中美洲生物圈保护区森林覆盖的保护与当地非农业占用的增加有关

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pecon.2022.03.006
Daniel Martín Auliz-Ortiz , Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez , Eduardo Mendoza , Miguel Martínez-Ramos
{"title":"中美洲生物圈保护区森林覆盖的保护与当地非农业占用的增加有关","authors":"Daniel Martín Auliz-Ortiz ,&nbsp;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Eduardo Mendoza ,&nbsp;Miguel Martínez-Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2022.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Protected areas can prevent forest loss, but their effects on forest fragmentation and forest regrowth are poorly understood. Furthermore, the importance of protected areas in shaping these forest spatial changes may depend on different socioeconomic drivers (e.g. population size, distance to cities, proportion of local people working in non-farm occupation), but the empirical evidence on such dependence is very scarce. Here, we used contra factual technics to assess whether biosphere reserves (n = 19) in the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot can reduce forest loss and fragmentation and promote forest regrowth during the period 2000–2020. We used satellite imagery and governmental data to assess the socioeconomic factors driving these changes. Particularly, using multimodel inference analysis, we tested whether higher non-farm occupation, combined with low demographic pressures, reduces forest loss and fragmentation and promotes forest regrowth. We found that reserves reduce forest loss and preserve less-fragmented configurations, however, they neither reduce fragmentation rate nor promote forest regrowth. Forest loss rate inside the reserves decreased as non-farm occupation enhanced and the density of rural settlements decreased. Therefore, promoting higher opportunities in non-farm economic activities and planning rural settlements distribution around reserves could help to increase the effectiveness of reserves for forest conservation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages 286-293"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000268/pdfft?md5=27b3a709896fb38b662bd58925c38143&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064422000268-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation of forest cover in Mesoamerican biosphere reserves is associated with the increase of local non-farm occupation\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Martín Auliz-Ortiz ,&nbsp;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Eduardo Mendoza ,&nbsp;Miguel Martínez-Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2022.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Protected areas can prevent forest loss, but their effects on forest fragmentation and forest regrowth are poorly understood. Furthermore, the importance of protected areas in shaping these forest spatial changes may depend on different socioeconomic drivers (e.g. population size, distance to cities, proportion of local people working in non-farm occupation), but the empirical evidence on such dependence is very scarce. Here, we used contra factual technics to assess whether biosphere reserves (n = 19) in the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot can reduce forest loss and fragmentation and promote forest regrowth during the period 2000–2020. We used satellite imagery and governmental data to assess the socioeconomic factors driving these changes. Particularly, using multimodel inference analysis, we tested whether higher non-farm occupation, combined with low demographic pressures, reduces forest loss and fragmentation and promotes forest regrowth. We found that reserves reduce forest loss and preserve less-fragmented configurations, however, they neither reduce fragmentation rate nor promote forest regrowth. Forest loss rate inside the reserves decreased as non-farm occupation enhanced and the density of rural settlements decreased. Therefore, promoting higher opportunities in non-farm economic activities and planning rural settlements distribution around reserves could help to increase the effectiveness of reserves for forest conservation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 286-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000268/pdfft?md5=27b3a709896fb38b662bd58925c38143&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064422000268-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000268\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

保护区可以防止森林损失,但它们对森林破碎化和森林再生的影响了解甚少。此外,保护区在塑造这些森林空间变化方面的重要性可能取决于不同的社会经济驱动因素(如人口规模、与城市的距离、从事非农业职业的当地人口比例),但关于这种依赖的经验证据非常缺乏。本文采用反事实技术对2000-2020年中美洲生物多样性热点地区的生物圈保护区(n = 19)是否能减少森林损失和破碎化,促进森林再生进行了评价。我们使用卫星图像和政府数据来评估推动这些变化的社会经济因素。特别是,使用多模型推理分析,我们测试了较高的非农业职业,结合低人口压力,是否减少了森林损失和破碎化,并促进了森林的再生。研究发现,保护区减少了森林的损失,保留了较少破碎化的结构,但既没有降低破碎化率,也没有促进森林的再生。保护区内森林损失率随非农业占用的增加和农村居民点密度的降低而降低。因此,提高非农业经济活动的机会,规划保护区周围农村住区的分布,有助于提高保护区保护森林的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conservation of forest cover in Mesoamerican biosphere reserves is associated with the increase of local non-farm occupation

Protected areas can prevent forest loss, but their effects on forest fragmentation and forest regrowth are poorly understood. Furthermore, the importance of protected areas in shaping these forest spatial changes may depend on different socioeconomic drivers (e.g. population size, distance to cities, proportion of local people working in non-farm occupation), but the empirical evidence on such dependence is very scarce. Here, we used contra factual technics to assess whether biosphere reserves (n = 19) in the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot can reduce forest loss and fragmentation and promote forest regrowth during the period 2000–2020. We used satellite imagery and governmental data to assess the socioeconomic factors driving these changes. Particularly, using multimodel inference analysis, we tested whether higher non-farm occupation, combined with low demographic pressures, reduces forest loss and fragmentation and promotes forest regrowth. We found that reserves reduce forest loss and preserve less-fragmented configurations, however, they neither reduce fragmentation rate nor promote forest regrowth. Forest loss rate inside the reserves decreased as non-farm occupation enhanced and the density of rural settlements decreased. Therefore, promoting higher opportunities in non-farm economic activities and planning rural settlements distribution around reserves could help to increase the effectiveness of reserves for forest conservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
期刊最新文献
Declining representation of imperiled Atlantic Forest birds in community-science datasets Climate influence on future suitability of high-altitude wetlands in two natural protected areas from the Central Andes of Argentina Is banning Persistent Organic Pollutants efficient? A quantitative and qualitative systematic review in bats Identifying priority conservation areas for the Andean Condor in Colombia Past references are insufficient for Latin American biodiversity conservation in the Anthropocene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1