恐怖时代的灵魂关怀与城邦

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION Journal of Pastoral Theology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10649867.2020.1722364
Danjuma Gibson, K. S. Lee
{"title":"恐怖时代的灵魂关怀与城邦","authors":"Danjuma Gibson, K. S. Lee","doi":"10.1080/10649867.2020.1722364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Violence and injustice are being levied against immigrant groups, black and brown bodies, and LBGTQ+ persons in the current sociopolitical environment. A kind of reactionary terror has taken on a greater intensity over the last several years, and is being normalized and justified as an effort to restore law andorder, giving a rise to a political slogan such as ‘MakeAmerica great again.’Pastoral theologians question what it means to be living in an age of terror andwhat it means to care for souls and our polis. Aptly, the theme of the 2019 study conference of Society for Pastoral Theology (SPT) held in Denver, Colorado from June 12–15 was Resistance and Resilience in an Age of Terror: Care of Souls, Care of Polis. The plenaries, work-in-progress, and workshops in this conference highlighted scholarship and theological praxis that centered on personal/communal resilience and resistance to terror. An important feature of the 2019 study conference was an immersion experience to the Greater Denver Interfaith Alliance (GDIA), a nonprofit organization under the leadership of Dr. Carroll Watkins Ali. In this excursion, members were able to witness and experience a firsthand example of the kind of resistance and praxis that is possible in relation to the care of souls in the current sociopolitical environment. Dr. Mary Moschella was an invited ethnographer of the 2019 study conference, providing an overview of the immersion activities and experience. According to Moschella, the visit to the GDIA offered a compelling example of the integration of theory and praxis. Reminding pastoral theologians of our accountability to those who are suffering and/or exist at themargin,Moschella claims, ‘if we are called to care and to promote resistance and resilience, this experience demonstrated both how it can be done and that it can be done.’ Informed by his work in Embracing Hopelessness, Dr. Miguel De La Torre poses a provocative question to the participants of SPT: Can pastoral theology celebrate hopelessness? Outlining a history of abuses perpetuated against Black and Latinx bodies, by the western medical profession and society at large, De La Torre establishes a prima facia case for mistrust of the western Eurocentric establishment. He is ‘convinced that the production of all Eurocentric philosophical thought – across academic disciplines – are oppressive and repressive to those of us who occupy colonized spaces.’ De La Torre invites pastoral theologians to consider if their commonplace usage of the concept of hope is in fact doing more to undermine (than assist) the overall pastoral theological project. Examining the history of abuses perpetuated against Black and Latinx bodies by the western Eurocentric polis, and given that the guild of pastoral theology is also a production – in large part – of Eurocentric philosophical thought, De La Torre invites us to consider his concept of hopelessness as a redemptive praxis. De La Torre is positing hopelessness over and against hope as ‘a methodology which propels the marginalized towards concrete actions.’ Dr. Leanna Fuller offers a pastoral theological response to De La Torre. According to Fuller, while the field of pastoral theology (or any other guild) has been unduly informed by a Eurocentric interpretation, it does not necessarily follow that all pastoral theologians have subscribed to the deleterious understanding of hope that De La Torre outlines in his project. For Fuller, this would ignore the significant scholarship and work done by pastoral theologians over the past several decades –work and scholarship informed by Black theology, womanist theology, postcolonial theology, and a host of other resources designed to challenge hegemonic ideologies. Yet, in her response, while Fuller recognizes the methodological commitment to begin pastoral theological reflectionwith lived human experience, she challenges the guild to ask of itself: ‘Whose lived experiences aremost frequently deemedworthy of theological inquiry?’With such a provocative question","PeriodicalId":29885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pastoral Theology","volume":"30 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10649867.2020.1722364","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caring for Souls and Polis in the Age of Terror\",\"authors\":\"Danjuma Gibson, K. S. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10649867.2020.1722364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Violence and injustice are being levied against immigrant groups, black and brown bodies, and LBGTQ+ persons in the current sociopolitical environment. A kind of reactionary terror has taken on a greater intensity over the last several years, and is being normalized and justified as an effort to restore law andorder, giving a rise to a political slogan such as ‘MakeAmerica great again.’Pastoral theologians question what it means to be living in an age of terror andwhat it means to care for souls and our polis. Aptly, the theme of the 2019 study conference of Society for Pastoral Theology (SPT) held in Denver, Colorado from June 12–15 was Resistance and Resilience in an Age of Terror: Care of Souls, Care of Polis. The plenaries, work-in-progress, and workshops in this conference highlighted scholarship and theological praxis that centered on personal/communal resilience and resistance to terror. An important feature of the 2019 study conference was an immersion experience to the Greater Denver Interfaith Alliance (GDIA), a nonprofit organization under the leadership of Dr. Carroll Watkins Ali. In this excursion, members were able to witness and experience a firsthand example of the kind of resistance and praxis that is possible in relation to the care of souls in the current sociopolitical environment. Dr. Mary Moschella was an invited ethnographer of the 2019 study conference, providing an overview of the immersion activities and experience. According to Moschella, the visit to the GDIA offered a compelling example of the integration of theory and praxis. Reminding pastoral theologians of our accountability to those who are suffering and/or exist at themargin,Moschella claims, ‘if we are called to care and to promote resistance and resilience, this experience demonstrated both how it can be done and that it can be done.’ Informed by his work in Embracing Hopelessness, Dr. Miguel De La Torre poses a provocative question to the participants of SPT: Can pastoral theology celebrate hopelessness? Outlining a history of abuses perpetuated against Black and Latinx bodies, by the western medical profession and society at large, De La Torre establishes a prima facia case for mistrust of the western Eurocentric establishment. He is ‘convinced that the production of all Eurocentric philosophical thought – across academic disciplines – are oppressive and repressive to those of us who occupy colonized spaces.’ De La Torre invites pastoral theologians to consider if their commonplace usage of the concept of hope is in fact doing more to undermine (than assist) the overall pastoral theological project. Examining the history of abuses perpetuated against Black and Latinx bodies by the western Eurocentric polis, and given that the guild of pastoral theology is also a production – in large part – of Eurocentric philosophical thought, De La Torre invites us to consider his concept of hopelessness as a redemptive praxis. De La Torre is positing hopelessness over and against hope as ‘a methodology which propels the marginalized towards concrete actions.’ Dr. Leanna Fuller offers a pastoral theological response to De La Torre. According to Fuller, while the field of pastoral theology (or any other guild) has been unduly informed by a Eurocentric interpretation, it does not necessarily follow that all pastoral theologians have subscribed to the deleterious understanding of hope that De La Torre outlines in his project. For Fuller, this would ignore the significant scholarship and work done by pastoral theologians over the past several decades –work and scholarship informed by Black theology, womanist theology, postcolonial theology, and a host of other resources designed to challenge hegemonic ideologies. Yet, in her response, while Fuller recognizes the methodological commitment to begin pastoral theological reflectionwith lived human experience, she challenges the guild to ask of itself: ‘Whose lived experiences aremost frequently deemedworthy of theological inquiry?’With such a provocative question\",\"PeriodicalId\":29885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pastoral Theology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10649867.2020.1722364\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pastoral Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10649867.2020.1722364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pastoral Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10649867.2020.1722364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当前的社会政治环境中,针对移民群体、黑人和棕色人群、LBGTQ+群体的暴力和不公正正在被征收。在过去的几年里,一种反动的恐怖活动愈演愈烈,并被正常化和合理化为恢复法律和秩序的努力,从而产生了“让美国再次伟大”这样的政治口号。田园神学家质疑生活在一个恐怖的时代意味着什么,以及关心灵魂和我们的城邦意味着什么。恰好,6月12日至15日在科罗拉多州丹佛市举行的2019年牧灵神学学会(SPT)研究会议的主题是“恐怖时代的抵抗与韧性:灵魂的关怀,Polis的关怀”。本次会议的全体会议、正在进行的工作和研讨会突出了以个人/社区的韧性和对恐怖的抵抗为中心的学术和神学实践。2019年学习会议的一个重要特点是对大丹佛跨信仰联盟(GDIA)的沉浸式体验,这是卡罗尔·沃特金斯·阿里博士领导的非营利组织。在这次旅行中,成员们能够亲眼目睹和体验到在当前社会政治环境中可能与灵魂关怀有关的那种抵抗和实践的第一手例子。玛丽·莫舍拉(Mary Moschella)博士是2019年研究会议的特邀民族志学家,概述了浸入式活动和体验。根据Moschella的说法,对GDIA的访问提供了一个理论与实践相结合的引人注目的例子。提醒牧区神学家我们对那些受苦和/或生活在边缘的人的责任,Moschella声称,“如果我们被召唤去关心和促进抵抗和恢复,这个经历表明了它是如何做到的,它是可以做到的。”在《拥抱绝望》一书中,米格尔·德·拉·托雷博士向SPT的参与者提出了一个具有挑衅性的问题:教牧神学能歌颂绝望吗?De La Torre概述了西方医学界和整个社会长期虐待黑人和拉丁人身体的历史,初步证明了对以西欧为中心的机构的不信任。他确信,所有以欧洲为中心的哲学思想的产生——跨越学科——对我们这些占据殖民空间的人来说是压迫和压抑的。De La Torre邀请牧灵神学家考虑他们对希望概念的普遍使用实际上是否更多地破坏(而不是帮助)整个牧灵神学项目。考察了以西欧为中心的城邦对黑人和拉丁人的虐待历史,并考虑到牧灵神学公会在很大程度上也是以欧洲为中心的哲学思想的产物,De La Torre邀请我们将他的绝望概念视为一种救赎实践。De La Torre将绝望置于希望之上,并将其作为“一种推动边缘化人群采取具体行动的方法”。Leanna Fuller博士对De La Torre做出了牧灵神学的回应。富勒认为,虽然牧灵神学领域(或任何其他行会)被以欧洲为中心的解释不当地告知,但这并不一定意味着所有牧灵神学家都赞同德拉托雷在他的项目中概述的对希望的有害理解。对富勒来说,这将忽略过去几十年里牧区神学家所做的重要学术研究和工作——黑人神学、女性主义神学、后殖民神学和许多其他旨在挑战霸权意识形态的资源。然而,在她的回应中,虽然富勒认识到从人类生活经验开始教牧神学反思的方法论承诺,但她挑战公会问自己:“谁的生活经历最常被认为值得神学探究?”这样一个挑衅性的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caring for Souls and Polis in the Age of Terror
Violence and injustice are being levied against immigrant groups, black and brown bodies, and LBGTQ+ persons in the current sociopolitical environment. A kind of reactionary terror has taken on a greater intensity over the last several years, and is being normalized and justified as an effort to restore law andorder, giving a rise to a political slogan such as ‘MakeAmerica great again.’Pastoral theologians question what it means to be living in an age of terror andwhat it means to care for souls and our polis. Aptly, the theme of the 2019 study conference of Society for Pastoral Theology (SPT) held in Denver, Colorado from June 12–15 was Resistance and Resilience in an Age of Terror: Care of Souls, Care of Polis. The plenaries, work-in-progress, and workshops in this conference highlighted scholarship and theological praxis that centered on personal/communal resilience and resistance to terror. An important feature of the 2019 study conference was an immersion experience to the Greater Denver Interfaith Alliance (GDIA), a nonprofit organization under the leadership of Dr. Carroll Watkins Ali. In this excursion, members were able to witness and experience a firsthand example of the kind of resistance and praxis that is possible in relation to the care of souls in the current sociopolitical environment. Dr. Mary Moschella was an invited ethnographer of the 2019 study conference, providing an overview of the immersion activities and experience. According to Moschella, the visit to the GDIA offered a compelling example of the integration of theory and praxis. Reminding pastoral theologians of our accountability to those who are suffering and/or exist at themargin,Moschella claims, ‘if we are called to care and to promote resistance and resilience, this experience demonstrated both how it can be done and that it can be done.’ Informed by his work in Embracing Hopelessness, Dr. Miguel De La Torre poses a provocative question to the participants of SPT: Can pastoral theology celebrate hopelessness? Outlining a history of abuses perpetuated against Black and Latinx bodies, by the western medical profession and society at large, De La Torre establishes a prima facia case for mistrust of the western Eurocentric establishment. He is ‘convinced that the production of all Eurocentric philosophical thought – across academic disciplines – are oppressive and repressive to those of us who occupy colonized spaces.’ De La Torre invites pastoral theologians to consider if their commonplace usage of the concept of hope is in fact doing more to undermine (than assist) the overall pastoral theological project. Examining the history of abuses perpetuated against Black and Latinx bodies by the western Eurocentric polis, and given that the guild of pastoral theology is also a production – in large part – of Eurocentric philosophical thought, De La Torre invites us to consider his concept of hopelessness as a redemptive praxis. De La Torre is positing hopelessness over and against hope as ‘a methodology which propels the marginalized towards concrete actions.’ Dr. Leanna Fuller offers a pastoral theological response to De La Torre. According to Fuller, while the field of pastoral theology (or any other guild) has been unduly informed by a Eurocentric interpretation, it does not necessarily follow that all pastoral theologians have subscribed to the deleterious understanding of hope that De La Torre outlines in his project. For Fuller, this would ignore the significant scholarship and work done by pastoral theologians over the past several decades –work and scholarship informed by Black theology, womanist theology, postcolonial theology, and a host of other resources designed to challenge hegemonic ideologies. Yet, in her response, while Fuller recognizes the methodological commitment to begin pastoral theological reflectionwith lived human experience, she challenges the guild to ask of itself: ‘Whose lived experiences aremost frequently deemedworthy of theological inquiry?’With such a provocative question
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Spanish-Speaking Afro-Caribbean Greater Antillean Multiple Spiritual/Religious Belonging and Post/Decolonial Spiritual Care Proposal: A Case Study Midwifing Social Movements: How Movement Chaplains Practice Pastoral Theology Through Accessible, Critical, and Collective Spiritual Care Shelter Theology: The Religious Lives of People Without Homes Out Standing in the Field: Qualitative Research in Pastoral Theology and Care [Potential for infusion correction of COVID-19-associated endotheliopathy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1