书评:不满:情绪,煽动,和殖民法在英语圈

S. Murphy
{"title":"书评:不满:情绪,煽动,和殖民法在英语圈","authors":"S. Murphy","doi":"10.1177/17438721221125504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"scandalous case of Black death respectable. It is the denial of such respectability politics by Black Lives Matter that makes it politically contentious today. BLM represents a space of disordered appearance that seems to block democratic mourning (at least among white publics), yet in discussing 9/11 Pool also shows how the failure to appear can lead to sovereign mourning. In depicting 9/11 as an attack on the Twin Towers, the buildings “eclipsed the bodies of the victims so completely that human deaths became practically invisible” (104). The bodies that did appear before the public were of “those with access to the media: primarily government and military officials” (112). While it is clear that appearance plays an important role in Pool’s model, more could be done to investigate the ways that deaths are made to appear or disappear, particularly when large-scale tragedies like climate change are at issue. Of course, such an investigation leads to a more pessimistic account of the possibilities for democratic mourning today. Pool ends her book by taking stock of the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. While COVID deaths are widespread, they are not yet public in ways that have motivated democratic debate and responsibility. Pool provides an excellent framework for thinking about the fact that these deaths occur both as a global tragedy and as a personal loss but do not yet seem to have any democratic political impact. Using Pool’s framework, we can think about the hiding away of bodies killed by COVID, the failure to hold employers legally responsible for COVID safety protocols, and the mass denial of the existence of COVID by certain white publics. Pool’s Political Mourning provides a model for analyzing our contemporary politics of mass death and for answering the important question of how we might transform a lack of care into a democratic act of mourning.","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"18 1","pages":"791 - 794"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Disaffected: Emotion, Sedition, and Colonial Law in the Anglosphere\",\"authors\":\"S. Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17438721221125504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"scandalous case of Black death respectable. It is the denial of such respectability politics by Black Lives Matter that makes it politically contentious today. BLM represents a space of disordered appearance that seems to block democratic mourning (at least among white publics), yet in discussing 9/11 Pool also shows how the failure to appear can lead to sovereign mourning. In depicting 9/11 as an attack on the Twin Towers, the buildings “eclipsed the bodies of the victims so completely that human deaths became practically invisible” (104). The bodies that did appear before the public were of “those with access to the media: primarily government and military officials” (112). While it is clear that appearance plays an important role in Pool’s model, more could be done to investigate the ways that deaths are made to appear or disappear, particularly when large-scale tragedies like climate change are at issue. Of course, such an investigation leads to a more pessimistic account of the possibilities for democratic mourning today. Pool ends her book by taking stock of the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. While COVID deaths are widespread, they are not yet public in ways that have motivated democratic debate and responsibility. Pool provides an excellent framework for thinking about the fact that these deaths occur both as a global tragedy and as a personal loss but do not yet seem to have any democratic political impact. Using Pool’s framework, we can think about the hiding away of bodies killed by COVID, the failure to hold employers legally responsible for COVID safety protocols, and the mass denial of the existence of COVID by certain white publics. Pool’s Political Mourning provides a model for analyzing our contemporary politics of mass death and for answering the important question of how we might transform a lack of care into a democratic act of mourning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Culture and the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"791 - 794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Culture and the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721221125504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Culture and the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721221125504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

令人尊敬的黑人死亡丑闻。正是《黑人的命也是命》否认了这种受人尊敬的政治,才使它在今天的政治上引起了争议。土地管理局代表了一个混乱的外表空间,似乎阻碍了民主哀悼(至少在白人公众中),但在讨论9/11时,Pool也表明,不露面会导致主权哀悼。在将9/11描述为对双子塔的袭击时,这些建筑“完全掩盖了受害者的尸体,以至于几乎看不到人类的死亡”(104)。出现在公众面前的机构是“能够接触媒体的机构:主要是政府和军事官员”(112)。虽然很明显,外表在Pool的模型中起着重要作用,但可以做更多的工作来调查死亡的出现或消失方式,特别是在气候变化等大规模悲剧存在争议的情况下。当然,这样的调查导致了对今天民主哀悼的可能性的更悲观的描述。Pool在书的结尾总结了新冠肺炎大流行的早期。尽管新冠肺炎死亡病例普遍存在,但它们尚未以引发民主辩论和责任感的方式公开。Pool提供了一个很好的框架来思考这样一个事实,即这些死亡既是一场全球悲剧,也是一种个人损失,但似乎还没有产生任何民主政治影响。使用Pool的框架,我们可以考虑隐藏因新冠肺炎死亡的尸体,未能让雇主对新冠肺炎安全协议承担法律责任,以及某些白人公众大规模否认新冠肺炎的存在。Pool的《政治哀悼》为分析我们当代的大规模死亡政治提供了一个模型,并回答了一个重要问题,即我们如何将缺乏关爱转变为民主的哀悼行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Disaffected: Emotion, Sedition, and Colonial Law in the Anglosphere
scandalous case of Black death respectable. It is the denial of such respectability politics by Black Lives Matter that makes it politically contentious today. BLM represents a space of disordered appearance that seems to block democratic mourning (at least among white publics), yet in discussing 9/11 Pool also shows how the failure to appear can lead to sovereign mourning. In depicting 9/11 as an attack on the Twin Towers, the buildings “eclipsed the bodies of the victims so completely that human deaths became practically invisible” (104). The bodies that did appear before the public were of “those with access to the media: primarily government and military officials” (112). While it is clear that appearance plays an important role in Pool’s model, more could be done to investigate the ways that deaths are made to appear or disappear, particularly when large-scale tragedies like climate change are at issue. Of course, such an investigation leads to a more pessimistic account of the possibilities for democratic mourning today. Pool ends her book by taking stock of the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. While COVID deaths are widespread, they are not yet public in ways that have motivated democratic debate and responsibility. Pool provides an excellent framework for thinking about the fact that these deaths occur both as a global tragedy and as a personal loss but do not yet seem to have any democratic political impact. Using Pool’s framework, we can think about the hiding away of bodies killed by COVID, the failure to hold employers legally responsible for COVID safety protocols, and the mass denial of the existence of COVID by certain white publics. Pool’s Political Mourning provides a model for analyzing our contemporary politics of mass death and for answering the important question of how we might transform a lack of care into a democratic act of mourning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Our mission is to publish high quality work at the intersection of scholarship on law, culture, and the humanities. All commentaries, articles and review essays are peer reviewed. We provide a publishing vehicle for scholars engaged in interdisciplinary, humanistically oriented legal scholarship. We publish a wide range of scholarship in legal history, legal theory and jurisprudence, law and cultural studies, law and literature, and legal hermeneutics.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: The Living from the Dead: Disaffirming Biopolitics Book Review: King Leopold’s Ghostwriter: The Creation of Persons and States in the Nineteenth Century Book Review: The Pen, The Sword, and the Law: Dueling and Democracy in Uruguay Book Review: Earthbound: The Aesthetics of Sovereignty in the Anthropocene Diagnosing Dignity’s De-Realization: Lessons From The ‘Laws Of Captivity’ Thesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1