使用抗生素自行用药与购买名牌药物之间的关系:秘鲁一项全国性调查的分析

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI:10.1093/jphsr/rmad015
Jerry K. Benites-Meza, P. Herrera-Añazco, Arón A Santillán-Rodríguez, Carlos J. Zumarán-Nuñez, Luz C. Barturén-Alvarado, Vicente A Benites Zapata
{"title":"使用抗生素自行用药与购买名牌药物之间的关系:秘鲁一项全国性调查的分析","authors":"Jerry K. Benites-Meza, P. Herrera-Añazco, Arón A Santillán-Rodríguez, Carlos J. Zumarán-Nuñez, Luz C. Barturén-Alvarado, Vicente A Benites Zapata","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmad015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To determine the association between self-medication with antibiotics (SMA) and purchase of brand-name drugs in Peru.\n \n \n \n A secondary analysis was conducted using a nationally representative survey from 2014 to 2016. The exposure variable was self-medication (SM), which is defined as the purchase of drugs for self-administration without a medical prescription. The study outcome was the purchase of brand-name drugs (yes/no). Sociodemographic variables, such as health insurance and type of institution, were considered as confounders. To assess the association between SMA and the purchase of brand-name drugs, the crude prevalence ratios (cPR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were calculated with their confidence intervals at 95% (95% CI) using a Poisson-type generalized linear model and considering the complex survey design.\n \n \n \n A total of 1862 participants were analysed; 54.4% of the participants were women with a mean age of 39.3 years. The prevalence rate of SMA was 54.3%, whereas that of the purchase of brand-name drugs was 55.3%. The adjusted Poisson regression analysis showed an association between SMA and the purchase of brand-name drugs (aPR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.18–1.37; P < 0.001).\n \n \n \n It was found that 5 of 10 respondents SMA. Approximately 6 of 10 respondents that SMA used brand-name drugs. SMA is associated with a higher probability of purchasing brand-name drugs.\n","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between self-medication with antibiotics and purchase of brand-name drugs: analysis of a national survey in Peru\",\"authors\":\"Jerry K. Benites-Meza, P. Herrera-Añazco, Arón A Santillán-Rodríguez, Carlos J. Zumarán-Nuñez, Luz C. Barturén-Alvarado, Vicente A Benites Zapata\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jphsr/rmad015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n To determine the association between self-medication with antibiotics (SMA) and purchase of brand-name drugs in Peru.\\n \\n \\n \\n A secondary analysis was conducted using a nationally representative survey from 2014 to 2016. The exposure variable was self-medication (SM), which is defined as the purchase of drugs for self-administration without a medical prescription. The study outcome was the purchase of brand-name drugs (yes/no). Sociodemographic variables, such as health insurance and type of institution, were considered as confounders. To assess the association between SMA and the purchase of brand-name drugs, the crude prevalence ratios (cPR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were calculated with their confidence intervals at 95% (95% CI) using a Poisson-type generalized linear model and considering the complex survey design.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 1862 participants were analysed; 54.4% of the participants were women with a mean age of 39.3 years. The prevalence rate of SMA was 54.3%, whereas that of the purchase of brand-name drugs was 55.3%. The adjusted Poisson regression analysis showed an association between SMA and the purchase of brand-name drugs (aPR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.18–1.37; P < 0.001).\\n \\n \\n \\n It was found that 5 of 10 respondents SMA. Approximately 6 of 10 respondents that SMA used brand-name drugs. SMA is associated with a higher probability of purchasing brand-name drugs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmad015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmad015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在秘鲁,确定抗生素自我用药(SMA)与购买名牌药物之间的关系。第二次分析是在2014年至2016年进行的一项具有全国代表性的调查。暴露变量为自我用药(SM),定义为在没有医生处方的情况下自行购买药物。研究结果是购买品牌药(是/否)。社会人口变量,如医疗保险和机构类型,被认为是混杂因素。为了评估SMA与购买名牌药之间的关系,采用poisson型广义线性模型并考虑复杂的调查设计,计算粗患病率(cPR)和调整患病率(aPR),其置信区间为95% (95% CI)。总共分析了1862名参与者;54.4%的参与者是女性,平均年龄为39.3岁。SMA的患病率为54.3%,而购买名牌药的患病率为55.3%。经校正泊松回归分析,SMA与品牌药购买存在相关性(aPR = 1.28;95% ci: 1.18-1.37;P < 0.001)。结果发现,10名受访者中有5名SMA。大约6 / 10的受访者表示SMA使用了品牌药。SMA与购买名牌药物的可能性较高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between self-medication with antibiotics and purchase of brand-name drugs: analysis of a national survey in Peru
To determine the association between self-medication with antibiotics (SMA) and purchase of brand-name drugs in Peru. A secondary analysis was conducted using a nationally representative survey from 2014 to 2016. The exposure variable was self-medication (SM), which is defined as the purchase of drugs for self-administration without a medical prescription. The study outcome was the purchase of brand-name drugs (yes/no). Sociodemographic variables, such as health insurance and type of institution, were considered as confounders. To assess the association between SMA and the purchase of brand-name drugs, the crude prevalence ratios (cPR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were calculated with their confidence intervals at 95% (95% CI) using a Poisson-type generalized linear model and considering the complex survey design. A total of 1862 participants were analysed; 54.4% of the participants were women with a mean age of 39.3 years. The prevalence rate of SMA was 54.3%, whereas that of the purchase of brand-name drugs was 55.3%. The adjusted Poisson regression analysis showed an association between SMA and the purchase of brand-name drugs (aPR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.18–1.37; P < 0.001). It was found that 5 of 10 respondents SMA. Approximately 6 of 10 respondents that SMA used brand-name drugs. SMA is associated with a higher probability of purchasing brand-name drugs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The revised patient attitudes to deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire: an investigation using a large anonymized database Evaluation of a structured pharmacist-led intervention on glycemic control in underprivileged diabetic patients: a randomized open-label trial Cross-sectional study of pharmacists’ knowledge and beliefs about human papillomavirus, its vaccines, and barriers related to vaccine administration Analysis of cancer drugs receiving FDA’s Accelerated Approval between 1992 and 2021 Navigating digital health: perspectives of Australian community pharmacists—a short communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1