评论:商业音乐和电子音乐工作室——影响、借鉴和语言

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Organised Sound Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1017/S1355771822000139
J. Fick, M. Schedel, Brandon Vaccaro
{"title":"评论:商业音乐和电子音乐工作室——影响、借鉴和语言","authors":"J. Fick, M. Schedel, Brandon Vaccaro","doi":"10.1017/S1355771822000139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The genesis of this issue of Organised Sound was a June 2020 article on how an electronica duo created an entire album, designing ‘beats, bass, pads and all’ with the EMS Synthi 100 unit #30 (Trew 2020) that was borrowed from the Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music (IPEM). At the same time, the United States was undergoing a racial reckoning, decades in the making, ignited by the killing of George Floyd in police custody on 25 May 2020 in Minneapolis. This killing and the subsequent protests prompted institutions to examine how they have failed diverse populations. When thinking about how to increase diversity in electroacoustic music, the guest editors concluded that we can take an electroacoustic approach to music that is not traditionally considered academic. We asked questions such as: As we strive for inclusive practices among these disciplines, how have limitations and powers of oppression affected electroacoustic and popular media? What does an approach to the study of electroacoustic music and commercial media production that is informed and invigorated by social justice look like? How can education/training in both areas strive towards diversity? Stated otherwise, are there any stigmas/limiting factors for the hip hop artist to break into electroacoustic music or vice versa? Do we need to reconfigure our definition of electroacoustic in order to recognise people with similar creative instincts, much as George Lewis, who is a leading voice in both jazz and electroacoustic music, has highlighted in the case of black experimental artistry through his history of the Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians (Lewis, 2000, 2008)? The guest editors of this issue found that the unusual case study of the EMS Synthi, and its partnership – at the same time crossing academic and commercial, as well as ‘vernacular’ and ‘art’ music boundaries – has offered an approach that can be adapted to serve the deep mixing of other arenas. Specifically in 2016, sibling duo David and Stephen Dewaele, aka 2manydjs (also known as the prog-rock electronica band Soulwax) embarked on a remarkable collaboration with the IPEM in their hometown of Ghent, Belgium. The commercial music duo, whose music appeared on the soundtrack of Grand Theft Auto V, convinced IPEM to let them house the institute’s legendary EMS Synthi 100 for a year while the ‘research center in systematic musicology’ underwent restoration. Somehow this extremely academic institution1 worked with a band who won the Red Bull Elektropedia Awards for their reinvention of Robyn’s ‘Ever Again’. The result of this collaboration was a ‘highly collectible package’ with a vinyl record and 48-page pamphlet titled ‘EMS Synthi 100 – DEEWEE Sessions Vol.1’. IPEM is credited as a collaborator, and the pamphlet includes an interview with Ivan Schepers, the IPEM technician who has been the synthesiser’s long-term custodian. This was not just a casual borrowing of gear or a rehousing solution, it was a deep mixing of two mutually exclusive worlds: electroacoustic academia and commercial music. Though the collaborators under discussion were all male Europeans (not a population we typically examine when promoting diversity initiatives), their partnership was successful in navigating across demographic and aesthetic boundaries. The structure of their partnership may offer an approach that can be adapted to serve the deep mixing of other arenas that heretofore have excluded a more diverse range of artists. In the 20 years sinceOrganised Sound first dedicated an issue to investigating relationships between music technology and popular music (issue 5/2, 2000), critical interdisciplinary research and practice has uncovered ample cross-pollinations between electroacoustic and commercial media. When we consider and document these influences, we draw on a variety of approaches to analysis that layers the semiotics of music in general with elements particular to electronic music that have emerged and developed in parallel within communities producing electroacoustic music, popular music, audio pedagogy and sound design for film, television and games. This issue explores those points of crossover and in this editorial, we suggest areas where future development is still needed. Naturally, each audio subfield has its own vocabulary and canonical references, and there are","PeriodicalId":45145,"journal":{"name":"Organised Sound","volume":"27 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Commercial music and the electronic music studio – influence, borrowings and language\",\"authors\":\"J. Fick, M. Schedel, Brandon Vaccaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1355771822000139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The genesis of this issue of Organised Sound was a June 2020 article on how an electronica duo created an entire album, designing ‘beats, bass, pads and all’ with the EMS Synthi 100 unit #30 (Trew 2020) that was borrowed from the Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music (IPEM). At the same time, the United States was undergoing a racial reckoning, decades in the making, ignited by the killing of George Floyd in police custody on 25 May 2020 in Minneapolis. This killing and the subsequent protests prompted institutions to examine how they have failed diverse populations. When thinking about how to increase diversity in electroacoustic music, the guest editors concluded that we can take an electroacoustic approach to music that is not traditionally considered academic. We asked questions such as: As we strive for inclusive practices among these disciplines, how have limitations and powers of oppression affected electroacoustic and popular media? What does an approach to the study of electroacoustic music and commercial media production that is informed and invigorated by social justice look like? How can education/training in both areas strive towards diversity? Stated otherwise, are there any stigmas/limiting factors for the hip hop artist to break into electroacoustic music or vice versa? Do we need to reconfigure our definition of electroacoustic in order to recognise people with similar creative instincts, much as George Lewis, who is a leading voice in both jazz and electroacoustic music, has highlighted in the case of black experimental artistry through his history of the Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians (Lewis, 2000, 2008)? The guest editors of this issue found that the unusual case study of the EMS Synthi, and its partnership – at the same time crossing academic and commercial, as well as ‘vernacular’ and ‘art’ music boundaries – has offered an approach that can be adapted to serve the deep mixing of other arenas. Specifically in 2016, sibling duo David and Stephen Dewaele, aka 2manydjs (also known as the prog-rock electronica band Soulwax) embarked on a remarkable collaboration with the IPEM in their hometown of Ghent, Belgium. The commercial music duo, whose music appeared on the soundtrack of Grand Theft Auto V, convinced IPEM to let them house the institute’s legendary EMS Synthi 100 for a year while the ‘research center in systematic musicology’ underwent restoration. Somehow this extremely academic institution1 worked with a band who won the Red Bull Elektropedia Awards for their reinvention of Robyn’s ‘Ever Again’. The result of this collaboration was a ‘highly collectible package’ with a vinyl record and 48-page pamphlet titled ‘EMS Synthi 100 – DEEWEE Sessions Vol.1’. IPEM is credited as a collaborator, and the pamphlet includes an interview with Ivan Schepers, the IPEM technician who has been the synthesiser’s long-term custodian. This was not just a casual borrowing of gear or a rehousing solution, it was a deep mixing of two mutually exclusive worlds: electroacoustic academia and commercial music. Though the collaborators under discussion were all male Europeans (not a population we typically examine when promoting diversity initiatives), their partnership was successful in navigating across demographic and aesthetic boundaries. The structure of their partnership may offer an approach that can be adapted to serve the deep mixing of other arenas that heretofore have excluded a more diverse range of artists. In the 20 years sinceOrganised Sound first dedicated an issue to investigating relationships between music technology and popular music (issue 5/2, 2000), critical interdisciplinary research and practice has uncovered ample cross-pollinations between electroacoustic and commercial media. When we consider and document these influences, we draw on a variety of approaches to analysis that layers the semiotics of music in general with elements particular to electronic music that have emerged and developed in parallel within communities producing electroacoustic music, popular music, audio pedagogy and sound design for film, television and games. This issue explores those points of crossover and in this editorial, we suggest areas where future development is still needed. Naturally, each audio subfield has its own vocabulary and canonical references, and there are\",\"PeriodicalId\":45145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organised Sound\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organised Sound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771822000139\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organised Sound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771822000139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期《有组织的声音》的起源是2020年6月的一篇文章,讲述了电子二人组如何创作一整张专辑,用从心理声学和电子音乐研究所(IPEM)借来的EMS Synthi 100 unit #30 (Trew 2020)设计“节拍、贝斯、拍板和所有东西”。与此同时,美国正在经历一场持续数十年的种族清算,导火索是2020年5月25日乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)在明尼阿波利斯被警察拘留期间被杀。这次杀戮和随后的抗议活动促使各机构审视自己是如何辜负了不同人群的期望。在思考如何增加电声音乐的多样性时,客座编辑得出结论,我们可以采用传统上不被认为是学术性的电声方法来处理音乐。我们提出了这样的问题:当我们努力在这些学科之间进行包容性实践时,压迫的限制和权力是如何影响电声和大众媒体的?电声音乐和商业媒体制作的研究方法是什么样的,这种方法是由社会正义所启发和激励的?这两个领域的教育/培训如何努力实现多样性?如果不是这样,嘻哈歌手进入电声音乐领域是否有什么耻辱/限制因素?反之亦然?我们是否需要重新配置我们对电声的定义,以识别具有类似创作本能的人,就像乔治·刘易斯(George Lewis)一样,他是爵士乐和电声音乐的领军人物,他在创作音乐家促进协会的历史中强调了黑人实验艺术(Lewis, 2000年,2008年)?本期的客座编辑发现,EMS Synthi的不同寻常的案例研究,以及它的合作伙伴关系——同时跨越学术和商业,以及“方言”和“艺术”音乐的界限——提供了一种可以适应于其他领域的深度混合的方法。特别是在2016年,兄弟二人组David和Stephen Dewaele,又名2manydjs(也被称为程序摇滚电子乐队Soulwax)与IPEM在他们的家乡比利时根特展开了一次非凡的合作。这对商业音乐二人组的音乐曾出现在《侠盗猎车手V》的原声带中,他们说服IPEM让他们在“系统音乐学研究中心”进行修复期间,将该研究所的传奇EMS Synthi 100存放一年。不知怎的,这个极端学术的机构与一个乐队合作,这个乐队因重新创作罗宾的《Ever Again》而获得了红牛百科全书奖。这次合作的结果是一个“高度收藏的包裹”与黑胶唱片和48页的小册子题为“EMS Synthi 100 - DEEWEE会议卷1”。IPEM被认为是合作者,这本小册子包括对Ivan Schepers的采访,Ivan Schepers是IPEM的技术人员,他一直是合成器的长期保管人。这不仅仅是一个偶然的借用或重新安置的解决方案,它是两个相互排斥的世界的深度混合:电声学术和商业音乐。尽管讨论中的合作者都是欧洲男性(不是我们在推动多样性倡议时通常考察的人群),但他们的伙伴关系在跨越人口统计学和审美界限方面取得了成功。他们的合作结构可能会提供一种方法,可以适应其他领域的深度混合,迄今为止已经排除了更多样化的艺术家。自从《有组织的声音》第一次专门研究音乐技术和流行音乐之间的关系(2000年第5/2期)以来的20年里,关键的跨学科研究和实践揭示了电声和商业媒体之间大量的交叉授粉。当我们考虑和记录这些影响时,我们利用各种方法进行分析,将音乐的符号学与电子音乐的元素分层,这些元素在制作电声音乐、流行音乐、音频教学法和电影、电视和游戏的声音设计的社区中平行出现和发展。本期探讨了这些交叉点,在这篇社论中,我们提出了未来仍需发展的领域。当然,每个音频子领域都有自己的词汇表和规范参考,确实如此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial: Commercial music and the electronic music studio – influence, borrowings and language
The genesis of this issue of Organised Sound was a June 2020 article on how an electronica duo created an entire album, designing ‘beats, bass, pads and all’ with the EMS Synthi 100 unit #30 (Trew 2020) that was borrowed from the Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music (IPEM). At the same time, the United States was undergoing a racial reckoning, decades in the making, ignited by the killing of George Floyd in police custody on 25 May 2020 in Minneapolis. This killing and the subsequent protests prompted institutions to examine how they have failed diverse populations. When thinking about how to increase diversity in electroacoustic music, the guest editors concluded that we can take an electroacoustic approach to music that is not traditionally considered academic. We asked questions such as: As we strive for inclusive practices among these disciplines, how have limitations and powers of oppression affected electroacoustic and popular media? What does an approach to the study of electroacoustic music and commercial media production that is informed and invigorated by social justice look like? How can education/training in both areas strive towards diversity? Stated otherwise, are there any stigmas/limiting factors for the hip hop artist to break into electroacoustic music or vice versa? Do we need to reconfigure our definition of electroacoustic in order to recognise people with similar creative instincts, much as George Lewis, who is a leading voice in both jazz and electroacoustic music, has highlighted in the case of black experimental artistry through his history of the Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians (Lewis, 2000, 2008)? The guest editors of this issue found that the unusual case study of the EMS Synthi, and its partnership – at the same time crossing academic and commercial, as well as ‘vernacular’ and ‘art’ music boundaries – has offered an approach that can be adapted to serve the deep mixing of other arenas. Specifically in 2016, sibling duo David and Stephen Dewaele, aka 2manydjs (also known as the prog-rock electronica band Soulwax) embarked on a remarkable collaboration with the IPEM in their hometown of Ghent, Belgium. The commercial music duo, whose music appeared on the soundtrack of Grand Theft Auto V, convinced IPEM to let them house the institute’s legendary EMS Synthi 100 for a year while the ‘research center in systematic musicology’ underwent restoration. Somehow this extremely academic institution1 worked with a band who won the Red Bull Elektropedia Awards for their reinvention of Robyn’s ‘Ever Again’. The result of this collaboration was a ‘highly collectible package’ with a vinyl record and 48-page pamphlet titled ‘EMS Synthi 100 – DEEWEE Sessions Vol.1’. IPEM is credited as a collaborator, and the pamphlet includes an interview with Ivan Schepers, the IPEM technician who has been the synthesiser’s long-term custodian. This was not just a casual borrowing of gear or a rehousing solution, it was a deep mixing of two mutually exclusive worlds: electroacoustic academia and commercial music. Though the collaborators under discussion were all male Europeans (not a population we typically examine when promoting diversity initiatives), their partnership was successful in navigating across demographic and aesthetic boundaries. The structure of their partnership may offer an approach that can be adapted to serve the deep mixing of other arenas that heretofore have excluded a more diverse range of artists. In the 20 years sinceOrganised Sound first dedicated an issue to investigating relationships between music technology and popular music (issue 5/2, 2000), critical interdisciplinary research and practice has uncovered ample cross-pollinations between electroacoustic and commercial media. When we consider and document these influences, we draw on a variety of approaches to analysis that layers the semiotics of music in general with elements particular to electronic music that have emerged and developed in parallel within communities producing electroacoustic music, popular music, audio pedagogy and sound design for film, television and games. This issue explores those points of crossover and in this editorial, we suggest areas where future development is still needed. Naturally, each audio subfield has its own vocabulary and canonical references, and there are
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
‘To Explore the World of Sound’: Music, silence and nation-building in Bing Bang Boom (1969) Dissident Sounds: Electronic music in Venezuela from the notions of radical education Radioatelier: Czech radio space for acoustic art 2003–2022 An Art of the Radio: Musique concrète and mass culture, 1941–1952 Weightless Infrastructures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1