校园里的部落主义:派系、iGen和对言论自由的威胁

Joseph Russomanno
{"title":"校园里的部落主义:派系、iGen和对言论自由的威胁","authors":"Joseph Russomanno","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2019.1660554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The American college campus is potentially the quintessential marketplace of ideas – the ideal locale for the free and open exchange of concepts and viewpoints, discussion and debate, and the discovery and sharing of knowledge. The setting, however, has not always materialized in that idyllic fashion. Speech freedom on campus, while challenged over time, is being tested by unique influences in the twenty-first century. Now, speakers are disinvited or shouted down, with violent protests sometimes erupting. Fear of trauma abridges classroom discussion. As the nation tribalizes, so do college students – members of iGen, psychologically fragile and raised in a culture of “safetyism.” This article examines the interconnectedness of these issues. It also invokes factions – the tribalism of America’s founding era – and illustrates how James Madison’s approach to control factionalism can be applied to the free speech challenge on the contemporary campus.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"24 1","pages":"539 - 586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2019.1660554","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tribalism on Campus: Factions, iGen and the Threat to Free Speech\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Russomanno\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10811680.2019.1660554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The American college campus is potentially the quintessential marketplace of ideas – the ideal locale for the free and open exchange of concepts and viewpoints, discussion and debate, and the discovery and sharing of knowledge. The setting, however, has not always materialized in that idyllic fashion. Speech freedom on campus, while challenged over time, is being tested by unique influences in the twenty-first century. Now, speakers are disinvited or shouted down, with violent protests sometimes erupting. Fear of trauma abridges classroom discussion. As the nation tribalizes, so do college students – members of iGen, psychologically fragile and raised in a culture of “safetyism.” This article examines the interconnectedness of these issues. It also invokes factions – the tribalism of America’s founding era – and illustrates how James Madison’s approach to control factionalism can be applied to the free speech challenge on the contemporary campus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"539 - 586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2019.1660554\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2019.1660554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2019.1660554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国大学校园可能是典型的思想市场,是自由开放地交换概念和观点、讨论和辩论以及发现和分享知识的理想场所。然而,场景并不总是以田园诗般的方式出现。校园言论自由虽然随着时间的推移而受到挑战,但在21世纪正受到独特影响的考验。现在,演讲者被取消邀请或被叫停,有时还会爆发暴力抗议。对创伤的恐惧阻碍了课堂讨论。随着国家部落化,大学生也是如此——iGen的成员,心理脆弱,在“安全主义”文化中长大。本文探讨了这些问题的相互联系。它还援引了派系——美国建国时代的部落主义——并说明了詹姆斯·麦迪逊控制派系斗争的方法如何应用于当代校园的言论自由挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tribalism on Campus: Factions, iGen and the Threat to Free Speech
The American college campus is potentially the quintessential marketplace of ideas – the ideal locale for the free and open exchange of concepts and viewpoints, discussion and debate, and the discovery and sharing of knowledge. The setting, however, has not always materialized in that idyllic fashion. Speech freedom on campus, while challenged over time, is being tested by unique influences in the twenty-first century. Now, speakers are disinvited or shouted down, with violent protests sometimes erupting. Fear of trauma abridges classroom discussion. As the nation tribalizes, so do college students – members of iGen, psychologically fragile and raised in a culture of “safetyism.” This article examines the interconnectedness of these issues. It also invokes factions – the tribalism of America’s founding era – and illustrates how James Madison’s approach to control factionalism can be applied to the free speech challenge on the contemporary campus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The societal, cultural, economic and political dimensions of communication, including the freedoms of speech and press, are undergoing dramatic global changes. The convergence of the mass media, telecommunications, and computers has raised important questions reflected in analyses of modern communication law, policy, and regulation. Serving as a forum for discussions of these continuing and emerging questions, Communication Law and Policy considers traditional and contemporary problems of freedom of expression and dissemination, including theoretical, conceptual and methodological issues inherent in the special conditions presented by new media and information technologies.
期刊最新文献
Digital Rights in Europe After the Entry Into Force of Regulations for the Protection of Personal Data: Before and After the Right to Be Forgotten Regulatory Capture in a Transitional Democracy: Media Laws in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq Paranoid Androids: Free Speech Versus Privacy in America’s Resistance Against Intrusive Robocalls An Unreasonable Standard?: The Dilemma of Applying Actual Malice to Irrational Speakers “The Gloss of History”: A Historical Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Justices’ Framing of First Amendment Press Rights to Cover and Access Court Proceedings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1