学生对教学评价的偏见:2012年至2021年研究的系统回顾

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI:10.7202/1095482ar
B. Stoesz, Amy E. De Jaeger, Matthew S. Quesnel, Dimple Bhojwani, Ryan Los
{"title":"学生对教学评价的偏见:2012年至2021年研究的系统回顾","authors":"B. Stoesz, Amy E. De Jaeger, Matthew S. Quesnel, Dimple Bhojwani, Ryan Los","doi":"10.7202/1095482ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Student ratings of instruction (SRI) are commonly used to evaluate courses and teaching in higher education. Much debate about their validity in evaluating teaching exists, which is due to concerns of bias by factors unrelated to teaching quality (Spooren et al., 2013). Our objective was to identify peer-reviewed original research published in English from January 1, 2012, to March 10, 2021, on potential sources of bias in SRIs. Our systematic review of 63 articles demonstrated strong support for the continued existence of gender bias, favoring male instructors and bias against faculty with minority ethnic and cultural backgrounds. These and other biases must be considered when implementing SRIs and reviewing results. Critical practices for reducing bias when using SRIs include implementing bias awareness training and avoiding use of SRIs as a singular measure of teaching quality when making decisions for teaching development or hiring and promotion.","PeriodicalId":43834,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bias in Student Ratings of Instruction: A Systematic Review of Research from 2012 to 2021\",\"authors\":\"B. Stoesz, Amy E. De Jaeger, Matthew S. Quesnel, Dimple Bhojwani, Ryan Los\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1095482ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Student ratings of instruction (SRI) are commonly used to evaluate courses and teaching in higher education. Much debate about their validity in evaluating teaching exists, which is due to concerns of bias by factors unrelated to teaching quality (Spooren et al., 2013). Our objective was to identify peer-reviewed original research published in English from January 1, 2012, to March 10, 2021, on potential sources of bias in SRIs. Our systematic review of 63 articles demonstrated strong support for the continued existence of gender bias, favoring male instructors and bias against faculty with minority ethnic and cultural backgrounds. These and other biases must be considered when implementing SRIs and reviewing results. Critical practices for reducing bias when using SRIs include implementing bias awareness training and avoiding use of SRIs as a singular measure of teaching quality when making decisions for teaching development or hiring and promotion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1095482ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1095482ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

学生教学评分(SRI)通常用于评估高等教育中的课程和教学。关于它们在评估教学中的有效性存在很多争论,这是由于担心与教学质量无关的因素会产生偏见(sporen et al., 2013)。我们的目标是确定2012年1月1日至2021年3月10日发表的同行评议的英文原创研究,这些研究涉及sri的潜在偏倚来源。我们对63篇文章的系统回顾有力地支持了性别偏见的持续存在,偏袒男性教师和对少数民族和文化背景的教师的偏见。在实施sri和审查结果时,必须考虑到这些和其他偏差。在使用sri时减少偏见的关键做法包括实施偏见意识培训,以及在制定教学发展或招聘和晋升决策时避免将sri作为教学质量的单一衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bias in Student Ratings of Instruction: A Systematic Review of Research from 2012 to 2021
Student ratings of instruction (SRI) are commonly used to evaluate courses and teaching in higher education. Much debate about their validity in evaluating teaching exists, which is due to concerns of bias by factors unrelated to teaching quality (Spooren et al., 2013). Our objective was to identify peer-reviewed original research published in English from January 1, 2012, to March 10, 2021, on potential sources of bias in SRIs. Our systematic review of 63 articles demonstrated strong support for the continued existence of gender bias, favoring male instructors and bias against faculty with minority ethnic and cultural backgrounds. These and other biases must be considered when implementing SRIs and reviewing results. Critical practices for reducing bias when using SRIs include implementing bias awareness training and avoiding use of SRIs as a singular measure of teaching quality when making decisions for teaching development or hiring and promotion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Examining the Virtual Leadership of Leaders in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study Educational Politics and Policy Change in Neoliberal Times: An Argumentative Discourse Analysis Flourishing School Leadership: Perspectives of Canada’s Outstanding Principals Academic Women’s Labour During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature Les diplômés d’immersion française et leurs motivations liées au choix de la langue dans la poursuite des études postsecondaires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1