工程中的“谁”:社会技术工程作为难忘和相关的

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI:10.3991/ijep.v13i5.36571
Diana A. Chen, Marissa H. Forbes, G. Hoople, S. Lord, J. Mejia
{"title":"工程中的“谁”:社会技术工程作为难忘和相关的","authors":"Diana A. Chen, Marissa H. Forbes, G. Hoople, S. Lord, J. Mejia","doi":"10.3991/ijep.v13i5.36571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does emphasizing the role of people in engineering influence the memorability of engineering content? This study is part of a larger project through which our team developed a new undergraduate energy course to better reflect students’ cultures and lived experiences through asset-based pedagogies to help students develop a sociotechnical mindset in engineering problem solving. In this study, students in the class were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews (n=5) to explore our effectiveness in helping them develop a sociotechnical mindset around energy issues and conceptualize engineering as a sociotechnical endeavor. This study focuses on an activity during the interview where the participants were asked to sort a variety of images associated with class learning experiences along a spectrum of least to most memorable. Emergent themes from students’ responses revolved around learning experiences that included global perspectives and emphasized a “who” (i.e., whose problems, who is impacted by engineering, and what type of engineers the students will choose to become) as the most memorable. Our results indicate that students found the sociotechnical aspects of the course more memorable than the traditional canonical engineering content. These findings suggest that framing engineering content as sociotechnical can be one strategy to increase student engagement, increase memorability of lessons, and help students to think more deeply about their own goals as future engineers.","PeriodicalId":45481,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “Who” in Engineering: Sociotechnical Engineering as Memorable and Relevant\",\"authors\":\"Diana A. Chen, Marissa H. Forbes, G. Hoople, S. Lord, J. Mejia\",\"doi\":\"10.3991/ijep.v13i5.36571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Does emphasizing the role of people in engineering influence the memorability of engineering content? This study is part of a larger project through which our team developed a new undergraduate energy course to better reflect students’ cultures and lived experiences through asset-based pedagogies to help students develop a sociotechnical mindset in engineering problem solving. In this study, students in the class were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews (n=5) to explore our effectiveness in helping them develop a sociotechnical mindset around energy issues and conceptualize engineering as a sociotechnical endeavor. This study focuses on an activity during the interview where the participants were asked to sort a variety of images associated with class learning experiences along a spectrum of least to most memorable. Emergent themes from students’ responses revolved around learning experiences that included global perspectives and emphasized a “who” (i.e., whose problems, who is impacted by engineering, and what type of engineers the students will choose to become) as the most memorable. Our results indicate that students found the sociotechnical aspects of the course more memorable than the traditional canonical engineering content. These findings suggest that framing engineering content as sociotechnical can be one strategy to increase student engagement, increase memorability of lessons, and help students to think more deeply about their own goals as future engineers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i5.36571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i5.36571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强调人在工程中的作用会影响工程内容的可记忆性吗?这项研究是一个更大项目的一部分,通过该项目,我们的团队开发了一门新的本科生能源课程,通过基于资产的教学法更好地反映学生的文化和生活经历,帮助学生在解决工程问题时培养社会技术心态。在这项研究中,班上的学生被邀请参加半结构化访谈(n=5),以探索我们在帮助他们围绕能源问题培养社会技术心态方面的有效性,并将工程概念化为社会技术努力。这项研究的重点是采访期间的一项活动,参与者被要求对与课堂学习经历相关的各种图像进行排序,从最不难忘到最难忘。学生回答中出现的主题围绕着学习经历展开,其中包括全球视角,并强调“谁”(即谁的问题,谁受到工程的影响,以及学生将选择成为什么类型的工程师)是最令人难忘的。我们的研究结果表明,学生们发现该课程的社会技术方面比传统的规范工程内容更令人难忘。这些发现表明,将工程内容定义为社会技术内容可以成为提高学生参与度、增加课程记忆性并帮助学生更深入地思考自己作为未来工程师的目标的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The “Who” in Engineering: Sociotechnical Engineering as Memorable and Relevant
Does emphasizing the role of people in engineering influence the memorability of engineering content? This study is part of a larger project through which our team developed a new undergraduate energy course to better reflect students’ cultures and lived experiences through asset-based pedagogies to help students develop a sociotechnical mindset in engineering problem solving. In this study, students in the class were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews (n=5) to explore our effectiveness in helping them develop a sociotechnical mindset around energy issues and conceptualize engineering as a sociotechnical endeavor. This study focuses on an activity during the interview where the participants were asked to sort a variety of images associated with class learning experiences along a spectrum of least to most memorable. Emergent themes from students’ responses revolved around learning experiences that included global perspectives and emphasized a “who” (i.e., whose problems, who is impacted by engineering, and what type of engineers the students will choose to become) as the most memorable. Our results indicate that students found the sociotechnical aspects of the course more memorable than the traditional canonical engineering content. These findings suggest that framing engineering content as sociotechnical can be one strategy to increase student engagement, increase memorability of lessons, and help students to think more deeply about their own goals as future engineers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy
International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
35.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Virtual Laboratory Learning Environment: VLLE on Metaverse for University in Thailand MapReduce Solutions Classification by Their Implementation Implementation of New-Product Creativity through an Engineering Design Process to Foster Engineering Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills Contribution of Online Tutoring in Promoting the Quality of Distance Learning for Moroccan Teachers Spatial Strategies Employed by Blind and Low-Vision (BLV) Individuals on the Tactile Mental Cutting Test (TMCT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1