书评:儿童用数码平板电脑的游戏练习伊莎贝尔·弗罗萨梅斯著

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Mobile Media & Communication Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1177/20501579221104625b
Chikezie E. Uzuegbunam
{"title":"书评:儿童用数码平板电脑的游戏练习伊莎贝尔·弗罗萨梅斯著","authors":"Chikezie E. Uzuegbunam","doi":"10.1177/20501579221104625b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"in Taipei were the least likely news consumers via their mobile phones. Interestingly, this difference did not appear statistically significant in the survey of 2017–2018. It is noteworthy that students under stricter news media supervision in cities (e.g., Shanghai) reportedly perceived mobile news to be more credible than those living in cities where press freedom is ranked higher (e.g., Taipei). This appears both counter-intuitive and fascinating. This timely and much-needed work paves the way for future research concerning news consumption behavior and its relationship with mobile technologies. Wei and Lo argue that mobile technologies afford users portability, interactivity, and mobility. Researchers can, for example, study how such affordances influence ordinary users’ sense of interpersonal distance between both journalists and governments. This may influence the extent to which users perceive freedom from these affordances. It is possible that mobility or portability that is often interpreted as a democratizing affordance may close the distance between government, journalists, and users. Thus, it may be important to consider not only how users are motivated to seek information through mobile phones, but also whether they perceive surveillance by political actors. By extension, understanding the affordances of mobile news from the perspectives of journalists and government may also strengthen our understanding of mobile communication in a civil society.","PeriodicalId":46650,"journal":{"name":"Mobile Media & Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Young children's play practices with digital tablets by Isabel Froés\",\"authors\":\"Chikezie E. Uzuegbunam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20501579221104625b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"in Taipei were the least likely news consumers via their mobile phones. Interestingly, this difference did not appear statistically significant in the survey of 2017–2018. It is noteworthy that students under stricter news media supervision in cities (e.g., Shanghai) reportedly perceived mobile news to be more credible than those living in cities where press freedom is ranked higher (e.g., Taipei). This appears both counter-intuitive and fascinating. This timely and much-needed work paves the way for future research concerning news consumption behavior and its relationship with mobile technologies. Wei and Lo argue that mobile technologies afford users portability, interactivity, and mobility. Researchers can, for example, study how such affordances influence ordinary users’ sense of interpersonal distance between both journalists and governments. This may influence the extent to which users perceive freedom from these affordances. It is possible that mobility or portability that is often interpreted as a democratizing affordance may close the distance between government, journalists, and users. Thus, it may be important to consider not only how users are motivated to seek information through mobile phones, but also whether they perceive surveillance by political actors. By extension, understanding the affordances of mobile news from the perspectives of journalists and government may also strengthen our understanding of mobile communication in a civil society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mobile Media & Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mobile Media & Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221104625b\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobile Media & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221104625b","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

是最不可能通过手机购买新闻的人。有趣的是,在2017-2018年的调查中,这种差异在统计上并不显著。值得注意的是,据报道,生活在新闻媒体监管更严格的城市(如上海)的学生比生活在新闻自由排名较高的城市(如台北)的学生认为移动新闻更可信。这似乎既违反直觉,又令人着迷。这项及时而急需的工作为未来关于新闻消费行为及其与移动技术关系的研究铺平了道路。Wei和Lo认为,移动技术为用户提供了可移植性、交互性和移动性。例如,研究人员可以研究这些支持如何影响普通用户对记者和政府之间的人际距离感。这可能会影响用户从这些功能中获得自由的程度。移动性或便携性通常被解释为一种民主化的能力,这可能会拉近政府、记者和用户之间的距离。因此,重要的是不仅要考虑用户是如何通过手机寻求信息的,还要考虑他们是否认为受到政治行为者的监视。推而广之,从记者和政府的角度来理解移动新闻的支持,也可以加强我们对公民社会中移动通信的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Young children's play practices with digital tablets by Isabel Froés
in Taipei were the least likely news consumers via their mobile phones. Interestingly, this difference did not appear statistically significant in the survey of 2017–2018. It is noteworthy that students under stricter news media supervision in cities (e.g., Shanghai) reportedly perceived mobile news to be more credible than those living in cities where press freedom is ranked higher (e.g., Taipei). This appears both counter-intuitive and fascinating. This timely and much-needed work paves the way for future research concerning news consumption behavior and its relationship with mobile technologies. Wei and Lo argue that mobile technologies afford users portability, interactivity, and mobility. Researchers can, for example, study how such affordances influence ordinary users’ sense of interpersonal distance between both journalists and governments. This may influence the extent to which users perceive freedom from these affordances. It is possible that mobility or portability that is often interpreted as a democratizing affordance may close the distance between government, journalists, and users. Thus, it may be important to consider not only how users are motivated to seek information through mobile phones, but also whether they perceive surveillance by political actors. By extension, understanding the affordances of mobile news from the perspectives of journalists and government may also strengthen our understanding of mobile communication in a civil society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
16.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Mobile Media & Communication is a peer-reviewed forum for international, interdisciplinary academic research on the dynamic field of mobile media and communication. Mobile Media & Communication draws on a wide and continually renewed range of disciplines, engaging broadly in the concept of mobility itself.
期刊最新文献
How do smartphone users access the internet? An exploratory analysis of mobile web browser use Eco-Warrior: A theory-based mobile app intervention for forming and sustaining pro-environmental habits Off-grid? Resistant media operations by delivery gig workers in response to app-based tracking Ear buddies: A moderated mediation model of the effect of mobility on parasocial relationships with podcast hosts Sharing is caring: The positive role of smartphone co-use in social dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1