分数教学能提高教师对分数的理解吗?

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Elementary School Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1086/713975
L. Fuchs, Amelia S. Malone
{"title":"分数教学能提高教师对分数的理解吗?","authors":"L. Fuchs, Amelia S. Malone","doi":"10.1086/713975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this causal-comparative study was to gain insight into whether teaching fractions improves teachers’ understanding of fractions. University master’s students (n = 25) conducted tutoring on fraction magnitude in grades 3–5. The contrast condition, 17 master’s students drawn from the same pool of research assistant applicants, conducted tutoring to improve science and social studies text comprehension in grades 3–5. In the fractions condition, students were at risk for mathematics difficulty; in the text comprehension condition, at risk for reading difficulty. When tutoring ended, tutors’ accuracy of number line placement of single fractions and fraction sums as well as single whole numbers and whole number sums was assessed. Results indicated superior accuracy for fraction tutors over text comprehension tutors on fraction sums, with an effect size of 0.75. The effect size for placement of single fractions was 0.47. Implications are extrapolated to preservice and in-service teachers.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"121 1","pages":"656 - 673"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713975","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Teaching Fractions Improve Teachers’ Fraction Understanding?\",\"authors\":\"L. Fuchs, Amelia S. Malone\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/713975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this causal-comparative study was to gain insight into whether teaching fractions improves teachers’ understanding of fractions. University master’s students (n = 25) conducted tutoring on fraction magnitude in grades 3–5. The contrast condition, 17 master’s students drawn from the same pool of research assistant applicants, conducted tutoring to improve science and social studies text comprehension in grades 3–5. In the fractions condition, students were at risk for mathematics difficulty; in the text comprehension condition, at risk for reading difficulty. When tutoring ended, tutors’ accuracy of number line placement of single fractions and fraction sums as well as single whole numbers and whole number sums was assessed. Results indicated superior accuracy for fraction tutors over text comprehension tutors on fraction sums, with an effect size of 0.75. The effect size for placement of single fractions was 0.47. Implications are extrapolated to preservice and in-service teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"656 - 673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713975\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/713975\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/713975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本因果比较研究的目的是了解教学分数是否能提高教师对分数的理解。大学硕士生(n = 25)在3-5年级进行分数量级辅导。在对比条件下,从相同的研究助理申请者中选出17名硕士研究生,对3-5年级的科学和社会研究文本理解能力进行辅导。分数组学生存在数学困难的风险;在文本理解条件下,有阅读困难的风险。辅导结束后,评估导师对单分数和分数和、单整数和整数和数轴放置的准确性。结果显示分数导师对分数和的准确性优于文本理解导师,效应量为0.75。单个分数放置的效应量为0.47。影响外推到职前和在职教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Teaching Fractions Improve Teachers’ Fraction Understanding?
The purpose of this causal-comparative study was to gain insight into whether teaching fractions improves teachers’ understanding of fractions. University master’s students (n = 25) conducted tutoring on fraction magnitude in grades 3–5. The contrast condition, 17 master’s students drawn from the same pool of research assistant applicants, conducted tutoring to improve science and social studies text comprehension in grades 3–5. In the fractions condition, students were at risk for mathematics difficulty; in the text comprehension condition, at risk for reading difficulty. When tutoring ended, tutors’ accuracy of number line placement of single fractions and fraction sums as well as single whole numbers and whole number sums was assessed. Results indicated superior accuracy for fraction tutors over text comprehension tutors on fraction sums, with an effect size of 0.75. The effect size for placement of single fractions was 0.47. Implications are extrapolated to preservice and in-service teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Elementary School Journal
Elementary School Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and optimization of sequence-based gene regulatory deep learning models. “It’s Just Something That You Have to Do as a Teacher” Front Matter 41 Teachers, 41 Different Ways Predictable Variation in the Implementation of a Curricular Intervention—and Why it Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1