以效果为导向的分析及其后:如何发现因果环境毒物

Exposome Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1093/exposome/osad002
Z. Tian, Madison H McMinn, Mingliang Fang
{"title":"以效果为导向的分析及其后:如何发现因果环境毒物","authors":"Z. Tian, Madison H McMinn, Mingliang Fang","doi":"10.1093/exposome/osad002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Humans and wildlife are exposed to complex environmental mixtures. Identifying causal toxic pollutants in environmental samples remains challenging because of the high complexity of sample mixtures and the unknown nature of the potential toxicants. In the field of environmental chemistry and toxicology, this pursuit of causal toxicants leads us to the method of effect-directed analysis (EDA), an integrated method comprised of three iterative modules: (1) bioassays to guide component prioritization; (2) fractionation to reduce the mixture complexity; and (3) chemical analysis to identify the toxicants. In this commentary review, we try to provide a concise guideline for EDA beginners by summarizing good practices from successful EDA studies, categorized by sample-toxicity pair selection, efficient separation, and chemical analysis. We also discussed the practical challenges faced with current EDA practices. Based on these above, we try to provide suggestions and perspectives for future EDA studies. Specifically, we discussed the potential of applying EDA on human biological examples to identify the environmental causes of human diseases. We proposed future collaboration between environmental chemists and toxicologists, environmental health scientists, epidemiologists, physicians, and social scientists.","PeriodicalId":73005,"journal":{"name":"Exposome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect-directed analysis and beyond: how to find causal environmental toxicants\",\"authors\":\"Z. Tian, Madison H McMinn, Mingliang Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/exposome/osad002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Humans and wildlife are exposed to complex environmental mixtures. Identifying causal toxic pollutants in environmental samples remains challenging because of the high complexity of sample mixtures and the unknown nature of the potential toxicants. In the field of environmental chemistry and toxicology, this pursuit of causal toxicants leads us to the method of effect-directed analysis (EDA), an integrated method comprised of three iterative modules: (1) bioassays to guide component prioritization; (2) fractionation to reduce the mixture complexity; and (3) chemical analysis to identify the toxicants. In this commentary review, we try to provide a concise guideline for EDA beginners by summarizing good practices from successful EDA studies, categorized by sample-toxicity pair selection, efficient separation, and chemical analysis. We also discussed the practical challenges faced with current EDA practices. Based on these above, we try to provide suggestions and perspectives for future EDA studies. Specifically, we discussed the potential of applying EDA on human biological examples to identify the environmental causes of human diseases. We proposed future collaboration between environmental chemists and toxicologists, environmental health scientists, epidemiologists, physicians, and social scientists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exposome\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exposome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/exposome/osad002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exposome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/exposome/osad002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类和野生动物暴露在复杂的环境混合物中。由于样品混合物的高度复杂性和潜在有毒物质的未知性质,识别环境样品中的因果有毒污染物仍然具有挑战性。在环境化学和毒理学领域,对因果毒物的追求使我们转向了效应导向分析(EDA)方法,这是一种由三个迭代模块组成的集成方法:(1)生物测定,以指导成分的优先顺序;(2) 分馏以降低混合物的复杂性;以及(3)化学分析以鉴定毒物。在这篇评论综述中,我们试图通过总结成功的EDA研究的良好实践,为EDA初学者提供一个简明的指南,按样品毒性对选择、有效分离和化学分析进行分类。我们还讨论了当前EDA实践面临的实际挑战。在此基础上,我们试图为未来EDA研究提供建议和展望。具体而言,我们讨论了将EDA应用于人类生物学实例以确定人类疾病的环境原因的潜力。我们建议未来环境化学家和毒理学家、环境健康科学家、流行病学家、医生和社会科学家之间的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect-directed analysis and beyond: how to find causal environmental toxicants
Humans and wildlife are exposed to complex environmental mixtures. Identifying causal toxic pollutants in environmental samples remains challenging because of the high complexity of sample mixtures and the unknown nature of the potential toxicants. In the field of environmental chemistry and toxicology, this pursuit of causal toxicants leads us to the method of effect-directed analysis (EDA), an integrated method comprised of three iterative modules: (1) bioassays to guide component prioritization; (2) fractionation to reduce the mixture complexity; and (3) chemical analysis to identify the toxicants. In this commentary review, we try to provide a concise guideline for EDA beginners by summarizing good practices from successful EDA studies, categorized by sample-toxicity pair selection, efficient separation, and chemical analysis. We also discussed the practical challenges faced with current EDA practices. Based on these above, we try to provide suggestions and perspectives for future EDA studies. Specifically, we discussed the potential of applying EDA on human biological examples to identify the environmental causes of human diseases. We proposed future collaboration between environmental chemists and toxicologists, environmental health scientists, epidemiologists, physicians, and social scientists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exposomics: perfection not required. A long and winding road: Culture change on data sharing in exposomics Interactive data sharing for multiple questionnaire-based exposome-wide association studies and exposome correlations in the Personalized Environment and Genes Study. Questionnaire-based exposome-wide association studies for common diseases in the Personalized Environment and Genes Study. Decoding the exposome: Data science methodologies and implications in Exposome-Wide association studies (ExWASs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1