KRAS is a commonly mutated gene in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, inhibitors of KRAS G12C were developed and have shown promising efficacy for KRAS G12C mutated non-small cell lung cancer. However, KRAS G12C inhibitor monotherapy has not demonstrated excellent efficacy for KRAS G12C mutated advanced CRC due to multiple resistance mechanisms, especially receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling activation. To overcome this resistance mechanism, various combinations of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS G12C inhibitors, including panitumumab plus sotorasib, have been investigated in clinical trials. The combination of EGFR and KRAS G12C inhibitors for KRAS G12C mutated CRC demonstrated overall response rates ranging from 26% to 62.5% in seven clinical trials of phase I to III, whose data are available so far. The median progression-free survival in these trials ranged from 3.9 to 8.1 months. These efficacy data suggest that KRAS G12C inhibitor combination with EGFR inhibitors is more effective for KRAS G12C mutated advanced CRC than KRAS G12C inhibitor monotherapy. They also showed reasonable safety of the combination regimen. Based on these results, phase III clinical trials are being conducted to investigate EGFR and KRAS G12C inhibitor combinations as a first or second-line treatment for KRAS G12C mutated advanced CRC. Furthermore, other KRAS G12C inhibitors, KRAS G12D inhibitors, and pan-RAS inhibitors are being developed, which could make more patients with advanced CRC eligible for KRAS inhibition.
Checkpoint inhibitors offer promise in treating muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer, but the optimal timing of their administration-neoadjuvant or adjuvant-remains unclear. To determine the efficacy of combining checkpoint inhibition with standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy, we conducted a phase II trial of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 (αPD-1) and anti-CTLA-4 (αCTLA-4), in combination with cisplatin-gemcitabine, for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy. In addition, a novel murine model of spontaneous metastatic bladder cancer was used to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant anti-PD-L1 (αPD-L1) treatment. The clinical trial was closed prematurely due to the industry's withdrawal of drug provision. Adverse events were observed in all patients; however, serious adverse events were not observed in any patient. A complete pathologic response was observed in 50% of the 4 patients enrolled. Response to treatment was significantly associated with elevated urinary T cells including CD8+ and IFNγ+ CD4+ T cells, suggesting potential reinforcement of immune responses by neoadjuvant αPD-1 and αCTLA-4 against bladder tumor cells. These findings suggest that combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting could be safe. However, the complete response rate of this four-drug regimen was modest and emphasizes the need for randomized controlled trials to properly assess immunotherapy efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting. In corresponding murine studies, the MB49-met model consistently displayed widespread metastasis, including tumor growth in the lungs, liver, and bowel mesentery, within 20 days of subcutaneous transplantation. Mice receiving surgery plus neoadjuvant αPD-L1 or adjuvant αPD-L1 exhibited improved survival compared to those receiving only αPD-L1. However, no significant difference in survival was observed between the neoadjuvant and adjuvant αPD-L1 cohorts. Furthermore, the timing of neoadjuvant therapy administration (early vs. late) did not significantly impact survival. This study highlights the potential of perioperative immunotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer.
Protein post-translational modifications play a vital role in various cellular events essential for maintaining cellular physiology and homeostasis. In cancer cells, aberrant post-translational modifications such as glycosylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation on proteins can result in the generation of antigenic peptide variants presented in complex with MHC molecules. These modified peptides add to the class of tumorspecific antigens and offer promising avenues for targeted anti- cancer therapies. In this review, we focus on the role of phosphorylated peptides (p-peptides) in cancer immunity. We discuss the mechanisms by which the phosphorylated moiety modifies the structural features and binding properties of p-peptides with MHC, compared to their non-phosphorylated counterparts. Additionally, we review recent work on how the HLA-B*07-specific p-peptide, pMLL747-755, interacts with its cognate TCR. Altogether, p-peptides are emerging as a novel class of tumor-specific antigens, expanding the range of targets in cancer immunotherapy.
The emergence of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, particularly for hematologic malignancies. This commentary discusses developments in CAR-T cell therapy, focusing on the molecular mechanisms governing T cell fate and differentiation. Transcriptional and epigenetic factors play a pivotal role in determining the specificity, effectiveness, and durability of CAR-T cell therapy. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial to improve the efficacy and decrease the adverse events associated with CAR-T cell therapies, unlocking the full potential of these approaches. T cell differentiation in CAR-T cell product manufacturing plays an important role in clinical outcomes. A positive correlation exists between the clinical efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy and signatures of memory, whereas a negative correlation has been observed with signatures of effector function or exhaustion. The effectiveness of CAR-T cell products is likely influenced by T-cell frequency and by their ability to proliferate, which is closely linked to early T cell differentiation. The differentiation process involving distinct T memory cell subsets is initiated upon antigen elimination, indicating infection resolution. In chronic infections or cancer, T cells may undergo exhaustion, marked by continuous inhibitory receptor expression, decreased cytokine production, and diminished proliferative capacity. Other cell subsets, such as CD4+ T cells, innate-like T lymphocytes, NKT cells, and cord blood-derived hematopoietic stem cells, offer unique advantages in developing the next-generation CAR-T cell-based therapies. Future research should focus on optimizing T-cell-enhancing approaches and developing strategies to potentially cure patients with hematological diseases and solid tumors.