{"title":"政府和企业如何参与南京市无桩共享单车项目的协同治理?","authors":"Jun Cao, J. Prior, Dasong Gu, D. Giurco","doi":"10.1080/08111146.2022.2115478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While existing studies have broadly examined the collaborative governance of dockless bike-sharing schemes (DBSS) in global cities, few provide detailed insights into how DBSS stakeholders engage in particular cultural contexts. This paper addresses this gap through a case study of government and industry interactions in Nanjing’s DBSS from 2017 to 2020. Our approach is informed by the Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. We draw on qualitative analysis of policies and interviews with government officials and industry leaders. A key finding is the shift from centralised to distributed power dynamics among stakeholders, affirming the need for culturally-specific studies of collaborative governance.","PeriodicalId":47081,"journal":{"name":"Urban Policy and Research","volume":"41 1","pages":"330 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Government and Industry Engage in the Collaborative Governance of Dockless Bike-sharing Schemes in Nanjing, China?\",\"authors\":\"Jun Cao, J. Prior, Dasong Gu, D. Giurco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08111146.2022.2115478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT While existing studies have broadly examined the collaborative governance of dockless bike-sharing schemes (DBSS) in global cities, few provide detailed insights into how DBSS stakeholders engage in particular cultural contexts. This paper addresses this gap through a case study of government and industry interactions in Nanjing’s DBSS from 2017 to 2020. Our approach is informed by the Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. We draw on qualitative analysis of policies and interviews with government officials and industry leaders. A key finding is the shift from centralised to distributed power dynamics among stakeholders, affirming the need for culturally-specific studies of collaborative governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Policy and Research\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"330 - 344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Policy and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2022.2115478\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Policy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2022.2115478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Do Government and Industry Engage in the Collaborative Governance of Dockless Bike-sharing Schemes in Nanjing, China?
ABSTRACT While existing studies have broadly examined the collaborative governance of dockless bike-sharing schemes (DBSS) in global cities, few provide detailed insights into how DBSS stakeholders engage in particular cultural contexts. This paper addresses this gap through a case study of government and industry interactions in Nanjing’s DBSS from 2017 to 2020. Our approach is informed by the Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. We draw on qualitative analysis of policies and interviews with government officials and industry leaders. A key finding is the shift from centralised to distributed power dynamics among stakeholders, affirming the need for culturally-specific studies of collaborative governance.