“雷曼兄弟姐妹”能减少银行的风险承担吗?国际证据

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Corporate Governance-An International Review Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1111/corg.12530
Anh Hoang, Qiongbing Wu
{"title":"“雷曼兄弟姐妹”能减少银行的风险承担吗?国际证据","authors":"Anh Hoang,&nbsp;Qiongbing Wu","doi":"10.1111/corg.12530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research question/issue</h3>\n \n <p>Since the global financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, board gender diversity has attracted growing attention among academia and policy makers. The “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis argues for more female representation on bank director boards based on the stereotyped gender gap in risk preference, which has been widely supported by empirical studies on nonfinancial firms. However, due to the constraint of data unavailability, empirical research on board gender diversity and bank risk-taking is relatively scarce and mostly confined to individual developed markets with inconclusive findings. In this paper, we examine the impact of board gender diversity on bank risk-taking using a large hand-collected dataset covering 480 commercial banks across 18 developed and 21 developing countries over the period 2007–2016.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research findings/insights</h3>\n \n <p>We find that lower bank risk-taking is associated with greater board gender diversity, supporting the “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis in the international context; however, this effect is significantly weakened in countries with more hostile perception toward working women. We also confirm the critical threshold of three female directors to play a significant role in reducing bank risk-taking, providing novel international evidence in support of the critical mass theory from the banking sector.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Theoretical/academic implications</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings help to reconcile existing contradictory empirical evidence from different countries by highlighting the importance of cultural effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practitioner/policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>We provide the first international empirical evidence in support of the policies aimed to promote representation of women on director boards, particularly in the banking sector. We confirm that a critical mass number of female directors on a bank board is important to avoid the tokenism problem. In countries with less support toward working women, policy makers also need to work on improving the overall working environment for women in order to achieve the expected outcome.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48209,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance-An International Review","volume":"32 2","pages":"297-321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/corg.12530","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could “Lehman Sisters” reduce bank risk-taking? International evidence\",\"authors\":\"Anh Hoang,&nbsp;Qiongbing Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/corg.12530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Research question/issue</h3>\\n \\n <p>Since the global financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, board gender diversity has attracted growing attention among academia and policy makers. The “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis argues for more female representation on bank director boards based on the stereotyped gender gap in risk preference, which has been widely supported by empirical studies on nonfinancial firms. However, due to the constraint of data unavailability, empirical research on board gender diversity and bank risk-taking is relatively scarce and mostly confined to individual developed markets with inconclusive findings. In this paper, we examine the impact of board gender diversity on bank risk-taking using a large hand-collected dataset covering 480 commercial banks across 18 developed and 21 developing countries over the period 2007–2016.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Research findings/insights</h3>\\n \\n <p>We find that lower bank risk-taking is associated with greater board gender diversity, supporting the “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis in the international context; however, this effect is significantly weakened in countries with more hostile perception toward working women. We also confirm the critical threshold of three female directors to play a significant role in reducing bank risk-taking, providing novel international evidence in support of the critical mass theory from the banking sector.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Theoretical/academic implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings help to reconcile existing contradictory empirical evidence from different countries by highlighting the importance of cultural effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Practitioner/policy implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>We provide the first international empirical evidence in support of the policies aimed to promote representation of women on director boards, particularly in the banking sector. We confirm that a critical mass number of female directors on a bank board is important to avoid the tokenism problem. In countries with less support toward working women, policy makers also need to work on improving the overall working environment for women in order to achieve the expected outcome.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance-An International Review\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"297-321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/corg.12530\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance-An International Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/corg.12530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance-An International Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/corg.12530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题 自雷曼兄弟公司倒闭引发全球金融危机以来,董事会的性别多元化问题日益受到学术界和政策制定者的关注。雷曼姐妹 "假说认为,基于风险偏好性别差异的刻板印象,银行董事局中应增加女性代表,这已得到非金融企业实证研究的广泛支持。然而,由于数据缺乏的限制,有关董事会性别多元化和银行风险承担的实证研究相对较少,且大多局限于个别发达市场,研究结果并不确定。在本文中,我们利用手工收集的大型数据集,研究了 2007-2016 年间 18 个发达国家和 21 个发展中国家的 480 家商业银行的董事会性别多元化对银行风险承担的影响。 研究结果/启示 我们发现,银行风险承担较低与董事会性别多元化程度较高有关,这在国际范围内支持了 "雷曼姐妹 "假说;然而,在对职业女性抱有较多敌意的国家,这种影响明显减弱。我们还证实了三位女性董事在降低银行风险承担方面发挥重要作用的临界门槛,为支持银行业的临界质量理论提供了新的国际证据。 理论/学术意义 我们的研究结果强调了文化效应的重要性,有助于调和不同国家现有的相互矛盾的经验证据。 对实践者/政策的影响 我们首次提供了国际经验证据,以支持旨在促进女性在董事会中的代表性的政策,尤其是在银行业。我们证实,银行董事会中女性董事的临界数量对于避免象征性问题非常重要。在对职业女性支持较少的国家,决策者还需要努力改善妇女的整体工作环境,以实现预期成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Could “Lehman Sisters” reduce bank risk-taking? International evidence

Research question/issue

Since the global financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, board gender diversity has attracted growing attention among academia and policy makers. The “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis argues for more female representation on bank director boards based on the stereotyped gender gap in risk preference, which has been widely supported by empirical studies on nonfinancial firms. However, due to the constraint of data unavailability, empirical research on board gender diversity and bank risk-taking is relatively scarce and mostly confined to individual developed markets with inconclusive findings. In this paper, we examine the impact of board gender diversity on bank risk-taking using a large hand-collected dataset covering 480 commercial banks across 18 developed and 21 developing countries over the period 2007–2016.

Research findings/insights

We find that lower bank risk-taking is associated with greater board gender diversity, supporting the “Lehman Sisters” hypothesis in the international context; however, this effect is significantly weakened in countries with more hostile perception toward working women. We also confirm the critical threshold of three female directors to play a significant role in reducing bank risk-taking, providing novel international evidence in support of the critical mass theory from the banking sector.

Theoretical/academic implications

Our findings help to reconcile existing contradictory empirical evidence from different countries by highlighting the importance of cultural effects.

Practitioner/policy implications

We provide the first international empirical evidence in support of the policies aimed to promote representation of women on director boards, particularly in the banking sector. We confirm that a critical mass number of female directors on a bank board is important to avoid the tokenism problem. In countries with less support toward working women, policy makers also need to work on improving the overall working environment for women in order to achieve the expected outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.30%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: The mission of Corporate Governance: An International Review is to publish cutting-edge international business research on the phenomena of comparative corporate governance throughout the global economy. Our ultimate goal is a rigorous and relevant global theory of corporate governance. We define corporate governance broadly as the exercise of power over corporate entities so as to increase the value provided to the organization"s various stakeholders, as well as making those stakeholders accountable for acting responsibly with regard to the protection, generation, and distribution of wealth invested in the firm. Because of this broad conceptualization, a wide variety of academic disciplines can contribute to our understanding.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Do Board-Level Employee Representatives Increase Pay Equity in Firms? ESG Ratings and Dividend Changes: Evidence From the Initiation of Nonfinancial Agency Coverage Issue Information Government as a Source of Equity Capital for Entrepreneurs: Evidence From Entrepreneurial Exits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1