如何提高中国的医疗质量?

Xi Li, H. Krumholz
{"title":"如何提高中国的医疗质量?","authors":"Xi Li, H. Krumholz","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the great strides that have been made during China’s recent healthcare reform to improve access to healthcare,1 substantial gaps in quality persist.2 In a study of 33 tertiary hospitals in China, Jian and colleagues reported no improvement in most process indicators on healthcare quality for acute myocardial infarction, cerebral ischaemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bacterial pneumonia, from 2013 to 2018.3This study provides the most contemporary evidence of quality trends during a 5-year period after the launch of China’s healthcare reform. More importantly, it covers a broad set of treatments for four common clinical conditions that are commonly used for assessing healthcare quality.4–9 \n\nThe poor performance and lack of improvement in Chinese hospitals revealed in this study aligns with prior findings. In a nationally representative study on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from 2001 to 2011, no improvement was found in in-hospital mortality outcomes, which may be a result of the continued underuse of reperfusion therapy and other recommended treatments.10 Through comparisons between urban and rural hospitals, the same study also found that despite differences in treatment and the availability of advanced facilities, outcomes for patients admitted to rural hospitals were similar to those of patients who were admitted to urban hospitals, indicating that the additional resources available at urban hospitals did not result in greater benefits to patients.11 Given the tremendous political commitment and financial investment in China’s healthcare reform during the past decade, it is critical to understand how to improve nationwide healthcare quality.\n\nAn important step toward improvement is to understand the reasons underlying the current quality of care in China. Overall, performance measurements are inadequate.2 The government established a nationwide claims data system—the Hospital …","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"28 1","pages":"955 - 958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009839","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does it take to improve nationwide healthcare quality in China?\",\"authors\":\"Xi Li, H. Krumholz\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the great strides that have been made during China’s recent healthcare reform to improve access to healthcare,1 substantial gaps in quality persist.2 In a study of 33 tertiary hospitals in China, Jian and colleagues reported no improvement in most process indicators on healthcare quality for acute myocardial infarction, cerebral ischaemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bacterial pneumonia, from 2013 to 2018.3This study provides the most contemporary evidence of quality trends during a 5-year period after the launch of China’s healthcare reform. More importantly, it covers a broad set of treatments for four common clinical conditions that are commonly used for assessing healthcare quality.4–9 \\n\\nThe poor performance and lack of improvement in Chinese hospitals revealed in this study aligns with prior findings. In a nationally representative study on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from 2001 to 2011, no improvement was found in in-hospital mortality outcomes, which may be a result of the continued underuse of reperfusion therapy and other recommended treatments.10 Through comparisons between urban and rural hospitals, the same study also found that despite differences in treatment and the availability of advanced facilities, outcomes for patients admitted to rural hospitals were similar to those of patients who were admitted to urban hospitals, indicating that the additional resources available at urban hospitals did not result in greater benefits to patients.11 Given the tremendous political commitment and financial investment in China’s healthcare reform during the past decade, it is critical to understand how to improve nationwide healthcare quality.\\n\\nAn important step toward improvement is to understand the reasons underlying the current quality of care in China. Overall, performance measurements are inadequate.2 The government established a nationwide claims data system—the Hospital …\",\"PeriodicalId\":49653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality & Safety in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"955 - 958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009839\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality & Safety in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

尽管中国最近的医疗改革在改善医疗服务方面取得了巨大进展,但1质量方面的巨大差距仍然存在。2在一项针对中国33家三级医院的研究中,简及其同事报告称,急性心肌梗死、脑缺血卒中、,2013年至2018年,慢性阻塞性肺病和细菌性肺炎。3这项研究提供了中国医疗改革启动后5年内质量趋势的最新证据。更重要的是,它涵盖了四种常见临床疾病的广泛治疗方法,这些疾病通常用于评估医疗质量。4-9本研究揭示的中国医院表现不佳且缺乏改善,这与之前的研究结果一致。2001年至2011年,在一项关于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的全国代表性研究中,未发现住院死亡率的改善,这可能是再灌注治疗和其他推荐治疗持续未得到充分利用的结果。10通过城市和农村医院之间的比较,同一项研究还发现,尽管在治疗和先进设施的可用性方面存在差异,但农村医院的患者与城市医院的患者的结果相似,表明城市医院可用的额外资源并没有给患者带来更大的好处。11鉴于过去十年中国医疗改革的巨大政治承诺和财政投资,了解如何提高全国医疗质量至关重要。改善的一个重要步骤是了解中国目前护理质量的根本原因。总的来说,绩效衡量是不够的。2政府建立了一个全国性的索赔数据系统——医院…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What does it take to improve nationwide healthcare quality in China?
Despite the great strides that have been made during China’s recent healthcare reform to improve access to healthcare,1 substantial gaps in quality persist.2 In a study of 33 tertiary hospitals in China, Jian and colleagues reported no improvement in most process indicators on healthcare quality for acute myocardial infarction, cerebral ischaemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bacterial pneumonia, from 2013 to 2018.3This study provides the most contemporary evidence of quality trends during a 5-year period after the launch of China’s healthcare reform. More importantly, it covers a broad set of treatments for four common clinical conditions that are commonly used for assessing healthcare quality.4–9 The poor performance and lack of improvement in Chinese hospitals revealed in this study aligns with prior findings. In a nationally representative study on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from 2001 to 2011, no improvement was found in in-hospital mortality outcomes, which may be a result of the continued underuse of reperfusion therapy and other recommended treatments.10 Through comparisons between urban and rural hospitals, the same study also found that despite differences in treatment and the availability of advanced facilities, outcomes for patients admitted to rural hospitals were similar to those of patients who were admitted to urban hospitals, indicating that the additional resources available at urban hospitals did not result in greater benefits to patients.11 Given the tremendous political commitment and financial investment in China’s healthcare reform during the past decade, it is critical to understand how to improve nationwide healthcare quality. An important step toward improvement is to understand the reasons underlying the current quality of care in China. Overall, performance measurements are inadequate.2 The government established a nationwide claims data system—the Hospital …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of telephone triage for predicting adverse outcomes in suspected COVID-19: an observational cohort study. Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. Addressing social determinants of health in primary care: a quasi-experimental study using unannounced standardised patients to evaluate the impact of audit/feedback on physicians' rates of identifying and responding to social needs. Reporting on implementation trials with null findings: the need for concurrent process evaluation reporting. Antibiotic documentation: death by a thousand clicks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1