了解涡流阵列用于高性能检测

IF 0.5 4区材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING Materials Evaluation Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.32548/2021.me-04226

Anne-Marie Allard, M. Grenier, Mitchell Sirois, C. Wassink

{"title":"了解涡流阵列用于高性能检测","authors":"Anne-Marie Allard, M. Grenier, Mitchell Sirois, C. Wassink","doi":"10.32548/2021.me-04226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eddy current testing (ECT) has been used for quite a while now and has been proven a reliable surface inspection technique for conductive materials. In the last 15 to 20 years, this technique has evolved toward the use of eddy current arrays (ECAs), and many applications can now benefit from this configuration to improve data quality, inspection speed, and ease of deployment, and considerably reduce operator dependency. The physics principle behind ECT and ECA is the same and was addressed in a previous issue of Materials Evaluation (Wassink et al. 2021). In this paper, we will discuss the main differences between ECT and ECA as well as how the arrangement of coils in an array can allow for optimized detection capabilities on different materials or types of defects. Common applications where ECA has demonstrated its strength will also be discussed.","PeriodicalId":49876,"journal":{"name":"Materials Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Eddy Current Array for High-Performance Inspections\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Marie Allard, M. Grenier, Mitchell Sirois, C. Wassink\",\"doi\":\"10.32548/2021.me-04226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Eddy current testing (ECT) has been used for quite a while now and has been proven a reliable surface inspection technique for conductive materials. In the last 15 to 20 years, this technique has evolved toward the use of eddy current arrays (ECAs), and many applications can now benefit from this configuration to improve data quality, inspection speed, and ease of deployment, and considerably reduce operator dependency. The physics principle behind ECT and ECA is the same and was addressed in a previous issue of Materials Evaluation (Wassink et al. 2021). In this paper, we will discuss the main differences between ECT and ECA as well as how the arrangement of coils in an array can allow for optimized detection capabilities on different materials or types of defects. Common applications where ECA has demonstrated its strength will also be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials Evaluation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32548/2021.me-04226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32548/2021.me-04226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

涡流检测（ECT）已经使用了很长一段时间，并且已经被证明是一种可靠的导电材料表面检测技术。在过去的15到20年里，这项技术已经发展到使用涡流阵列（ECA），许多应用现在可以从这种配置中受益，以提高数据质量、检查速度和部署的简易性，并大大减少对操作员的依赖。ECT和ECA背后的物理原理是相同的，并在前一期《材料评估》中进行了阐述（Wassink等人，2021）。在本文中，我们将讨论ECT和ECA之间的主要区别，以及阵列中线圈的排列如何能够优化对不同材料或类型缺陷的检测能力。还将讨论ECA已证明其实力的常见应用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Understanding Eddy Current Array for High-Performance Inspections

Eddy current testing (ECT) has been used for quite a while now and has been proven a reliable surface inspection technique for conductive materials. In the last 15 to 20 years, this technique has evolved toward the use of eddy current arrays (ECAs), and many applications can now benefit from this configuration to improve data quality, inspection speed, and ease of deployment, and considerably reduce operator dependency. The physics principle behind ECT and ECA is the same and was addressed in a previous issue of Materials Evaluation (Wassink et al. 2021). In this paper, we will discuss the main differences between ECT and ECA as well as how the arrangement of coils in an array can allow for optimized detection capabilities on different materials or types of defects. Common applications where ECA has demonstrated its strength will also be discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Materials Evaluation 工程技术-材料科学：表征与测试

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

16.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Materials Evaluation publishes articles, news and features intended to increase the NDT practitioner’s knowledge of the science and technology involved in the field, bringing informative articles to the NDT public while highlighting the ongoing efforts of ASNT to fulfill its mission. M.E. is a peer-reviewed journal, relying on technicians and researchers to help grow and educate its members by providing relevant, cutting-edge and exclusive content containing technical details and discussions. The only periodical of its kind, M.E. is circulated to members and nonmember paid subscribers. The magazine is truly international in scope, with readers in over 90 nations. The journal’s history and archive reaches back to the earliest formative days of the Society.