巴西淡水沉积物生态风险评价

IF 0.5 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.5327/Z2176-947820180234
E. Cervi, C. Poleto
{"title":"巴西淡水沉积物生态风险评价","authors":"E. Cervi, C. Poleto","doi":"10.5327/Z2176-947820180234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the past 40 years, ecological risk assessments (ERA) were beingperformed by different organizations, using different various principles andmethods, with little or no communication and inconsistencies betweenthe different many assessment methodologies. Brazil still does not have aregulation based on quality criteria for sediments. Also, ERA approach hasonly been introduced here, and detailed guidance on how to interpret andapply these frameworks is still generally inadequate. In our paper, ERAframework and its application around the globe is are presented. Also,some promising future directions in ERA are briefly discussed, and criticalchallenges to future success of this tool in Brazil are identified.","PeriodicalId":33560,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological risk assessment of freshwater sediments in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"E. Cervi, C. Poleto\",\"doi\":\"10.5327/Z2176-947820180234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the past 40 years, ecological risk assessments (ERA) were beingperformed by different organizations, using different various principles andmethods, with little or no communication and inconsistencies betweenthe different many assessment methodologies. Brazil still does not have aregulation based on quality criteria for sediments. Also, ERA approach hasonly been introduced here, and detailed guidance on how to interpret andapply these frameworks is still generally inadequate. In our paper, ERAframework and its application around the globe is are presented. Also,some promising future directions in ERA are briefly discussed, and criticalchallenges to future success of this tool in Brazil are identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-947820180234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-947820180234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的40年里,不同的组织使用不同的原则和方法进行生态风险评估,不同的评估方法之间很少或根本没有沟通和不一致。巴西仍然没有基于沉积物质量标准的法规。此外,这里只介绍了ERA方法,关于如何解释和应用这些框架的详细指导仍然普遍不足。本文介绍了ERA框架及其在全球的应用。此外,还简要讨论了ERA的一些有前景的未来方向,并确定了该工具在巴西未来成功的关键挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecological risk assessment of freshwater sediments in Brazil
During the past 40 years, ecological risk assessments (ERA) were beingperformed by different organizations, using different various principles andmethods, with little or no communication and inconsistencies betweenthe different many assessment methodologies. Brazil still does not have aregulation based on quality criteria for sediments. Also, ERA approach hasonly been introduced here, and detailed guidance on how to interpret andapply these frameworks is still generally inadequate. In our paper, ERAframework and its application around the globe is are presented. Also,some promising future directions in ERA are briefly discussed, and criticalchallenges to future success of this tool in Brazil are identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Water loss associated with food loss and waste in Brazil Model of integrated territorial assessment for environmental justice applied to sanitation Study on Brazilian agribusiness wastewaters: composition, physical‑chemical characterization, volumetric production and resource recovery Optimization of palm oil biodiesel production using response surface methodology Stock and indices of carbon management under different soil use systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1