考察职前教师的批判性信念:批判性识字信念调查(CLBS)的验证

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Education Pub Date : 2022-04-10 DOI:10.1080/10476210.2022.2049742
Vera Sotirovska, Margaret Vaughn
{"title":"考察职前教师的批判性信念:批判性识字信念调查(CLBS)的验证","authors":"Vera Sotirovska, Margaret Vaughn","doi":"10.1080/10476210.2022.2049742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study details the development of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS) with a sample of U.S. pre-service teachers (N = 405) and provides evidence of validity for developing measures of pre-service teachers’ critical literacy beliefs. The CLBS was created to gather data on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about critical literacy and answer the question: What is the internal factor structure of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS), and what evidence of validity do scores from the CLBS provide? The validation of the CLBS and item development resulted in a three-phase process, including cognitive interviews, expert review of items, and survey data collection. Each phase involved a review of the data aligning with each claim. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the CLBS modeled on Lewison et al.’s (2002) four critical literacy dimensions (disrupting the commonplace, interrogating multiple perspectives, focusing on sociopolitical issues, and taking action for social justice). While the qualitative model comprised four factors, the CFA analysis of the CLBS resulted in a three-factor structure with a satisfactory model fit (CFI = .93, TLI = .91, RMSEA = .09, SRMR = .05). We deduced critical literacy tenets that teacher educators can actualize within teacher preparation to cultivate critically-oriented beginning teachers.","PeriodicalId":46594,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"170 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining pre-service teachers’ critical beliefs: Validation of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS)\",\"authors\":\"Vera Sotirovska, Margaret Vaughn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10476210.2022.2049742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study details the development of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS) with a sample of U.S. pre-service teachers (N = 405) and provides evidence of validity for developing measures of pre-service teachers’ critical literacy beliefs. The CLBS was created to gather data on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about critical literacy and answer the question: What is the internal factor structure of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS), and what evidence of validity do scores from the CLBS provide? The validation of the CLBS and item development resulted in a three-phase process, including cognitive interviews, expert review of items, and survey data collection. Each phase involved a review of the data aligning with each claim. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the CLBS modeled on Lewison et al.’s (2002) four critical literacy dimensions (disrupting the commonplace, interrogating multiple perspectives, focusing on sociopolitical issues, and taking action for social justice). While the qualitative model comprised four factors, the CFA analysis of the CLBS resulted in a three-factor structure with a satisfactory model fit (CFI = .93, TLI = .91, RMSEA = .09, SRMR = .05). We deduced critical literacy tenets that teacher educators can actualize within teacher preparation to cultivate critically-oriented beginning teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Education\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2022.2049742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2022.2049742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究以美国职前教师(N = 405)为样本,详细介绍了批判性读写信念调查(CLBS)的发展,并为职前教师批判性读写信念的发展提供了有效性证据。批判性素养信念调查旨在收集职前教师对批判性素养信念的数据,并回答以下问题:批判性素养信念调查的内部因素结构是什么?批判性素养信念调查的分数提供了哪些效度证据?CLBS的验证和项目开发过程分为三个阶段,包括认知访谈、专家审查项目和调查数据收集。每个阶段都涉及对与每项索赔相符的数据进行审查。验证性因子分析(CFA)被用于测试基于Lewison等人(2002)的四个关键识字维度(打破陈腐、质疑多角度、关注社会政治问题和为社会正义采取行动)建模的CLBS。定性模型由四个因素组成,而CLBS的CFA分析结果是三因素结构,模型拟合令人满意(CFI = .93, TLI = .91, RMSEA = .09, SRMR = .05)。我们推断出教师教育者可以在教师准备过程中实施批判性素养原则,以培养具有批判性的初级教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining pre-service teachers’ critical beliefs: Validation of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS)
ABSTRACT This study details the development of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS) with a sample of U.S. pre-service teachers (N = 405) and provides evidence of validity for developing measures of pre-service teachers’ critical literacy beliefs. The CLBS was created to gather data on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about critical literacy and answer the question: What is the internal factor structure of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS), and what evidence of validity do scores from the CLBS provide? The validation of the CLBS and item development resulted in a three-phase process, including cognitive interviews, expert review of items, and survey data collection. Each phase involved a review of the data aligning with each claim. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the CLBS modeled on Lewison et al.’s (2002) four critical literacy dimensions (disrupting the commonplace, interrogating multiple perspectives, focusing on sociopolitical issues, and taking action for social justice). While the qualitative model comprised four factors, the CFA analysis of the CLBS resulted in a three-factor structure with a satisfactory model fit (CFI = .93, TLI = .91, RMSEA = .09, SRMR = .05). We deduced critical literacy tenets that teacher educators can actualize within teacher preparation to cultivate critically-oriented beginning teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Education
Teaching Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Teaching Education is an interdisciplinary forum for innovative practices and research in teacher education. Submission of manuscripts from educational researchers, teacher educators and practicing teachers is encouraged. Contributions are invited which address social and cultural, practical and theoretical aspects of teacher education in university-, college-, and school-based contexts. The journal’s focus is on the challenges and possibilities of rapid social and cultural change for teacher education and, more broadly, for the transformation of education. These challenges include: the impact of new cultures and globalisation on curriculum and pedagogy; new collaborations and partnerships between universities, schools and other social service agencies; the consequences of new community and family configurations for teachers’ work; generational and cultural change in schools and teacher education institutions; new technologies and education; and the impact of higher education policy and funding on teacher education. Manuscripts addressing critical and theory-based research or scholarly reflections and debate on contemporary issues related to teacher education, will be considered. Papers should attempt to present research, innovative theoretical and/or practical insights in relevant current literature and debate.
期刊最新文献
Turkish EFL teachers’ professional learning: reflections on critical incidents Balancing special education knowledge and expertise in teacher training programs The unintended consequences of integrating trauma-informed teaching into teacher education Streaking and self-care planning: the influence of integrating a well-being initiative in one teacher education program From development work to research publication: a case of Norwegian teacher educators developing research literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1