: for one thing, dogs were perceived as objects of human malevolence or at least dislike; this had to do with the dissemination of disease – particularly, rabies, dangerous to humans. For another, the dog was represented as a victim of cruelty. The exchange of arguments between adherents of different solutions to the ‘canine question’ (dog-pounds and culling vs. shelters) grew emotion-imbued, especially in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The press published voices of protest against mass killings of dogs and reinstatement of dogcatcher’s establishments. Eminent scientists, artists, cultural workers sent requests or appeals in these respects to the authorities. This ‘canine campaign’ led to the adoption, in 1961–2, of legal acts designed to make the methods of dealing with homeless animals ‘civilised’, but they did not bring about a breakthrough in the way dogs were treated or dealt with in post-war Poland. The campaign demonstrated that an active group of dog lovers got formed in the People’s Republic. In this sense, it can be said that dogs became an object of human care (the latter topic not having been subject to the research on which the following text is based).\",\"PeriodicalId\":42490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"113-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/aph.2019.120.05\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/aph.2019.120.05","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章认为,在这一时期,狗普遍扮演两个主要角色:一方面,狗被视为人类恶意或至少不喜欢的对象;这与疾病的传播有关,尤其是对人类有危险的狂犬病。另一方面,这只狗被描述为残忍的受害者。“狗问题”(狗磅和扑杀与收容所)不同解决方案的追随者之间的争论越来越激烈,尤其是在20世纪50年代末和60年代初。媒体发表了抗议大规模屠杀狗和恢复捕狗机构的声音。知名科学家、艺术家、文化工作者向当局发出了这些方面的请求或呼吁。这场“犬只运动”导致1961–2年通过了旨在使处理流浪动物的方法“文明化”的法律法案,但这些法案并没有在战后波兰对待或处理犬只的方式上取得突破。这场运动表明,在中华人民共和国形成了一个积极的爱狗群体。从这个意义上说,可以说狗成为了人类照顾的对象(后一个主题没有受到以下文本所基于的研究的影响)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Enemy and the Victim: Stray Dogs in Poland, 1945–70 (Discourses and Actions)
The article argues that two primary roles were prevalently identified for dogs in the period concerned: for one thing, dogs were perceived as objects of human malevolence or at least dislike; this had to do with the dissemination of disease – particularly, rabies, dangerous to humans. For another, the dog was represented as a victim of cruelty. The exchange of arguments between adherents of different solutions to the ‘canine question’ (dog-pounds and culling vs. shelters) grew emotion-imbued, especially in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The press published voices of protest against mass killings of dogs and reinstatement of dogcatcher’s establishments. Eminent scientists, artists, cultural workers sent requests or appeals in these respects to the authorities. This ‘canine campaign’ led to the adoption, in 1961–2, of legal acts designed to make the methods of dealing with homeless animals ‘civilised’, but they did not bring about a breakthrough in the way dogs were treated or dealt with in post-war Poland. The campaign demonstrated that an active group of dog lovers got formed in the People’s Republic. In this sense, it can be said that dogs became an object of human care (the latter topic not having been subject to the research on which the following text is based).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Półrocznik redagowany przez zespół pracowników naukowych Instytutu Historii PAN (do tomu 99 red. Maria Bogucka, od tomu 100 red. Halina Manikowska). Ceny numerów archiwalnych aktualizowane są na bieżąco.
期刊最新文献
Heritage Without Heirs: The German Legacy in Serbia. The Case of the Museum of Danube Swabians The Polish Catholic Church and the Public Memory of the Shoah: Between Mnemonic Backlash and Settling Accounts with the Past Jewish Autobiographical Writing. Memoirs of Moses Vasertsug (c. 1760–1832) Third War of Independence? The Anti-Colonial Dynamics of Ukraine’s Politics of Memory after 2014 on the Example of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War in Kyiv Peripheral (Non)Polishnesses. Museums, Creeping Conflicts, and Transformative Frictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1