价值链和贸易虚开发票带来的非法资金流动:印尼-新加坡

M. Rusydi, G. Irianto, M. Achsin
{"title":"价值链和贸易虚开发票带来的非法资金流动:印尼-新加坡","authors":"M. Rusydi, G. Irianto, M. Achsin","doi":"10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to analyze the potential for illicit financial flows with the practice of misinvoicing the impact of differences in recording the value of exports and imports of Indonesia and Singapore, as well as calculating the potential loss of state revenue from the tax sector of the trade balance disparity in Indonesia and Singapore. This research is a type of quantitative research. The data source is secondary data collected from the Indonesia-Singapore trade balance in 2016-2020 with a sample of 20 leading Indonesian export commodities to Singapore. Data analysis focuses on estimating the size of illicit financial flows and the potential loss of state revenue. The trade misinvoicing scenario is under-invoicing exports and over-invoicing exports. Meanwhile, the focus is on under-invoicing exports for calculating the potential lost state revenue. This study has found that from the 20 commodities traded between Indonesia and Singapore, there was a difference between over-invoicing and under-invoicing of US$.830 million, which means that illicit financial flows from Indonesia to Singapore have reached US$830 million from trade misinvoicing practices from Indonesia—2016 to 2020. Meanwhile, the potential loss of state revenue from the tax sector due to under-invoicing exports in the 5 (year) 2016-2020 period is around US$563 million. This potential loss results from Income Shifting by exporting companies to Singapore.","PeriodicalId":32350,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VALUE CHAINS AND ILLICIT FINANCIAL FLOWS FROM TRADE MISINVOICING: INDONESIA-SINGAPORE\",\"authors\":\"M. Rusydi, G. Irianto, M. Achsin\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to analyze the potential for illicit financial flows with the practice of misinvoicing the impact of differences in recording the value of exports and imports of Indonesia and Singapore, as well as calculating the potential loss of state revenue from the tax sector of the trade balance disparity in Indonesia and Singapore. This research is a type of quantitative research. The data source is secondary data collected from the Indonesia-Singapore trade balance in 2016-2020 with a sample of 20 leading Indonesian export commodities to Singapore. Data analysis focuses on estimating the size of illicit financial flows and the potential loss of state revenue. The trade misinvoicing scenario is under-invoicing exports and over-invoicing exports. Meanwhile, the focus is on under-invoicing exports for calculating the potential lost state revenue. This study has found that from the 20 commodities traded between Indonesia and Singapore, there was a difference between over-invoicing and under-invoicing of US$.830 million, which means that illicit financial flows from Indonesia to Singapore have reached US$830 million from trade misinvoicing practices from Indonesia—2016 to 2020. Meanwhile, the potential loss of state revenue from the tax sector due to under-invoicing exports in the 5 (year) 2016-2020 period is around US$563 million. This potential loss results from Income Shifting by exporting companies to Singapore.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析印度尼西亚和新加坡在记录进出口价值方面的差异所产生的错误发票影响的非法资金流动的可能性,以及计算印度尼西亚和新加坡贸易平衡差异的税收部门的国家收入的潜在损失。本研究是一种定量研究。数据来源是从2016-2020年印尼-新加坡贸易平衡中收集的二手数据,样本为印尼对新加坡出口的20种主要商品。数据分析的重点是估计非法资金流动的规模和国家收入的潜在损失。贸易错开发票的情况是少开出口发票和多开出口发票。与此同时,重点是低估出口,以计算潜在的国家收入损失。本研究发现,从印尼和新加坡之间交易的20种商品中,存在美元的高发票和低发票之间的差异。8.30亿美元,这意味着2016年至2020年,由于印尼的贸易虚假发票行为,从印尼流入新加坡的非法资金已达到8.3亿美元。与此同时,2016-2020年期间,由于低开出口发票,税收部门的潜在收入损失约为5.63亿美元。这种潜在损失是由于出口公司向新加坡转移收入造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VALUE CHAINS AND ILLICIT FINANCIAL FLOWS FROM TRADE MISINVOICING: INDONESIA-SINGAPORE
This study aimed to analyze the potential for illicit financial flows with the practice of misinvoicing the impact of differences in recording the value of exports and imports of Indonesia and Singapore, as well as calculating the potential loss of state revenue from the tax sector of the trade balance disparity in Indonesia and Singapore. This research is a type of quantitative research. The data source is secondary data collected from the Indonesia-Singapore trade balance in 2016-2020 with a sample of 20 leading Indonesian export commodities to Singapore. Data analysis focuses on estimating the size of illicit financial flows and the potential loss of state revenue. The trade misinvoicing scenario is under-invoicing exports and over-invoicing exports. Meanwhile, the focus is on under-invoicing exports for calculating the potential lost state revenue. This study has found that from the 20 commodities traded between Indonesia and Singapore, there was a difference between over-invoicing and under-invoicing of US$.830 million, which means that illicit financial flows from Indonesia to Singapore have reached US$830 million from trade misinvoicing practices from Indonesia—2016 to 2020. Meanwhile, the potential loss of state revenue from the tax sector due to under-invoicing exports in the 5 (year) 2016-2020 period is around US$563 million. This potential loss results from Income Shifting by exporting companies to Singapore.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE IMPACT OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION, CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE, E-SERVICE QUALITY TO CUSTOMER TRUST IN PURCHASING DIGITAL PRODUCT AT THE MARKETPLACE EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED BRAND GLOBALNESS AND LOCALNESS: A CASE STUDY ON HIGH-INVOLVEMENT GOODS THE DIGITAL MARKETING TO INFLUENCE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION MEDIATED BY PURCHASE DECISION SYSTEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTENTION MODEL, FAMILY BACKGROUND, AND PRIOR ENTREPRENEURIAL EXPERIENCE ON STUDENTS’ ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION THE VALUE OF CATUR PURUSA ARTHA AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP ORIENTATION AS A BASE FOR MAXIMIZING SMEs PERFORMANCE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1