pN2非小细胞肺癌癌症患者术后高淋巴结阳性与采样率的潜在放射治疗指标

N. Mankuzhy, M. Almahariq, C. Stevens, T. Quinn
{"title":"pN2非小细胞肺癌癌症患者术后高淋巴结阳性与采样率的潜在放射治疗指标","authors":"N. Mankuzhy, M. Almahariq, C. Stevens, T. Quinn","doi":"10.33696/CANCERIMMUNOL.2.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite advances in cancer treatment and screening, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States [1]. The majority of cases are locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment of which usually includes a bior tri-modality therapy utilizing a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. For patients initially treated with surgery, use of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for completely resected NSCLC has remained controversial since the initial publication of the PORT meta-analysis in 1998 [2]. Stewart et al. reported an overall detriment of PORT on overall survival (OS), which was proposed to be linked to factors outside of inferior cancer control, such as adverse treatment effects. However, no clear impairment to OS existed in patients found to have mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), leading to multiple single-institution and database registry analyses investigating this question. These studies are limited by indication bias inherent to retrospective design, but provided justification of continued use of PORT in pN2 disease. Despite absence of high-level evidence, PORT has remained standard of care for this subset of NSCLC due to benefits in locoregional control and OS as indicated by American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) practice guidelines [3]. Abstract","PeriodicalId":73633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Lymph Node Positive to Sampled Ratio as a Potential Indication for Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Patients with pN2 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"N. Mankuzhy, M. Almahariq, C. Stevens, T. Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.33696/CANCERIMMUNOL.2.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite advances in cancer treatment and screening, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States [1]. The majority of cases are locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment of which usually includes a bior tri-modality therapy utilizing a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. For patients initially treated with surgery, use of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for completely resected NSCLC has remained controversial since the initial publication of the PORT meta-analysis in 1998 [2]. Stewart et al. reported an overall detriment of PORT on overall survival (OS), which was proposed to be linked to factors outside of inferior cancer control, such as adverse treatment effects. However, no clear impairment to OS existed in patients found to have mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), leading to multiple single-institution and database registry analyses investigating this question. These studies are limited by indication bias inherent to retrospective design, but provided justification of continued use of PORT in pN2 disease. Despite absence of high-level evidence, PORT has remained standard of care for this subset of NSCLC due to benefits in locoregional control and OS as indicated by American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) practice guidelines [3]. Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":73633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33696/CANCERIMMUNOL.2.032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/CANCERIMMUNOL.2.032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管在癌症治疗和筛查方面取得了进展,但肺癌仍然是美国癌症死亡的主要原因。大多数病例为局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),其治疗通常包括手术、化疗和放射治疗相结合的生物或三模式治疗。对于最初接受手术治疗的患者,自1998年首次发表PORT荟萃分析以来,使用术后放射治疗(PORT)治疗完全切除的非小细胞肺癌一直存在争议。Stewart等人报道了PORT对总生存期(OS)的总体损害,这被认为与癌症控制不佳之外的因素有关,例如不良的治疗效果。然而,发现纵隔淋巴结受累(pN2)的患者没有明显的OS损害,导致多个单机构和数据库注册分析调查了这个问题。这些研究受到回顾性设计固有的适应症偏倚的限制,但为pN2疾病继续使用PORT提供了理由。尽管缺乏高水平的证据,PORT仍然是这类非小细胞肺癌的标准治疗,因为它在局部区域控制和OS方面的益处,正如美国放射肿瘤学学会(ASTRO)实践指南[3]所指出的那样。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High Lymph Node Positive to Sampled Ratio as a Potential Indication for Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Patients with pN2 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
Despite advances in cancer treatment and screening, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States [1]. The majority of cases are locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment of which usually includes a bior tri-modality therapy utilizing a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. For patients initially treated with surgery, use of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for completely resected NSCLC has remained controversial since the initial publication of the PORT meta-analysis in 1998 [2]. Stewart et al. reported an overall detriment of PORT on overall survival (OS), which was proposed to be linked to factors outside of inferior cancer control, such as adverse treatment effects. However, no clear impairment to OS existed in patients found to have mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), leading to multiple single-institution and database registry analyses investigating this question. These studies are limited by indication bias inherent to retrospective design, but provided justification of continued use of PORT in pN2 disease. Despite absence of high-level evidence, PORT has remained standard of care for this subset of NSCLC due to benefits in locoregional control and OS as indicated by American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) practice guidelines [3]. Abstract
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Tumor and Host Microbiome on Immunotherapy Response in Urologic Cancers Role of a Training Simulator for Kidney Biopsy and Tumor Removal Procedures in Complex Positioning Scenarios: The Key Challenges Perioperative Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Muscle-Invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Enhancing the Efficacy of CAR-T Cell Therapy: A Comprehensive Exploration of Cellular Strategies and Molecular Dynamics. Combining EGFR and KRAS G12C Inhibitors for KRAS G12C Mutated Advanced Colorectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1