SMOS和SMAP时间间隔内表层土壤湿度及其他气象变量的稳定性研究

IF 4 3区 地球科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1109/lgrs.2020.3009411
Na Yang, Yanjie Tang, Yongqiang Chen, Feng Xiang
{"title":"SMOS和SMAP时间间隔内表层土壤湿度及其他气象变量的稳定性研究","authors":"Na Yang, Yanjie Tang, Yongqiang Chen, Feng Xiang","doi":"10.1109/lgrs.2020.3009411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The different orbit design and launching conditions of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS, ESA) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP, NASA) result in different passing time over any point on the ground. The time lag between the two satellites is thought to be one of the reasons to induce uncertainties in soil moisture data comparison and validation. This letter calculates the temporal difference between SMOS and SMAP at first; it is found that their mismatch mainly concentrates within a period of 30–90 min. During such time lag, the change in surface soil moisture (5 cm) and other meteorological variables is analyzed on the basis of the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) high-frequency (5-min) field observations and Murrumbidgee Soil Moisture Monitoring Network (MSMMN) in situ measurements (20-min). This letter found that in most cases, air temperature, wind, and relative humidity present a moderate change of about 10%–20%, while solar radiation shows very strong variation from tens to hundreds (%). Soil moisture and soil temperature are always stable, the value of soil moisture at the two time points when SMOS and SMAP pass overhead are almost the same, and the averaged minimum and maximum fluctuations of soil moisture are only 0.004/0.003 and 0.007/0.01 $\\text{m}^{3}/\\text{m}^{3}$ , respectively, which are far less than the nominal accuracy of satellites (0.04 $\\text{m}^{3}/\\text{m}^{3})$ and probably unrecognizable. Soil moisture experiences a natural fading of very small magnitude during the time intervals of satellites, the temporal mismatch may not induce external uncertainties in soil moisture data comparison and validation, and it is safe to conclude that the impact is negligible.","PeriodicalId":13046,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters","volume":"18 1","pages":"1911-1915"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/lgrs.2020.3009411","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on Stability of Surface Soil Moisture and Other Meteorological Variables Within Time Intervals of SMOS and SMAP\",\"authors\":\"Na Yang, Yanjie Tang, Yongqiang Chen, Feng Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/lgrs.2020.3009411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The different orbit design and launching conditions of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS, ESA) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP, NASA) result in different passing time over any point on the ground. The time lag between the two satellites is thought to be one of the reasons to induce uncertainties in soil moisture data comparison and validation. This letter calculates the temporal difference between SMOS and SMAP at first; it is found that their mismatch mainly concentrates within a period of 30–90 min. During such time lag, the change in surface soil moisture (5 cm) and other meteorological variables is analyzed on the basis of the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) high-frequency (5-min) field observations and Murrumbidgee Soil Moisture Monitoring Network (MSMMN) in situ measurements (20-min). This letter found that in most cases, air temperature, wind, and relative humidity present a moderate change of about 10%–20%, while solar radiation shows very strong variation from tens to hundreds (%). Soil moisture and soil temperature are always stable, the value of soil moisture at the two time points when SMOS and SMAP pass overhead are almost the same, and the averaged minimum and maximum fluctuations of soil moisture are only 0.004/0.003 and 0.007/0.01 $\\\\text{m}^{3}/\\\\text{m}^{3}$ , respectively, which are far less than the nominal accuracy of satellites (0.04 $\\\\text{m}^{3}/\\\\text{m}^{3})$ and probably unrecognizable. Soil moisture experiences a natural fading of very small magnitude during the time intervals of satellites, the temporal mismatch may not induce external uncertainties in soil moisture data comparison and validation, and it is safe to conclude that the impact is negligible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"1911-1915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/lgrs.2020.3009411\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/lgrs.2020.3009411\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/lgrs.2020.3009411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

土壤湿度和海洋盐度(SMOS, ESA)和土壤湿度主动式被动(SMAP, NASA)的不同轨道设计和发射条件导致在地面任何点上的通过时间不同。两颗卫星之间的时间差被认为是导致土壤湿度数据比较和验证不确定的原因之一。本文首先计算了SMOS和SMAP的时间差;在这段时间内,基于美国气候参考网(USCRN)高频(5 min)野外观测和Murrumbidgee土壤湿度监测网(MSMMN)现场测量(20 min),对表层土壤湿度(5 cm)等气象变量的变化进行了分析。这封信发现,在大多数情况下,空气温度、风和相对湿度呈现出大约10%-20%的温和变化,而太阳辐射表现出非常强烈的变化,从几十到几百(%)。土壤湿度和土壤温度始终保持稳定,SMOS和SMAP经过上空的两个时间点的土壤湿度值几乎相同,土壤湿度的平均最小和最大波动值分别仅为0.004/0.003和0.007/0.01 $\text{m}^{3}/\text{m}^{3}$,远远低于卫星的标称精度(0.04 $\text{m}^{3}/\text{m}^{3})$,可能无法识别。在卫星时间间隔内,土壤湿度经历了非常小幅度的自然衰减,时间失配可能不会引起土壤湿度数据比较和验证中的外部不确定性,可以安全地得出影响可以忽略不计的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on Stability of Surface Soil Moisture and Other Meteorological Variables Within Time Intervals of SMOS and SMAP
The different orbit design and launching conditions of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS, ESA) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP, NASA) result in different passing time over any point on the ground. The time lag between the two satellites is thought to be one of the reasons to induce uncertainties in soil moisture data comparison and validation. This letter calculates the temporal difference between SMOS and SMAP at first; it is found that their mismatch mainly concentrates within a period of 30–90 min. During such time lag, the change in surface soil moisture (5 cm) and other meteorological variables is analyzed on the basis of the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) high-frequency (5-min) field observations and Murrumbidgee Soil Moisture Monitoring Network (MSMMN) in situ measurements (20-min). This letter found that in most cases, air temperature, wind, and relative humidity present a moderate change of about 10%–20%, while solar radiation shows very strong variation from tens to hundreds (%). Soil moisture and soil temperature are always stable, the value of soil moisture at the two time points when SMOS and SMAP pass overhead are almost the same, and the averaged minimum and maximum fluctuations of soil moisture are only 0.004/0.003 and 0.007/0.01 $\text{m}^{3}/\text{m}^{3}$ , respectively, which are far less than the nominal accuracy of satellites (0.04 $\text{m}^{3}/\text{m}^{3})$ and probably unrecognizable. Soil moisture experiences a natural fading of very small magnitude during the time intervals of satellites, the temporal mismatch may not induce external uncertainties in soil moisture data comparison and validation, and it is safe to conclude that the impact is negligible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters (GRSL) is a monthly publication for short papers (maximum length 5 pages) addressing new ideas and formative concepts in remote sensing as well as important new and timely results and concepts. Papers should relate to the theory, concepts and techniques of science and engineering as applied to sensing the earth, oceans, atmosphere, and space, and the processing, interpretation, and dissemination of this information. The technical content of papers must be both new and significant. Experimental data must be complete and include sufficient description of experimental apparatus, methods, and relevant experimental conditions. GRSL encourages the incorporation of "extended objects" or "multimedia" such as animations to enhance the shorter papers.
期刊最新文献
A “Difference In Difference” based method for unsupervised change detection in season-varying images AccuLiteFastNet: A Remote Sensing Object Detection Model Combining High Accuracy, Lightweight Design, and Fast Inference Speed Monitoring ten insect pests in selected orchards in three Azorean Islands: The project CUARENTAGRI. Maritime Radar Target Detection in Sea Clutter Based on CNN With Dual-Perspective Attention A Semantics-Geometry Framework for Road Extraction From Remote Sensing Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1