{"title":"法律决策中的启发式","authors":"Thomas Hoffmann","doi":"10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of algorithm-based decisions, generated in the “black boxes” of deep learning ensembles and their controversially discussed ethical and legal implications, the fact that human legal decision-making is to a large degree not based on rational choices, and thus also neither deducible nor predictable, tends to be neglected in legal discussion. this article intends to provide an overview on heuristic patterns in human legal decision-making by pointing out their flaws and benefits, and also provides some advice on how to hedge its risks in legal practice.","PeriodicalId":37693,"journal":{"name":"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum","volume":"8 1","pages":"62-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heuristics in Legal Decision-Making\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advent of algorithm-based decisions, generated in the “black boxes” of deep learning ensembles and their controversially discussed ethical and legal implications, the fact that human legal decision-making is to a large degree not based on rational choices, and thus also neither deducible nor predictable, tends to be neglected in legal discussion. this article intends to provide an overview on heuristic patterns in human legal decision-making by pointing out their flaws and benefits, and also provides some advice on how to hedge its risks in legal practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"62-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
With the advent of algorithm-based decisions, generated in the “black boxes” of deep learning ensembles and their controversially discussed ethical and legal implications, the fact that human legal decision-making is to a large degree not based on rational choices, and thus also neither deducible nor predictable, tends to be neglected in legal discussion. this article intends to provide an overview on heuristic patterns in human legal decision-making by pointing out their flaws and benefits, and also provides some advice on how to hedge its risks in legal practice.
期刊介绍：
Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum sees its mission in offering publishing opportunities for Baltic and non-Baltic scholars in the field of the history and philosophy of natural and social sciences (including legal studies) to promote and further international cooperation between scholars of different countries in this field.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
